LS2 into C4
This came off of the GV website. Not sure who's right.
Why would you spend all that time and money to swap to an LS2 and NOT use the fuel injection? The FI setups on LSx motors are very, very powerful and flexible. You can tune it to run with all but the most extreme engines. If you want a carb'ed motor, why not just keep an SBC and avoid a lot of wasted time/money?
Now, this is direct from John Lingenfelters book:
"Many enthusiasts mistakenly believe there is some magic to electronic fuel injection that is worth instant horsepower. This is not the case. An engines ability to generate power is simply the result of its airflow, combustion and exhaust capabilities. intake manifolding directly affects both airflow and tuning and therefore can significantly change the engines powerband. Whether there is an advantage to how fuel is introduced, either from a fuel injector or by carburator, has little real effect on horsepower."
That's directly from John Lingenfelter. He goes on to tell about an EFI to carb comparison he made that showed less than 5hp difference between the same engine w/both carb and EFI.
Yes EFI can be more efficient in the midrange and part throttle operation. It's also harder and more intensive to get properly set up. I simply offered the carbed LSx as a possible option for the guy who doesnt wanna fight his wiring harness.
Now, this is direct from John Lingenfelters book:
"Many enthusiasts mistakenly believe there is some magic to electronic fuel injection that is worth instant horsepower. This is not the case. An engines ability to generate power is simply the result of its airflow, combustion and exhaust capabilities. intake manifolding directly affects both airflow and tuning and therefore can significantly change the engines powerband. Whether there is an advantage to how fuel is introduced, either from a fuel injector or by carburator, has little real effect on horsepower."
That's directly from John Lingenfelter. He goes on to tell about an EFI to carb comparison he made that showed less than 5hp difference between the same engine w/both carb and EFI.
Yes EFI can be more efficient in the midrange and part throttle operation. It's also harder and more intensive to get properly set up. I simply offered the carbed LSx as a possible option for the guy who doesnt wanna fight his wiring harness.
I never said the FI would make more power, but I know the FI is very flexible, reliable, provides just as much power as the carb, while providing lower emissions and better fuel economy. Since we are talking about swapping an engine into a chassis that it wasn't intended to go in, why half-*** it and throw a carb on it?
I say do it once, do it right. The wiring isn't hard, just time consuming. Spend the time getting it setup right, and then you won't have to touch it for quite some time.

I can't wait for the Brave one that will install a LS9 (Blown ZR1) in a C4.
Carbon Fiber brakes etc...
Look at the 2003 retro. Looks like a 53. People pay, people always pay
I never said the FI would make more power, but I know the FI is very flexible, reliable, provides just as much power as the carb, while providing lower emissions and better fuel economy. Since we are talking about swapping an engine into a chassis that it wasn't intended to go in, why half-*** it and throw a carb on it?
I say do it once, do it right. The wiring isn't hard, just time consuming. Spend the time getting it setup right, and then you won't have to touch it for quite some time.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
personally, while it does sound cool, I think shifting out of a split 2nd gear into 3rd, and shutting off the split at the same time will get old real quick. maybe you can make some usefull mean of switching it that does not seem so un-user freindly.
personally, while it does sound cool, I think shifting out of a split 2nd gear into 3rd, and shutting off the split at the same time will get old real quick. maybe you can make some usefull mean of switching it that does not seem so un-user freindly.
A carb is the easy way out, simply because you don't want to learn about the new technology, and for a DD it leaves performance on the table (whether it be mileage, throttle response, etc). If we are talking about an SBC with a 20 year old TPI, it would be different, but LS2 FI is really, really good. If you want 475 hp with a carb, why bother with LSx at all?
Don't get me wrong here: I'm not saying a carb can't do it or won't make the power, but the FI is just awesome, and the car is already setup with an FI fuel system, so it is just that much easier. Again, if this was a car that originally had a carb, I could see your point better, but it has the pump, tank, and lines for FI-use them!
Last edited by Mojave; Jan 17, 2008 at 12:59 AM.
As for a carbed LSx clearing the hood, a drop base breather might work, i really don't have an answer there.
We did the 85 that is in CE magazine. My wife now drives the car everyday. It has just over 6,000 miles since August and the maiden voyage from FL to PA (Carlisle).
