When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
i know you cant safely bore and stroke an lt1/4 block to over 396ci. my question is does anyone like dart or motown make a 400 smallblock that would accept lt4 intake and heads? im curious if there is a way to safely get 427+cid out of an ltx even if it isnt a stock block.
I believe that the 400 block uses the same intake and heads as the 350. Might be wrong on that count though.
IMHO, if youre going over 400cu, go ahead and go all out with a miniram or something like that. Also, with that much displacement youll probably want 195cc heads or something like that, depending on where you want the power.
anyone else know about this?
im having trouble when looking at aftermarket blocks knowing if they are genII or not. like i said, i know you cant safely bore and stroke a LT motor bigger than 396 but was curious if there was an aftermarket block out there that would let you do it. if you have an LS you can either sleeve ur cylinders to get big cubes or go the C5R block route or get an LSX block. i was curious if we had any kind of options like this with a GenII block that would still accept LT components like heads and intake. does that make sense?
Not that I am aware of. Check with the block manufacturers, directly. I think without getting ridiculous, that a 4.00" stroke in a 4.030" to 4.060" bore is about all you'll get with a Gen II foundation. You could forgo the advancements of the opti spark and the camshaft driven reverse flow water pump and go back to a Gen I.
No one makes a Gen II aftermarket block AFAIK. Go with an aftermarket block, good heads, and a single plane or miniram. You'll spend less $$ in the long run and make the same or more power.
There is 1, again 1, aluminum Bow Tie Block GM made for LT1/4 engines. There is 1 guy who has and has done nothing, absolutely nothing with it. Its probably rotting away.
But it was a 4.125 bore.
Imagine if GM had produced a normal run of those.
I seem to recall some folks stroking LTs with a 4" crank for 409". Just a little more involved than the 3.875" (396"). Consider it a "small bore" 434. (or a really small bore 454).
There is 1, again 1, aluminum Bow Tie Block GM made for LT1/4 engines. There is 1 guy who has and has done nothing, absolutely nothing with it. Its probably rotting away.
But it was a 4.125 bore.
Imagine if GM had produced a normal run of those.
If I had it, I would have done a second mortgage and dropped it off with a BIG list of **** at LPE, so I know it would be built right.
I wish I had it.
There is 1, again 1, aluminum Bow Tie Block GM made for LT1/4 engines. There is 1 guy who has and has done nothing, absolutely nothing with it. Its probably rotting away.
But it was a 4.125 bore.
Imagine if GM had produced a normal run of those.
There are no aftermarket LTx blocks. I tried to have one made a while ago with a few other orders but no one would do it...too expensive.
GM did make an LTx "LeMans" style block that had a lot of "meat" to it and could be safely taken out over 400ci, but these blocks were technically illegal for racing use (even though they were used). There were very few of them made and there is only 1 left that I know of, and the person that has it cannot sell it per GM.
I would love to get my hands on a 427 LTx, but I don't ever see that happening.
4" or 4.125" stroke crank in a LTx factory block. 4" stroke is fairly easy (though costly), but the 4.125" stroke requires a lot more work and a LOT more money. I have built two of the 4.125" strokers, and a handful of the 4" strokers in both L98 and LTx version.
There are quite a few 409 LT's out there. Used to be a local guy here in Houston named Phil that owned CXI racing. He supposedly had a 421 LTx engine. Made some car magazine with it and "claimed" 600hp n/a and 1000 with nitrous. Engine had a drivetrain failure at 40mph crusing down the road and wiped out engine.
Ah yes, we all remember Phil. With mom's pocketbook we could all open a shop. I never saw the car run, but he showed it quite a bit. And yes, it was in a nice magazine spread.
guess it looks like i will stick with the 396 route in the end. simple and common enough to get that displacement. lots of parts made for it and i know it should still be reliable. and i would think if you had good enough heads on it, you could still get some awesome numbers out of it. i dont know if anyone has built a ***** to the wall LT block since AFR has re-engeneered the 227 "eliminator" series. in the right configuration they flow between 320-330 on the intake. i would think those could put out some amazing numbers if someone like advanced induction got ahold of them and put them with some 1 7/8" longtubes and the right cam