Drag suspension
Aaron
Aaron
No question, for a 10sec and faster car.But a Dana 44 and an automatic can last to high 10's.
Other than adjustable shocks and 3:54 gears I am running a stock suspension,
No question, for a 10sec and faster car.But a Dana 44 and an automatic can last to high 10's.
Other than adjustable shocks and 3:54 gears I am running a stock suspension,
No question, for a 10sec and faster car.But a Dana 44 and an automatic can last to high 10's.
Other than adjustable shocks and 3:54 gears I am running a stock suspension,
Anyway, drag racing an IAS car takes some work. Those of us that do it have paved the road for many to follow. Suspension alignment is critical with these cars... Sticks like 2-2.5 degrees of POSITIVE camber, autos tend to do best in the .5-1.5 range... You don't EVER want negative camber: when the car hits the tires it pushes them out in an arc. With negative camber you lose a HUGE amount of contact (you'll be trying to hook on the insides of the tires); with positive camber they will flat track and give you a complete contact patch. Remove or disconnect the front swaybar, add adj. heim joints to the rear swaybar so you can preload the right rear. GOOD shocks are a must if you're serious... At the very least a set of 90/10's up front (Competition Engineering has some inexpensive ones) or even better a nice set of double adj. Strange or QA1's... Weight transfer is critical (to a point).
-Jeb
Anyway, drag racing an IAS car takes some work. Those of us that do it have paved the road for many to follow. Suspension alignment is critical with these cars... Sticks like 2-2.5 degrees of POSITIVE camber, autos tend to do best in the .5-1.5 range... You don't EVER want negative camber: when the car hits the tires it pushes them out in an arc. With negative camber you lose a HUGE amount of contact (you'll be trying to hook on the insides of the tires); with positive camber they will flat track and give you a complete contact patch. Remove or disconnect the front swaybar, add adj. heim joints to the rear swaybar so you can preload the right rear. GOOD shocks are a must if you're serious... At the very least a set of 90/10's up front (Competition Engineering has some inexpensive ones) or even better a nice set of double adj. Strange or QA1's... Weight transfer is critical (to a point).
-Jeb
-Jeb
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Anyway, drag racing an IAS car takes some work. Those of us that do it have paved the road for many to follow. Suspension alignment is critical with these cars... Sticks like 2-2.5 degrees of POSITIVE camber, autos tend to do best in the .5-1.5 range... You don't EVER want negative camber: when the car hits the tires it pushes them out in an arc. With negative camber you lose a HUGE amount of contact (you'll be trying to hook on the insides of the tires); with positive camber they will flat track and give you a complete contact patch. Remove or disconnect the front swaybar, add adj. heim joints to the rear swaybar so you can preload the right rear. GOOD shocks are a must if you're serious... At the very least a set of 90/10's up front (Competition Engineering has some inexpensive ones) or even better a nice set of double adj. Strange or QA1's... Weight transfer is critical (to a point).
-Jeb
I totally agree with you with the exception that from a mere simplicity factor and more importantly, durabilty, the removal of the IRS in strictly drag racing applications is the better choice. The camber issue disappears. The other advantage is that you end up with essentially a "short" four link suspension. Now you can load the rear with the links and/or the coil overs if you chose to use them instead of the transverse spring. Given that I am required to use the transverse, not afforded that option.
As far as shocks, I have been using a double adjustable Koni coil over with the coils removed very effectively. 60' in the 1.30s with a NHRA stock class L98.
My comment on the solid rear axle is as discussed above. For a pure drag car, I think the straight axle is far easier to run quick. With that being said, I am still running the cryo treated D44 on my car.
Aaron
My comment on the solid rear axle is as discussed above. For a pure drag car, I think the straight axle is far easier to run quick. With that being said, I am still running the cryo treated D44 on my car.
Aaron
http://www.nhra.com/tech_specs/engin...ts/CHEV-90.rtf
Basically a L98 with a stocker grind cam and headers. I use basically very loosely!
The transmission is a Scott McClay Engineering Turbo 200 with a A1 converter.
I totally agree with you with the exception that from a mere simplicity factor and more importantly, durabilty, the removal of the IRS in strictly drag racing applications is the better choice. The camber issue disappears. The other advantage is that you end up with essentially a "short" four link suspension. Now you can load the rear with the links and/or the coil overs if you chose to use them instead of the transverse spring. Given that I am required to use the transverse, not afforded that option.
As far as shocks, I have been using a double adjustable Koni coil over with the coils removed very effectively. 60' in the 1.30s with a NHRA stock class L98.

-Jeb


-Jeb
Yes, you can have an IRS in 8's & 9's, but I doubt an average racer could maintain or would want to maintain it.
I maintain my previous statement - so we agrea to disagrea.
It's aluminum.
What role does (or could) it play in the big picture of a drag IRS set-up?
Can any improvement be had in this piece?
I thought I saw a couple of fellow forum members here fabricate a new version C-beam out of ________?
(steel???)


save your self the time and money and put in a solid rear for anything faster that mid to high 10s just my 2 cents
Again it can be done, but EVERY time out be prepared to be replacing stuff or having your day cut short by a broken component. The U-Joints are the WEAK link in the setup - not the 1/2 shafts. I have only twisted up two 1/2 shafts in the last 6 years racing and hundreds of runs down the strip. And I always replace with used ones that came out of who knows what.
Not to mention the IRS is not the best for distributing power, there are angles involved and power is and will be robbed, its MUCH worse than a bad set pinion angle on a straight axle setup - because you can't get the launch optimized and the downtrack at the same time. '
Hooked up's car is a prime example of what you can do when you install a straight axle in one of these cars. Maintenance free for years going from high 1.3s to 1.28s in the 60' range.
For me going to the line and staging without the worry of breaking something is paramount. Unfortunately for me I struggle with spending 7k on a straight axle conversion - when you see ALL OUT DRAG cars completely setup being sold "rolling" for around 10K- and they weight about 2200lbs with driver. Put my motor in one of them and let it eat into the low 9s all day. Now with twins on the way, on the brink of buying a new home; neithers a good option
So I will make the D44 live another day. Again don't get me wrong, for the average racer who hit the track a few days a summer the D44 would be fine, but if you plan on running a points series or pounding it every weekend and have the funds to put a solid rear in - by all means do it.
To make a D44 live you need a min of the spool, good setup geometry so on launch your tires plan flat and some track time to get it all dialed in correctly.
yedi
http://www.bowtye8.tzo.com/bowtie8/
http://bowtye8.tzo.com/bowtie8/corve...20Ford%20Rear/