Is it worth the money? That is up to the individual owner.
What I can tell you is this.
My wife uses it every day, rain or shine. It makes an honest to goodness - no guessing needed 400 hp and 400 ft lbs of tq. It gets mid to high 20's on the highway, idles smooth as glass - and pumps freezing cold a/c at a flick of a switch.
Throttle response is amazing - and there is NO guess work. The motor is under full warranty (Crate from GM) and the car performs exactly as a C4 with the performance of a 2007. There is no choppy idle, stinky exhaust, or rattle/rumble/stall/surge issues that are common on any highly modified TPI C4 reaching 400 hp.
Cruise, a/c, digital gauges, and diagnostics are all in working order.
We did go and put stock LT1 style mufflers on the car because the Vortex were too loud for her taste.
Sleeper? You bet. Getting traction is the only trick. Fast...I really can't imagine a DAILY DRIVER with more power than this...all under the clam shell.
So - we proved it can be done with virtually no compromise (all we lost was the average and instant fuel economy feature).
A stick would be more exciting - but the car was an auto to start and I didn't want to re-invent the wheel there. It is nice to have a cold drink in one hand, wheel in the other, mash the throttle and let the shift kit and 3K stall bang through the gears though. My other vette is a six speed - so I can get the rowing out of my system when I feel the need.
We did the 85 that is in CE magazine. My wife now drives the car everyday. It has just over 6,000 miles since August and the maiden voyage from FL to PA (Carlisle).
Is it worth the money? That is up to the individual owner.
What I can tell you is this.
My wife uses it every day, rain or shine. It makes an honest to goodness - no guessing needed 400 hp and 400 ft lbs of tq. It gets mid to high 20's on the highway, idles smooth as glass - and pumps freezing cold a/c at a flick of a switch.
Throttle response is amazing - and there is NO guess work. The motor is under full warranty (Crate from GM) and the car performs exactly as a C4 with the performance of a 2007. There is no choppy idle, stinky exhaust, or rattle/rumble/stall/surge issues that are common on any highly modified TPI C4 reaching 400 hp.
Cruise, a/c, digital gauges, and diagnostics are all in working order.
We did go and put stock LT1 style mufflers on the car because the Vortex were too loud for her taste.
Sleeper? You bet. Getting traction is the only trick. Fast...I really can't imagine a DAILY DRIVER with more power than this...all under the clam shell.
So - we proved it can be done with virtually no compromise (all we lost was the average and instant fuel economy feature).
A stick would be more exciting - but the car was an auto to start and I didn't want to re-invent the wheel there. It is nice to have a cold drink in one hand, wheel in the other, mash the throttle and let the shift kit and 3K stall bang through the gears though. My other vette is a six speed - so I can get the rowing out of my system when I feel the need.
That's cool. Thanks for the feedback on the article. Cost wise, you need to contact Jared direct at current performance. The harness will be direct fit so you don't have to cut and splice and custom for your application.
Otherwise, the motor mounts, hoses, raw stock steel supplies for fabrication were all just nickle and dime stuff to slam it in. I would say total cost of hoses, mounts, metal, etc. were all under $200. The rest of the expense was the motor/trans/accesories/harness.
I am a tad apprehensive about this portion of the project as the car runs so well right now and is plenty fast. GM rates the performance package at 480 hp around 6,500. That is enough to twist the car in two without other major mods to support. If it isn't driven hard all the time, it won't matter. However I know gas mileage will suffer and it will have a thump idle, and possible surge or other issues that are common when you push the envelope.
So - we don't have it on the calendar yet. We may put it all in to see what it does, dyno it out - drive around, then remove the parts in favor of the LS2 stuff.
The only thing I have to compare it to is my 69 Camaro. I have a SLP Stage III modified LS1 in that car. It is a fairly radical (for street use) cam, LS6 intake, highly modified LS6 heads - headers, 36# injectors...etc. While the car will blister the pavement and put a smile on your face that lasts all day...it suffers from rough idle, etc. It is a drive by cable and from time to time will stall as the IAC has trouble compensating for the air needs (not cool). However, it still gets 25 mpg on the highway and 16 in town (I drive the Camaro every day right now).
So...we will see.













