Weight Reduction (who has the lightest engine)
http://www.gilbertchevy.com/ChevyBar.../10185075.html
Not a bad price considering the savings. $4765 and 90 lbs off the front.
Last edited by mrc24x; Dec 30, 2006 at 09:00 AM.
A plastic intake for gen 1's would kick ***. There was one on the cover of a HotRod and the company was supposedly working on making a production unit.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Are you taking the motor apart at some point? I saved 8 lbs with a lightweight crank. Also, aluminum damper pulley, but I think I saw that mentioned above.
Have you gone through all fluid lines and hoses to remove unessary ones?
I was also going to mention valve covers, but again, Slalom beat me to the punch.
Bore it out to a 383 or 396, you'll save lots of weight in the block
- it pays to remove weight from the rotating assembly
- it pays to retain/add weight (in the form of stiffness) to the block
An example I like to cite states that removing 15 lbs of weight
from the engine's rotating assembly results in an improvement in
acceleration that is equivalent to a 32 HP gain. From the same
example, shaving 15 lbs of non-rotating weight from the engine
would only be equivalent to a 2 HP gain.
In a reply to my question about horsepower from blocks, GOSFAST
reports that he has observed that, relative to OEM blocks,
By the same token, aluminum blocks tend to be down some 40 HP.
- it pays to remove weight from the rotating assembly
- it pays to retain/add weight (in the form of stiffness) to the block
An example I like to cite states that removing 15 lbs of weight
from the engine's rotating assembly results in an improvement in
acceleration that is equivalent to a 32 HP gain. From the same
example, shaving 15 lbs of non-rotating weight from the engine
would only be equivalent to a 2 HP gain.
In a reply to my question about horsepower from blocks, GOSFAST
reports that he has observed that, relative to OEM blocks,
.
as for reducing rotating/reciprocating mass, it seems to help cars that road course race, more so than drag racing... i`ve seen many people install light flywheels, only to mixed results at the drag strip.. from only very small gains, to downright losses....
some of this has to do with the car being more difficult to launch well.
but you also have to understand the that heavier flywheels/rotating mass dont consume, but "store" energy, which must eventually be returned, to be delivered to the tires.
and since during drag racing, the engine is or is almost always under WOT conditions, as engergy is stored by heavier engine rotating mass, as engine speed climbs. but upon an upshift, the engine slows down, and much of the stored energy is released back to the drivetrain.
i`m not saying the reducing engine rotating mass is not benficial in drag racing, only that its more complex, and often not quite as beneficial as some believe it is...
now on other vehicle rotating components, such as wheels/tires, which are continuously accelerating during a drag race, can offer a clear advantage, as they dont return the energy they store until after the pass is complete....
Last edited by BigLee; Jan 3, 2007 at 10:54 AM.
NitrousSam
composite rods and they had titanium, aluminum and 4340 steel so that
you could compare the difference. I was BIG time impressed with the
weight savings but the cost for the rods was excessive for my personal
project.
Each ...
.
http://www.worldcastings.com/prods_pages/86110.htm
You can get Ti rods made by Crower as well. Have a custom titanium exhaust made.
I have seen sets of 8 on ebay for $2200
there is a set up there now.
there is a set of eagle TI rods for $2600 as well
short block, 4" stroke, with cam, timing set/cover(3 piece,heavy) 195
aluminum heads assembled w/rockers 36
Canton road race pan w/pump 29
So ~286 for long block.
The intake is going to be pretty hefty with the TB, fuel rails, injectors. (forgot to do it)
I will try to weigh the 400 iron block short block for comparison soon, it is a little harder to manuever onto a scale, to say the least.




















