When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am going to change out my factory TPI intake for one that I have ported out in a couple of weeks. While I have it off I thought about changing Camshafts. Will I gain much with a cam change? I do not have the factory motor in my 1990 c4 it has been changed to a ZZ4. If I do change cams what would be the best cam for my car? I have a 2800rpm stall, 307 rear end, etc.
Last edited by Crowhater; Feb 14, 2011 at 09:15 AM.
I do not know, the car had a ZZ4 motor in it when I bought the car so I guess it does.
Need to find out what cam you have at present.
Because the ZZ4 engine is such a good buy, cost wise ;
many buy one and then swap in a cam of their own choice
Also given that a ZZ4 looks identical to a '90 engine ; how do you know you actually have a ZZ4 installed
What numbers on block?
it's a close call to use 1.6 rockers on ZZ4 springs
your final lift will be .504 .540 you may have coil bind
they claim a max .550 lift that's pushing them especially if there older
Last edited by THE 383 admiral; Feb 14, 2011 at 09:09 PM.
Guy please explain? Do I need to change my springs to run the 1.6 rockers? If so what springs do I need and what seat pressure do I set them up at? My ZZ4 engine has about 30k miles on it.
you did not mention changing the engine... if you have a TPI setup no I would not
stroke to a 383.. the intake is all wrong unless you change to a mini or stealth ram
injectors and endless mods
Like rodj says, you need to find out what Cam you actually have and go from there. As for 1.6 Rockers with the ZZ4 Cam... Kevin McClelland; who helped develop the ZZ4, " The reason I don't like 1.6 Rockers on the ZZ4 Camshaft profile is because when GM designed that Camshaft, the acceleration rates and the opening and closing velocities were pushed to the max. With the additional acceleration of the 1.6 Rockers, the valve actions become unstable. The Valve will bounce on the seat on closing at high engine speed. There is also a lot of inherent noise with adding these rockers to the lobe, which was designed for 1.5 ratio Rocker." (Chevy High Performance May 2009)
Aside from that, you want to keep the Cam pretty small if you're running a TPI on the street. It just isn't going to pull much over 5K even ported, because of the Runner length.
Like rodj says, you need to find out what Cam you actually have and go from there. As for 1.6 Rockers with the ZZ4 Cam... Kevin McClelland; who helped develop the ZZ4, " The reason I don't like 1.6 Rockers on the ZZ4 Camshaft profile is because when GM designed that Camshaft, the acceleration rates and the opening and closing velocities were pushed to the max. With the additional acceleration of the 1.6 Rockers, the valve actions become unstable. The Valve will bounce on the seat on closing at high engine speed. There is also a lot of inherent noise with adding these rockers to the lobe, which was designed for 1.5 ratio Rocker." (Chevy High Performance May 2009)
Aside from that, you want to keep the Cam pretty small if you're running a TPI on the street. It just isn't going to pull much over 5K even ported, because of the Runner length.
Thanks guys I guess I will look at that gear change then.
Might want to reconsider that ;
3.07 is recommended best all round ratio for a TPI car.TPI cars have gone slower with lower gears because engine passes through the torque range too fast
Might want to reconsider that ;
3.07 is recommended best all round ratio for a TPI car.TPI cars have gone slower with lower gears because engine passes through the torque range too fast