C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Lope Separation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2011, 02:25 PM
  #1  
Marv02
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Marv02's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: California City Ca
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Lope Separation

I know I should be looking for a lobe separation of 112 to 114.

But can I get a 110 Separation to work with a good tune. (Lunati 60122)

SLP runners and Eldenbrok Hi flow base.

It will also be in a 383.

The RPM range is 2400 to 6200 What I was told the 383 will put the RPM range down lower so this might just miter work out for the 383 DD street motor.

What your 2 cents on this.
Old 06-03-2011, 03:51 PM
  #2  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,986
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

The short answer is yes. Lobe seperation means nothing with considering all the other aspects of the camshaft. It can be made to work fine.

FYI, That cam is pretty big for a long runner TPI style of system, it can work but may not be the best choice for your application.
Old 06-03-2011, 03:58 PM
  #3  
Marv02
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Marv02's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: California City Ca
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hum Ok I just to want to make sure I get the right cam this time around before other were saying I was using to small of a cxam with my set up and the 195 Heads.

And a 383 needs a bigger cam.

Originally Posted by bjankuski
The short answer is yes. Lobe seperation means nothing with considering all the other aspects of the camshaft. It can be made to work fine.

FYI, That cam is pretty big for a long runner TPI style of system, it can work but may not be the best choice for your application.
Old 06-03-2011, 04:16 PM
  #4  
rklessdriver
Safety Car
 
rklessdriver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Dale City VA
Posts: 3,592
Received 399 Likes on 262 Posts

Default

Honestly I think that Lunati is too big for a TPI.

You need to look at something about 10* smaller (advertised and @.050).

Honestly I think the GM hot cam or something along those lines would be a good choice for what your doing.
Will
Old 06-03-2011, 04:27 PM
  #5  
Marv02
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Marv02's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: California City Ca
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ok which Hot cam the one I looked at Thoough SCD the numbers were not inpressive the price was good.

Originally Posted by rklessdriver
Honestly I think that Lunati is too big for a TPI.

You need to look at something about 10* smaller (advertised and @.050).

Honestly I think the GM hot cam or something along those lines would be a good choice for what your doing.
Will
Old 06-03-2011, 05:54 PM
  #6  
rklessdriver
Safety Car
 
rklessdriver's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Dale City VA
Posts: 3,592
Received 399 Likes on 262 Posts

Default

P/N 24502586

Impressive numbers don't mean crap when it comes to a choked up TPI intake system.

Your engine won't make any power over 5500RPM - no matter what cam you stick in it.

All a bigger cam does is narrow the powerband from the bottom up. Since you can't do anything about the top end (without buying an entirely different intake manifold) why give up what could have on the bottom end?
Will
Old 06-03-2011, 06:02 PM
  #7  
powerpigz-51
Drifting
 
powerpigz-51's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Chewelah Wa
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I have a new XE256 cam on 110 lsa that I am going to put in my 85. I have tuning capability....but little knowledge. Sounds like a good cam to learn on.
Old 06-03-2011, 09:13 PM
  #8  
WW7
Le Mans Master
 
WW7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 8,731
Received 398 Likes on 318 Posts

Default

I have an Erson 218/ 226 / 112 LS in my 383 which is real close to the Hot cam. I have to agree with rklessdriver about this being a real good choice for the 383 motor when using a TPI intake, which I also have, Edelbrock base, Accel runners, ported plenum.....This was the cam Pete K suggested for my build after talking with the Erson tech. There's no sense having a cam for high rpms when the best your motor will do before its out of breath is 5500 rpms.....WW


Last edited by WW7; 06-03-2011 at 09:38 PM.
Old 06-04-2011, 03:57 AM
  #9  
Marv02
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Marv02's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: California City Ca
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Thanks everyone.

After looking at all the pros and cons I going to keep my Lunati 60101 cam I can't see forking out a extra $600.00+ to swap to a roller after all.

The OP range of my cam now seems to be the best from what I want it to do and has the number I like for a DD and still has a mean sound to it not a full race car sound.

With the intake and smog what I have seems to be the best combo for now at least untill they do away with smoging my Car out here in Cal.

I can buy a lot of zinc for oil change with the $600.00+ up front I be saving LOL.
Old 06-04-2011, 04:12 AM
  #10  
Marv02
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Marv02's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: California City Ca
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This is my cam and I going to use And power numbers.



Old 06-04-2011, 12:00 PM
  #11  
GREGGPENN
Race Director
 
GREGGPENN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Overland Park Kansas
Posts: 12,012
Received 394 Likes on 323 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Marv02
Hum Ok I just to want to make sure I get the right cam this time around before other were saying I was using to small of a cxam with my set up and the 195 Heads.

And a 383 needs a bigger cam.
Not all heads are equal. Some heads don't "need" as much cam to produce the output. Plus, there are other solid roller cams out there.
Old 06-05-2011, 05:13 PM
  #12  
powerpigz-51
Drifting
 
powerpigz-51's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Chewelah Wa
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I wanted that Voodoo for awhile......I researched it for a long time, and it has a rep as an excellent TPI cam. And yes, you can buy a lot of zinc for the cost of a retro roller setup. Almost cheaper to get a late model roller block with a cam already in it lol
Old 06-05-2011, 06:58 PM
  #13  
coupeguy2001
Le Mans Master
 
coupeguy2001's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 6,043
Received 144 Likes on 106 Posts
2021 C4 of the Year - Modified Finalist

Default

I went with the Crane cams TPI cam, P.N. 104224 in my 383.
With 1.6 roller rockers it is .482 in. and .495 ex.
above 1700 RPM, the aceleration takes your breath away.
on the mileage indicator, I get 19 avg, and 29-32 straight and level.
It has a slight lope to it and sounds "healthy".
On my 350 TPI, I went with the marine cam. It is the same cam Chevy uses on the ram jet 350 and the HT 383 truck engine.
THe 350 pulls hard right off idle and the 383 has to get some RPM. Both cams are full rollers.
I found the cam on Fleabay for $35 as a take out cam. It apparently never was in a running engine because the lobes didn't look like they had any roller marks, just the polished machine finish.
THe same guy sells all kinds of cams. I get the idea that he works for a dealer and they just discard the cams and he makes a little on the side.
Old 06-05-2011, 11:20 PM
  #14  
Marv02
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Marv02's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: California City Ca
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default This whats Up.

It cost me $200.00 for everything after returning my Lunati cam set up.

I end up getting a LT4 GM hot Cam, Used Spider set up, New CC timing chain and gears that I can use with my 2 PC timing cover OEM Hyd roller lifters, CC push rods.

I have read this will pass CA Smog with a good tune.

Last edited by Marv02; 06-06-2011 at 12:33 AM.

Get notified of new replies

To Lope Separation




Quick Reply: Lope Separation



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.