Which TPI Intake
If you're lucky, and portwork is done right, you gain some higher rpm horsepower without giving away much low/mid rpm torque. Well ported TPI intakes "should" extend that dreaded TPI "wall" beyond that 4500 rpm mark. Mine seems to do it as I predicted it would. For someone like myself who didn't want a high rpm screamer, that is a great option even though some people still look down at it. On a daily driver type car, I'll trade BROAD USEABLE POWER for little used top end HP anyday...That's the exact reason I used small runner (but high velocity) heads, stock cam w/1.6's, small tube headers, tpi intake, etc...
which an intake performs well for a given package of components.
A lot of information is available on the subject - here is a quick primer.
that make up the existing OEM TPI, there are other intake choices to
consider which address the issue of runner length.
In order of decreasing runner length there are the
- Accel/Lingenfelter Super Ram (aka SR)
- Holley Stealth Ram (aka HSR)
- Single Plane converted to EFI (aka SP)
- TPiS MiniRam (aka MR)
- Converted LT1 intake
Each choice has benefits and drawbacks. They have all been discussed
extensively in this forum (and others). The 'Advanced Search' tool
with the Archive flag set will bring forth hours of reading pleasure.
Currently, the SR appears to be temporarily out of production until
further notice, used ones become available from time to time.
The HSR works well but does not fit under a stock hood. Custom
plenums that permit the hood to close have been tried, but never
with unqualified success. A hood scoop or raised hood will permit
the HSR to function in a C4 as Holley intended.
The SP requires a custom plenum/elbow in addition to the EFI conversion
of adding fuel injector bungs and so on to the manifold. At least
two or three CF members have chosen this route.
The MR has runners that are short enough that the torque characteristics
of the L98 are lowered and the RPM range elevated noticably. Manual
trans owners enjoy them, auto owners are not quite as convinced.
I do not have one and can only go by the discussions from back in
the day when SR vs MR threads used to be common.
The converted LT1 requires a manifold, the resources to convert it
and then the means to adapt it to a non-reverse flow engine. I
believe it is otherwise similar in characteristics to the MR.
.
With the focus on runner diameter, some consideration about the
other aspects of intake tuning seemed due.
In some ways, the question is pointless because the alternatives
to runner/base changes & porting the OEM components are no longer
readily available or are too expensive relative to the overall vehicle
to really be viable alternatives.
But it doesn't hurt to consider the aspects of diameter, length and
plenum volume along with the intakes that were developed to optimize
them.
No put-down intended to anyone.
.

THose SLP's sure do give you some 'MEAT' to chew on though.
We all want the same thing anything.
MORE POWER and MORE MONEY, LOL.
Oh let's don't forget MORE TIME to enjoy our toys.
Last edited by VetNutJim; Mar 25, 2007 at 12:42 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts










