Spring oiler valve covers





they are plumbed special to oil the springs, and the roller rockers direct
http://www.drysump.com/valvcvr.htm
provides when directed at the valve springs. Lift and RPM create
significant heat in the springs.
Bypassing the push rods also helps reduce valve train weight.
As for the roller rockers, my vote is that these don't benefit much
from feeding oil through passages and jets in the covers.
.
.800 lift. That is the lift range that starts to make heat provided it sees
enough RPM for extended periods of time. Oil cooling efficiency is about
10% of water but when you need it you'll take whatever you can get.
been meaning to rebut his comments above.
If someone didn't know otherwise, GG's remarks would leave them
with the impression that spring oilers are an esoteric addition
with a very limited range of application, ie: max effort engines
with 0.800"(+) valve lift.
In fact, springs generate heat at much lower lifts than 0.800".
Anytime there is work, heat is produced. If enough heat develops
in the springs then they will begin to anneal and lose their ability
to control valve motion.
Spring oilers were found to be useful long before the lifts seen
now became possible.
Perhaps modern materials and processes used today for springs makes
them able to endure higher temperatures before beginning to anneal,
but I don't think there will be so much difference as to prevent springs
operating at 0.500-0.600 in endurance applications from benefiting by
application of direct oil cooling. Especially if oil through the push rods
has been restricted.
As for the efficiency of oil cooling, relative to that of water - this is
a Red Herring. I know of no practical way to directly water-cool
valve springs. Even if direct water cooling were possible,
characteristics of oil are superior to those of water for cooling
objects such as valve springs. For instance, water boils at 100ºC
(212ºF.) and is corrosive.
Oil serves as an effective cooling agent elsewhere throughout the
engine, it can do so equally efficiently for valve springs.
.
been meaning to rebut his comments above.
If someone didn't know otherwise, GG's remarks would leave them
with the impression that spring oilers are an esoteric addition
with a very limited range of application, ie: max effort engines
with 0.800"(+) valve lift.
In fact, springs generate heat at much lower lifts than 0.800".
Anytime there is work, heat is produced. If enough heat develops
in the springs then they will begin to anneal and lose their ability
to control valve motion.
Spring oilers were found to be useful long before the lifts seen
now became possible.
Perhaps modern materials and processes used today for springs makes
them able to endure higher temperatures before beginning to anneal,
but I don't think there will be so much difference as to prevent springs
operating at 0.500-0.600 in endurance applications from benefiting by
application of direct oil cooling. Especially if oil through the push rods
has been restricted.
As for the efficiency of oil cooling, relative to that of water - this is
a Red Herring. I know of no practical way to directly water-cool
valve springs. Even if direct water cooling were possible,
characteristics of oil are superior to those of water for cooling
objects such as valve springs. For instance, water boils at 100ºC
(212ºF.) and is corrosive.
Oil serves as an effective cooling agent elsewhere throughout the
engine, it can do so equally efficiently for valve springs.
.
Infact the first time we ever used any was in the very late 1980's when we had a rash of good ole Comp Cams "Pacoloy" valve springs breaking every other week. Quite baffeling at the time as those springs had worked great for us for almost to 10yrs with no problems and were still considered my most engine builders to be the best spring money could buy. You couldn't buy better valve springs, oil temp was still in check, no bottom end oiling problems just breaking springs like crazy so what to do...
Turns out years of increasing valve lifts, increasing engine RPM, and more aggressive cam lobe profiles cuppled with the standard (for the time) SBC "restricted cam/top end oiling system" was a big factor in killing them. Of course old spring technology was a factor as well. K-Motion H-11 tool steel springs AND the use of spring oilers solved our spring problems for about another 4-5 yrs, then we moved on and moved on about 3yrs after that and so on. Anyway history is just that history. People like PAC, ISKY, K-Motion and PSI have ramped spring technology up so much (along with better oiling systems, better oil, ect) we don't have to run spring oilers on anything but our endurance engines and these are far more restriced (actually integrated into our T&D rockers) than the valve cover "sprinkler system" of the good/bad ole days.
However we have to keep things in context as to their application. NEVER in my life have I ever seen a hyd roller cam that had lobe acceleration rates, lift and the ability to turn enough RPM that would require spring oilers, unless you were way off base with your spring selection in the first place in which case it would be a parts selection problem much more easily solved with the proper springs. Also (NO OFFENSE TO BRIAN or the engine he is building) but a 23degree standard SBC with a stock oiling system is going to pump as much oil to the rockers and valve springs as it could ever need. The last thing it would need is more oil spraying around in the valve covers instead of oiling the rods and mains. Even with the Blower (if it runs off of the engine oiling system) all you would need is a good oil cooler, the correct cyl wall finish, ring end gap and proper oil pan to keep oil temp in check.
These valve cover spring oilers have their place. IN OVAL TRACK ENGINES ABOUT 10YRS AGO.
Will
Last edited by Greg Gore; Dec 27, 2007 at 04:57 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I have oilers on my 434, with a .682 mechanical roller cam. They give me a sense of security when I run it really hard for a good amount of time and often.
Last edited by yedister; Dec 15, 2019 at 11:11 AM.
I have oilers on my 434, with a .682 mechanical roller cam. They give me a sense of security when I run it really hard for a good amount of time and often.
Last edited by Bill Chase; Dec 18, 2020 at 04:42 AM.











