Yet another timing question
what year? how did you arrive at 9*, which is high for stock engines?
the ign module has some advance unless you have modified it.
possibly, the stock parmeters have no influence, but normally, too much static advance causes the engine to halt during crank, then spin free again, on and on. retarded spins but does not seem to fire.
I set my 91 with the est single tan'blk wire d/c, engine hot, auto trans in drive -which is to pull the rpm down, I guess, per the label on the rad shroud.
it is now at 7* but was at 0 for two years and ran "fine." more low end with 7*.
if I allow the engine to climb rpm, I see the ign module adding about another 6-8* advance. So, if I had retarded the base timing, I would actually be at 0 or 2 atdc. follow that?
your engine may be retarded. to find out, simply advance the housing CCW about .100", measured at the small diameter where the clamp is.
then starting it to see if it made a diff, if so, you may have proven that timing was retarded.
I would concentrate on keeping rpm low as possible so as not to interpret the module advance for base timing. check timing again, of course.
joe
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I'm beginning to wonder if it is even a spark advance issue. that engine should start with a lot of advance. if too much, it would tell you by kicking back. at least, the old big block high compression would.
I think the est connected has the "potential" to advance timing, but not sure if it does at start rpm's, and don't believe it does.
it appears the the engine is shut down by the est.
I am totally uninformed about chip changes and all. once again, I have waded into a discussion where I have no expertise.










