When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Why cant tuners reflash a computer to OBD1, obd2 etc? Leave the wiring harnesses out of the equation for the moment. I just want to know why cant each computer be totally earaced and programed with whatever?
I ask this question because I want my 93 computer to have all the 94 abilities except maf. Sounds easy enough. Opinions please.
Why cant tuners reflash a computer to OBD1, obd2 etc? Leave the wiring harnesses out of the equation for the moment. I just want to know why cant each computer be totally earaced and programed with whatever?
I ask this question because I want my 93 computer to have all the 94 abilities except maf. Sounds easy enough. Opinions please.
That's like asking why can't my Hyundai go as fast as my Corvette if I change the software? Or, more to the point, why can't my SPARC run MacOS? Because the hardware is different.
For one thing, OBD2 requires an EEPROM, which is why they changed to that in 94. The 94 presumably has more I/O ports as well, since it has to deal with several more inputs than the 93, and perhaps more outputs (for instance for the SFI). I think the comms bus is at a different speed, but not sure about that.
Why cant tuners reflash a computer to OBD1, obd2 etc? Leave the wiring harnesses out of the equation for the moment. I just want to know why cant each computer be totally earaced and programed with whatever?
I ask this question because I want my 93 computer to have all the 94 abilities except maf. Sounds easy enough. Opinions please.
The hardware is totally different, and comm protocals to the CCM is different in 94/5 and then 96 is even different from the 94/5 PCMs. In 96 a crank sensor was added for mis-fire diagnostics, and additional memory was added to the PCM to handle the additional on board diagnostics for the OBD2 spec. If you really want a MAF you can use a f body 16188051 PCM and piggy back it to your 93 system. However its not really worth all the work and expense as there are no gains in performane provided that both systems are tuned properly for the modifications.
That's like asking why can't my Hyundai go as fast as my Corvette if I change the software? Or, more to the point, why can't my SPARC run MacOS? Because the hardware is different.
That's somewhat of a bit exaggerated dont you think lol.
Originally Posted by Vis Croceus
For one thing, OBD2 requires an EEPROM, which is why they changed to that in 94.
I thought the sole reason for dumping the chip was because the law said so. No more removable chips.
Originally Posted by Vis Croceus
The 94 presumably has more I/O ports as well, since it has to deal with several more inputs than the 93,
Wouldnt that be a moot point if I didnt use those imputs, like run in SD mode in a obd1?
Originally Posted by Vis Croceus
and perhaps more outputs (for instance for the SFI).
Explain more details on this
Originally Posted by Vis Croceus
I think the comms bus is at a different speed, but not sure about that.
The hardware is totally different, and comm protocals to the CCM is different in 94/5 and then 96 is even different from the 94/5 PCMs. In 96 a crank sensor was added for mis-fire diagnostics, and additional memory was added to the PCM to handle the additional on board diagnostics for the OBD2 spec. If you really want a MAF you can use a f body 16188051 PCM and piggy back it to your 93 system. However its not really worth all the work and expense as there are no gains in performane provided that both systems are tuned properly for the modifications.
Dangit. In my head it seemed so simple. This is going to sound retarded but the biggest reason I want OBD 1 is so I can use scanmaster. That thing was great. I wish they had something like that for the 93.
That's somewhat of a bit exaggerated dont you think lol.
No, actually, it's that simple.
Originally Posted by honda hunter
This is going to sound retarded but the biggest reason I want OBD 1 is so I can use scanmaster. That thing was great. I wish they had something like that for the 93.
93is OBD1.
OBD1 started in the early 80s. I would assume that every C4 is OBD.
94-95 is sometimes referred to as OBD1.5
If you want more info on the differences between 93 and 94, search this forum, the tuning forums at other LT1 sites, and Google. There's tons of info out there.
OBD1 started in the early 80s. I would assume that every C4 is OBD.
94-95 is sometimes referred to as OBD1.5
If you want more info on the differences between 93 and 94, search this forum, the tuning forums at other LT1 sites, and Google. There's tons of info out there.
Thanks for the good info. All I really want to know is how do I use a Scanmaster on a 93.
This may be dumb, but what is scanmaster? I have datamaster that I use for my 93 as well as a Auto xray.
Stand alone scan tool for OBD1 LT1 cars 94-97. It's great. I love being able to monitor so much stuff. Helps you see problems before they get bigger and just plain keeps you informed without having to go through the whole laptop sherade everytime. Really cool.
Dangit. In my head it seemed so simple. This is going to sound retarded but the biggest reason I want OBD 1 is so I can use scanmaster. That thing was great. I wish they had something like that for the 93.
You can use Datamaster which is just as good. And you can find an earlier hacked copy of version 3.4 or something like that on the internet.
You can use Datamaster which is just as good. And you can find an earlier hacked copy of version 3.4 or something like that on the internet.
Yup, got it the other day. Problem is I dont want to carry a Laptop everywhere though it is pretty small. The cool thing about the scanmaster was the size and the ease of use etc. Hmm, Can you use a PalmPilot or Pocket PC etc with Datamaster?
How is scanmaster on data logging? The problem with Auto X-Ray was it would log but only up to 2 scans a second for 15 seconds. Datamaster will log 10 scans a second for at least 30 min. or more. But I do see your point on carrying a laptop around.
How is scanmaster on data logging? The problem with Auto X-Ray was it would log but only up to 2 scans a second for 15 seconds. Datamaster will log 10 scans a second for at least 30 min. or more. But I do see your point on carrying a laptop around.
It really doesnt log anything. It will save the o2milivolt average at wot but will be eraced on the next run. After doing some more research doesnt look like I have a choice. Guess Ill have to find a decent place for the laptop in the car and something to charge it with.
well what I use for mine is a 30 dollar power inverter. You plug it into the cigerette lighter plug and it converts to 110volts. then just plug the laptop transformer into that.
well what I use for mine is a 30 dollar power inverter. You plug it into the cigerette lighter plug and it converts to 110volts. then just plug the laptop transformer into that.
I think that's that Ill end up doing. Thanks guys.