When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
arozenstraten- I'm not sure that I need studs, but if I were boosted, I could see the logic in that approach! My compression is going to be just under 11:1 normally aspirated.
Orr89rocz- Which link? Better yet, which ARP part number are you using?
If your using lt1 block i would use the studs
The Lt1 have open holes and leak water.I also use the mr gasket A-2 sealent on the bolts to seal the water jacket threads on the stud or bolt
Last edited by REDC4CORVETTE; May 16, 2008 at 12:57 AM.
I have studs on a couple of cars and not on others. I much prefer regular bolts for two reasons. Some of the head bolts (or studs) tap into water passages. A few of the studs will leak coolant right up through the threads of the studs. After you do your re-torque, a few more will leak. And don't forget, some of the studs with possible leaks are under the valve covers.
Head bolts are much less problematic.
Secondly, if you ever have to take the heads off with the engine still in the car, it's 2x more difficult with studs.
My experience.
Last edited by 73, Dark Blue 454; May 15, 2008 at 11:45 PM.
First time I used studs I freaked, seeped for almost a week and eventually corroded themselves shut like the machinist said they would.
Thing is it wasnt my motor so I REALLY got an earful about how I f'd it up. Hey, he wanted studs, he got it.