Roller Rockers
I took this car to the track before the rocker arm install and the best time I ran was a 15.6
I went back to the track Yesterday and ran a 14.5 for a best time and a 14.7 for a worst time.
This is hands down proof that the rocker arm replacement is a big horse power gain.
I'd say on average, rollers do reduce internal friction and should make more Tq available at the crank. It's probably negligible, unless the roller rockers have a slightly increased ratio, and in that case the gains will depend on restrictions / configuration of intake / exh. ports, seat angles, and other factors. I was happified after I switched, FWIW.
Besides...roller rockers must have a different type of nut to hold them in place...with roller rockers...the adjusting nut...is bigger too...you gotta have bigger nuts with roller rockers...They are taller...that is where the clearance comes in your adjusting nuts will hit the baffles in your valve covers...you get the picture...
Besides...roller rockers must have a different type of nut to hold them in place...with roller rockers...the adjusting nut...is bigger too...you gotta have bigger nuts with roller rockers...They are taller...that is where the clearance comes in your adjusting nuts will hit the baffles in your valve covers...you get the picture...

And on the exhaust question...
Melrose makes a full off road system with an X pipe.
Seems to fit the early cars pretty well from the research I have done.
I was looking at this system myself but decided to go with hookers and hook up to my existing exhaust just to save money... alot of money.
I'd say on average, rollers do reduce internal friction and should make more Tq available at the crank. It's probably negligible, unless the roller rockers have a slightly increased ratio, and in that case the gains will depend on restrictions / configuration of intake / exh. ports, seat angles, and other factors. I was happified after I switched, FWIW.
My Cranes were on sale at Summit for $224 bucks.
I was told by about everyone on this site that I should get a 15 HP gain and they were on the money. You don't take half a second off of your quarter mile time without a nice HP gain.
As for the install, a very nice member off of here sent me step by step instructions on how to do it and it went real well with no problems.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Besides...roller rockers must have a different type of nut to hold them in place...with roller rockers...the adjusting nut...is bigger too...you gotta have bigger nuts with roller rockers...They are taller...that is where the clearance comes in your adjusting nuts will hit the baffles in your valve covers...you get the picture...
I also have an 86, mine with iron heads and just want someone to clarify that ill need the set for 3/8" studs right??
Has anyone ever heard of problems with staying with 3/8" rather than making the upgrade to 7/16"??
The reason i ask is because i plan to upgrade heads when its time to rebuild and i would rather not have to buy the same part over again in a different size. or do aftermarket heads typically have 7/16" studs?
First, they have press-in studs, so you can't just swap studs. The heads have to be removed, the the stock studs removed, then the stud holes in the heads tapped for screw in studs.
The only work-around I know if is to have the stock 3/8" studs pinned to help prevent the stock studs from pulling out - which they are known to do from time to time.
Of course, this calls for the removal of the heads too, so why pin them when it's just as easy to have the stud holes tapped? This would then allow you to move to 7/16" studs as a direct screw in swap.
Second, the pushrod slots in the heads will need to be elongated using a Louis Tool, to allow the needed clearance for the pushrods when moving to 1.6 rockers. Failing to do that will probably cause you to end up with a bunch of bent pushrods - Been There!
Sorry for the "bad" news. Hope this helps.
Jake
West Point ROCKS!












