When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
There is nothing within the 93 Tuner Cat program. I emailed them to see if it can be put in etc.
Turing the ASR works too, but it would be nice to have it on, in case....
Don't give away his software. If anybody who actually purchased the program needs an update they can just ask him for it.
Fair enough. I didnt know if maybe it was part of the free trial stuff etc.
It allows timing adjusmtents. I only looked at it for a split second, but the timing retard is up to 16 degrees in default on the tunercat. That may just be nothing, and not actual numbers GM uses, but it feels like it when it hits on the 93. It falls on its face pretty hard.
He is what my 94 is set to. I did make some changes to it at one stage but very small ones, and im not sure if they are on this .bin or if its the stock table
He is what my 94 is set to. I did make some changes to it at one stage but very small ones, and im not sure if they are on this .bin or if its the stock table
Hope you can all read the numbers on that.....
Explain how these numbers work. Do they retard it back to this number written in there in the table? ie at 2800 rpm if traction control is needed it goes back to 33 degrees BTDC
I pulled about 10-15 degrees out... in other words subtracted from the numbers listed...
It means at 2800 rpms it will pull up too 33 degrees.. So to get it to where you have less traction control applied you subtract the number. If you want more traction control you add to the number.
It will allow you to punch it more " before it starts to pull it away...
Those numbers are similar to what i have on my 96...
Mo
Last edited by Mo_Bandy; Feb 15, 2007 at 01:33 AM.
I pulled about 10-15 degrees out... in other words subtracted from the numbers listed...
It means at 2800 rpms it will pull up too 33 degrees.. So to get it to where you have less traction control applied you subtract the number. If you want more traction control you add to the number.
It will allow you to punch it more " before it starts to pull it away...
Those numbers are similar to what i have on my 96...
Mo
So at 2800 rpm I would want it to pull "20" if I wanted 13 less than the 33, so it wont back the power down as much?
Explain how these numbers work. Do they retard it back to this number written in there in the table? ie at 2800 rpm if traction control is needed it goes back to 33 degrees BTDC
No what it means is that is how much retard it can use(the number in the ubove tables will be subtracted from the total advance at the given time), so at 2,800rpm it can cut the timing by 33*, so depending on what your advance is at that point, you could be back down somewhere between 2-10* advance. Which explains the "falling on its face".
Originally Posted by steve40th
So at 2800 rpm I would want it to pull "20" if I wanted 13 less than the 33, so it wont back the power down as much?
Yeah mate, give that a go to start with, it you find its not cutting down enough add some retard back on, or if you feel that its still taking too much power off you then take some more retard out of it.
No what it means is that is how much retard it can use(the number in the ubove tables will be subtracted from the total advance at the given time), so at 2,800rpm it can cut the timing by 33*, so depending on what your advance is at that point, you could be back down somewhere between 2-10* advance. Which explains the "falling on its face".
Yeah mate, give that a go to start with, it you find its not cutting down enough add some retard back on, or if you feel that its still taking too much power off you then take some more retard out of it.
Thanks, Some times computers need to be talked to differently, like me. I only have 10 fingers and 10 toes so it takes a while.
We all started "somewhere..."... don't sweat it... it is better to be doubly sure than mess sommething ups... Case, filled in the blanks.
Let us know how it goes. if you like I can give you what I have programmed in.. but I'm perhaps running a little more power so you may not want to pull as much as I did..
We all started "somewhere..."... don't sweat it... it is better to be doubly sure than mess sommething ups... Case, filled in the blanks.
Let us know how it goes. if you like I can give you what I have programmed in.. but I'm perhaps running a little more power so you may not want to pull as much as I did..
regards,
Mo
Hey mo, you have just a "little" more power .
I will try the tune this weekend with the ASR function toned downa bit.
I know the power will be backed off with the timing it adjusts, but will it affect the brakes and throttle kick back based on the changes?
I also backed the timing off quite a bit, to start.
Hey mo, you have just a "little" more power .
I will try the tune this weekend with the ASR function toned downa bit.
I know the power will be backed off with the timing it adjusts, but will it affect the brakes and throttle kick back based on the changes?
I also backed the timing off quite a bit, to start.
Don't expect major changes through the timing tables. Keep in mind that that portion of the ASR can be completely disabled by checking the "Traction Control Off" switch parameter. I did this and the ASR was then more active than ever with the throttle closing and the brake application. Now if you went the other way and had it pull out a ton of timing, then there would be less throttle closing and brake application, but the net result would still be about the same.
Scott
Max mentioned what I said earlier in the post , if you totally turn off the ASR it acts weird...
By pulling the timing in the ASR parameter the throttle and brake effect will be less...
I did not totally pull mine as if I valet the car of someone is working on it i didn't want them to "beat" it...
As i mentioned I pulled about 12-15 degrees in the middle primarily.
If I am actually racing i just turn off the switch.
You can look at your logs when you run and corelate the rpms with you timing and get an idea how much to pull back if you chose to leave the ASR engaged during heavy acceleration. With my ASR on it pretty much limits me to about 5 pounds of boost.
Feel free to pm or email if you need more help.
Best regards,
MO
Last edited by Mo_Bandy; Feb 17, 2007 at 01:14 AM.