When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
86 corvette. I understand the gap should be set at .035.
Will it hurt anything to set it at .040? Any change in the way my car will run or air/fuel? .035 just doesn't look right. Thanks
GM doesn't set their gap dimensions on looks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have been setting my plug gaps at .035 for as long as I have been driving cars (45 years) and they all drove fine! .040 will still work.
GM doesn't set their gap dimensions on looks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I have been setting my plug gaps at .035 for as long as I have been driving cars (45 years) and they all drove fine! .040 will still work.
That is very true. I've had no trouble with the .035 gapping at all, nor .040.
From: One day you're a Comet...the next day you're dust... Arkansas
Originally Posted by Sleeper90
86 corvette. I understand the gap should be set at .035.
Will it hurt anything to set it at .040? Any change in the way my car will run or air/fuel? .035 just doesn't look right. Thanks
Matt
Why don't you try .075, it might look really cool!
Our stock HEI is know to drop off (voltage) above 4k RPM, which usually isn't a problem with stock TPI intake.
I have modified the stock TPI intake to breathe well into the 5k RPM range, so I installed a HyperTech coil/cap/rotor and now gap about .047". This setup puts out 55kV well into the 5k RPM range and so will support wider plug gap.
dont know if you a have stock set up or not ,but plug gaps wear open, not closed. so if you like changeing plugs, and it looks better to you... go for it!
What is the detriment of going with a smaller gap? I have asked this question before, but no one seems to have an answer.
I currently run 0.031" and would like to go down to 0.028" or 0.029". Thoughts?
Aaron
First, why do you want to run a smaller gap? Is the car not running properly? Or do you just feel like shortening the gap? Unless your car is modded that requires the gap to be altered from its factory setting, leave it at the factory's recommendation. Those gap numbers are there for a reason.
What is the detriment of going with a smaller gap? I have asked this question before, but no one seems to have an answer.
I currently run 0.031" and would like to go down to 0.028" or 0.029". Thoughts?
Aaron
The only detriment I know of is with the tighter gap you will get a tiny bit of rough idle...my 93 calls for .050 but I have gapped my plugs at .030 for 4 years now...
I drag race my car constantly and at WOT the tighter gap is a dream...I never have to worry about a miss and it runs smooth as glass at WOT...I replaced my last set of plugs after 2 years of hard racing...they came out looking perfect and new...I almost put them back in but since they were already out I went ahead and put a new set in...wth, I use Autolite's for like $10.00 a set...lol
First, why do you want to run a smaller gap? Is the car not running properly? Or do you just feel like shortening the gap? Unless your car is modded that requires the gap to be altered from its factory setting, leave it at the factory's recommendation. Those gap numbers are there for a reason.
I was having issues with "snuffing" the spark at 0.035" at ~4800RPM, so I switched to 0.031" and I still snuff the spark at ~56-5800RPM. I am thinking that 0.028-0.029" would get me up to 6300. I guess it is just trial and error.
Originally Posted by Fuzzy Dice
The only detriment I know of is with the tighter gap you will get a tiny bit of rough idle...my 93 calls for .050 but I have gapped my plugs at .030 for 4 years now...
I drag race my car constantly and at WOT the tighter gap is a dream...I never have to worry about a miss and it runs smooth as glass at WOT...I replaced my last set of plugs after 2 years of hard racing...they came out looking perfect and new...I almost put them back in but since they were already out I went ahead and put a new set in...wth, I use Autolite's for like $10.00 a set...lol
I used to run Autolite's and switched a few years ago to the Champion plugs. I run the MSD6AL and feel like I have adequate voltage, just need to get this spark "snuffing" thing under control.
The reason for wider gap, cut-back electrodes, indexing the plugs and such is to expose more of the cylinder charge to the flame front, resulting in a more complete burn.
So long as your HEI is not dropping off in spark intensity with high RPM, there is no advantage to gapping tighter.
Are you sure it's "snuffing" the spark at 5,800rpm or is the spark intensity level dropping off?? Put her on a spark analyzer and run up the RPM should show the story.
Are you sure it's "snuffing" the spark at 5,800rpm or is the spark intensity level dropping off?? Put her on a spark analyzer and run up the RPM should show the story.
Yeah, I am pretty certain, as I have a MSD6AL and it was fine until I upped the boost past 15 psi. It will pull fine through 20 psi, but seems to "snuff" the spark at just over 20psi (which also corresponds to ~5600-5800RPM).
.032~.035 was used with the old point style ignition systems.
Remember those? THe ones you could hang onto a bare plug wire with the engine running?
I want a nice, big, fat spark, not a little, teeny weenie spark.
The HEI will throw a spark about TWO inches long at atmospheric pressure.
It can jump 40-45 thousandths easily at 150~180 psi.
I'd suppose GM has a multi-million buck 'Spark Adjuticating Machine' at their disposal to test their ignition systems.
I'd also bet there is some nice math that can predict the heat generated by spark gaps of various dimensions at different pressures and voltages.
Sometimes, I like to rely on information generated by the engineers particularly when the engineers have gigantic bucks at their disposal to test the theory they come up with. Not to mention a boatload of PhD's that can resolve just about everything to a boxfull of numbers.