radar detector direct wire
reception, may I suggest mounting the detector to the right
of the mirror. With regular tinted glass, this places it a bit below
the bottom of the tint band.
The benefit of this is that you can draw power from the circuit
for the courtesy light in the mirror. Plus the detector is higher
so range forward (and rearward if it is a V1) is likely better. Also,
it is out of your line of sight in the shadow of the mirror.
.
reception, may I suggest mounting the detector to the right
of the mirror. With regular tinted glass, this places it a bit below
the bottom of the tint band.
The benefit of this is that you can draw power from the circuit
for the courtesy light in the mirror. Plus the detector is higher
so range forward (and rearward if it is a V1) is likely better. Also,
it is out of your line of sight in the shadow of the mirror.
.
http://www.radarbusters.com/support/...detector/2.asp
http://www.radarbusters.com/support/...detector/2.asp
Here's a pic
http://www.wku.edu/~nathan.plemons/g...tte/gauges.jpg
If I had a better detector in the first place I might have worried about putting it in a more optimal spot.
reception, may I suggest mounting the detector to the right
of the mirror. With regular tinted glass, this places it a bit below
the bottom of the tint band.
The benefit of this is that you can draw power from the circuit
for the courtesy light in the mirror. Plus the detector is higher
so range forward (and rearward if it is a V1) is likely better. Also,
it is out of your line of sight in the shadow of the mirror.
.
I have the windshield with the cut out at bottom on ZR-1 for radar detectors, so I am have to mount it there.
Last edited by dbriana; Jan 9, 2006 at 10:32 AM.

on the flip side, one could argue that mounting it "high" would elevate the detector and give it a better "view" of the road up and above (or close to it) the vehicle in front of the detector (if any) and able to detect what is "stray" or reflecting.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
it's ability to pick up "splatter" from speed detecting devices.
500'. (They state that radar is 85ft in dia at twice the distance.) I
had not considered this.
Since the practice is probably to aim at the body mass, even allowing
for whatever the increase in dia is at the distances (> 500') that LEOs
might target vehicles in the real world, it would seem that lower would
be better to improve chances of catching scatter from the fringes of a
small beam.
In 'over the hill' radar situations, does mounting lower reduce performance?
Does it matter? As for rearward field of view where machines have this
capability, the lower the placement, the greater the obstruction from
occupants and other objects in the interior.
As for the question of power. I have seen posts that mention routing
cords via the defroster outlet but I have no links. I'd suggest
expanding your search to include the Off Topic forum because RD
threads seem to start or get moved there.
.





















