When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Cool keep us posted ! My .02 would be to open up the main and rod bearings a bit more than stock. The stock clearances are on the tight side which results in a lot of bearing failures when the LT1 is modified.
Cool keep us posted ! My .02 would be to open up the main and rod bearings a bit more than stock. The stock clearances are on the tight side which results in a lot of bearing failures when the LT1 is modified.
Agreed on the rods - we opened up the rod clearances to .025 from the spec of .014 - .018. I'm not convinced that the main bearing clearance is a factor, so those are at the high limit.
My guess is you will be well above your goals in both HP and TQ. Probably cloaser to 450 at the FW in both TQ and HP. If you get a few Exrtra $$ I would get the heads CNC ported.
My guess is you will be well above your goals in both HP and TQ. Probably cloaser to 450 at the FW in both TQ and HP. If you get a few Exrtra $$ I would get the heads CNC ported.
With the stock heads and HOTCAM, I think the numbers are right in there. 450HP would be within reach with better heads like AFRs.
It's not so much the powered metal rods, it the stock bolts that are junk.
You might find the HotCam a little too mild for a 383. it's actually kinda mild for a 350.
Not sure about the rod comment - I haven't heard of any PM rod failures, and GMPP sells them as the new "pink" rod. The factory clearances are definitely tight, though.
This wasn't a max-performance build as it's a daily driver - definitely agree that there were stronger cam choices available.
I think it will be tough getting 400 fwhp out of that combination unless you have a full after market exhaust and headers.. The hotcam is too small for a stroker.. mine idles like a stationwagon.. see sig for my mods and dyno results.. (granted this is on the dyno known as "the heartbreaker").
Also, I should note I used the stock rods but with ARP rod bolts and the stock clearances.. its been strong for the last 40k miles or so... it is my daily driver!
I think it will be tough getting 400 fwhp out of that combination unless you have a full after market exhaust and headers.. The hotcam is too small for a stroker.. mine idles like a stationwagon.. see sig for my mods and dyno results.. (granted this is on the dyno known as "the heartbreaker").
CIA Tri-Y's + exhaust
Again, not a max performance build - I drive this thing every day.
With the stock heads and HOTCAM, I think the numbers are right in there. 450HP would be within reach with better heads like AFRs.
Many LT1 HC 350's are above 400FWHP and not far off on TQ with ported stock heads, take a look at Nathens combo for a refernce, just one example. The HC is a mild Cam for a 383 but should be a great daily driver. Guess we will see but I would expect 360-370 RWHP/RWTQ out of that combo with a good tune. Just a note if I remember correctly those pistons with a 4.030 bore and 3.75 stroke are closer to 10.7:1 with the stock heads and stock gaskets.
Many LT1 HC 350's are above 400FWHP and not far off on TQ with ported stock heads, take a look at Nathens combo for a refernce, just one example. The HC is a mild Cam for a 383 but should be a great daily driver. Guess we will see but I would expect 360-370 RWHP/RWTQ out of that combo with a good tune. Just a note if I remember correctly those pistons with a 4.030 bore and 3.75 stroke are closer to 10.7:1 with the stock heads and stock gaskets.
I will be going to the chassis dyno afterwards, so we will see
The engine is zero-decked and I'm using the FelPro .039 compressed gasket. The aluminum heads are 54cc and I took a mild cut on the head, so I should be right around 11:1
From: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Originally Posted by billla
Not sure about the rod comment - I haven't heard of any PM rod failures, and GMPP sells them as the new "pink" rod. The factory clearances are definitely tight, though.
This wasn't a max-performance build as it's a daily driver - definitely agree that there were stronger cam choices available.
With a stock bottom end, if you bump the rev limiter too much, you'll spin a rod bearing for sure. I've know too many people who have done it.
With a stock bottom end, if you bump the rev limiter too much, you'll spin a rod bearing for sure. I've know too many people who have done it.
ARP studs in the mains with an align hone, rotating ***'y balanced, and a rev limit of 5700. I have 3.73 gears, so it really puts this big beast in the sweet spot of the engine.
I'm using a Melling 10552 high pressure, 10% increase in volume pump with a 3/4" pickup with the stock pan and windage tray (1" longer ARP studs to clear the stroker).
Cool keep us posted ! My .02 would be to open up the main and rod bearings a bit more than stock. The stock clearances are on the tight side which results in a lot of bearing failures when the LT1 is modified.