When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a '92 LT-1 with LT-4 intake and heads. The intake has a groove to accommodate the later style fuel rails (i.e. where each side of the rail is connected at both ends of the intake.).
Has anyone know whether the 1992 style is upgradeable or if I can get replacement fuel rails? (I'm also considering an AFPR).
Also - what (if any) are the benefits of the later style fuel rails?
I am looking for answers to this also, as I have a 94 manifold, and with the 93 rails in my Vette they dont fit as well as they did on the 93 manifold. So, I am subscribing to this.
And, did your rails bolt down okay? ANd what injectors are you using?
I would update to the 94-96 Vette style fuel rails. I did when installing later style manifold. F body rails exit to the wrong side so don't get those.
Also - what (if any) are the benefits of the later style fuel rails?
I suspect that if you log right and left side AFR, there will be a difference on the old design, but I don't know how much. The old design uses a coaxial (tube inside of tube) arrangement on one of the rails to feed the balance tube in the back. Last summer I ran the Kent Moore injector test set on my car (92). It applies a calibrated pulse train on each injector. You monitor pressure drop from a charged rail for each and compare readings to verify each injector's flow rate is comparable to the rest. I got IIRC consistant 2-3 PSI difference between the two rails, indicating to me that that design is restricing flow to the injectors on one side of the engine. I should mention this was done with 30# SVO injectors installed, @ stock flow rates the problem should be somewhat less pronounced. The Kent Moore tool may also be pushing an injector duty cycle you wouldn't normally see in real world driving. But then again, GM wouldn't have changed the intake, rails, and FRC in 94 for no reason at all...
Can you make a cross over tube up front with AN fittings etc?
If you had a set of 94-96 rails, a TIG welder, and the skills to weld the existing balance tube openings on both rails shut to accomodate new end fittings and a crossover hose, sure. Most would find a later intake a cheaper, easier route. Whether or not it's even worthwhile is still in question.
The welding and all that is easy where I work. I have a manifold thats a 93 I am buying, thats been ported etc for my 396. I am looking at keeping my rails, fuel rail covers etc etc. I can sell my 94 manifold, ported and polished easily I hope.
I have seen someone who did do a crossover, cant remember who.
I was thinking, put a AN screw in fitting into the rail at each side and braided fuel line going from one side to the other?
Or just realize, I dont have a track and live with what I have
If you're starting with the 93 rails, you'll also have to figure out how to remove the inner copper tube that is obstructing the fuel flow in the first place.
If you're starting with the 93 rails, you'll also have to figure out how to remove the inner copper tube that is obstructing the fuel flow in the first place.
Is this tube like a bushing throughout each side of the rails?