18 degree heads
For my fall project,,, I'm tossing around the idea of 434 w/18 degree heads, single plane plane intake with @ 80mm throttle body intake,
think there is a guy here with that same setup name escapes me (stevexxx?)
Pretty stout setup
Hes a regular sure he will post
Last edited by cv67; Jan 22, 2012 at 10:06 PM.
Less than 5 miles from me is an excellent Cylinder Head resource, so that part would be easy, and I would thoroughly enjoy welding up my own header tubes
Your engine @ 7K RPM's NEEDS 1,758 CFM. That would be about 280 CFM per cylinder.
A set of Brodix 23 deg. T1 M2's like I have flow 309 CFM's.
To convert to 18 deg. heads?
Custom Intake
Custom Headers
Both will cost you a BUNCH of money.
23 deg. intakes & headers?
LOTS of choices.
EASY decision...
Your engine @ 7K RPM's NEEDS 1,758 CFM. That would be about 280 CFM per cylinder.
A set of Brodix 23 deg. T1 M2's like I have flow 309 CFM's.
To convert to 18 deg. heads?
Custom Intake
Custom Headers
Both will cost you a BUNCH of money.
23 deg. intakes & headers?
LOTS of choices.
EASY decision...
Your engine @ 7K RPM's NEEDS 1,758 CFM. That would be about 280 CFM per cylinder.
A set of Brodix 23 deg. T1 M2's like I have flow 309 CFM's.
To convert to 18 deg. heads?
Custom Intake
Custom Headers
Both will cost you a BUNCH of money.
23 deg. intakes & headers?
LOTS of choices.
EASY decision...
Bending air on a 434 for an optimum performance is always a challenge, hence the SB2 / 18-degree heads. Also, my local shop M&M Competition Engines, @ 2 miles away makes SB2.2 exclusively
18 degree will make for HP than 23 degree on performance engines , that's a fact, fast cars are expensive, that a fact as well.
That's a fact...my engine builder has done half a dozen of them, and dynoed every one of them. Mine will be built to run E85, so the compression ratio will be in the 12.5:1 range to get the most out of the octane rating of the fuel.
My calculations were a bit off, and after looking at it closer I posted this in another thread...
A V8 engine gets a power stroke every 90 degrees: 720° ÷ 8 = 90°, which is four power stokes for each revolution of the crankshaft.
So in a single revolution, you have at least 4 cylinders filling with air simultaneously (but 90 deg. off of each other). 309 x 4 = 1,236 CFM
And I couldn't agree more about costs. It seems that you spend cubic dollars to get small gains sometimes...but you have to spend it.
It'll be interesting seeing the results of your project...


All of the work on my first 3 engines was done here before the owner Bob, sold it to guys that used to work at INDY Cylinder Head, which is a premier MOPAR performance shop. i.e. Top Fuel etc.
http://mmcompetitionengines.com/
Last edited by LD85; Jan 23, 2012 at 11:06 AM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I asked him for a ballpark power estimate and he said that he would "feel safe in saying @ 660-FWTQ and 675-FWHP range" , take it for what its worth

So, I'm stuffing the piggy bank and gonna put a freeze on gun purchases, my other hobby
and go out and sale Automation Equipment like I never have before! Today its a dream and I hope some tie after Thanksgiving, its a reality.
something like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cccYWADbHPw
would not be all that hard to do
and another in action
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpP20...eature=related
Last edited by racebum; Jan 23, 2012 at 06:41 PM.
I know what everyone is saying but I think there is more to this from my experiences. Comparing my motor to the LSX series I am down 30+ horsepower. Here are my stats.
1) 369cubes
2) 11.12:1 compression ratio
3) 280/280-233/233 camshaft on 113 LSA, .594" lift at valve.
4) AFR 210 heads modified by DR J., Flow 305cfm at .600" lift on his bench. Speed at the pushrod pinch is 315fps. 2.08/1.60 valves.
5.) Intake flows 336 cfm with maximum with max airspeed of 300fps at peak horsepower rpm of 6500rpm.
Everything is there and the best I can do is 420rwhp/417rwtq. If this was an LSX combination with the same exact specs I would be well past 450rwhp. IMHO I am thinking that the 18 degree and 15 degree heads utilize the available CFM better in creating horsepower. In other words it is much easier to make the power with the 18/15 degree heads than the 23 degree heads. I am still wrestling with this and found this thread quite interesting as I am looking into it myself.
The best engines I can recall reading about always seemed to have hi CR, and the ones that had crazy good numbers, well, I was always suspicious of those.
At this point, i.e. today, I don't see myself spending $12k but the engine in my car has probably only @ 10k miles on it, so I am in no rush, I'll read and study about this more, lots to consider, hood height and clearances etc.
The only custom part is the headers as far as I can see, everything else is off the shelf, although the heads are ported by a CNC , just as many others are. So off the shelf yes, and costly yes
yes!
I know what everyone is saying but I think there is more to this from my experiences. Comparing my motor to the LSX series I am down 30+ horsepower. Here are my stats.
1) 369cubes
2) 11.12:1 compression ratio
3) 280/280-233/233 camshaft on 113 LSA, .594" lift at valve.
4) AFR 210 heads modified by DR J., Flow 305cfm at .600" lift on his bench. Speed at the pushrod pinch is 315fps. 2.08/1.60 valves.
5.) Intake flows 336 cfm with maximum with max airspeed of 300fps at peak horsepower rpm of 6500rpm.
Everything is there and the best I can do is 420rwhp/417rwtq. If this was an LSX combination with the same exact specs I would be well past 450rwhp. IMHO I am thinking that the 18 degree and 15 degree heads utilize the available CFM better in creating horsepower. In other words it is much easier to make the power with the 18/15 degree heads than the 23 degree heads. I am still wrestling with this and found this thread quite interesting as I am looking into it myself.
I am not sure what your goals are but your combination could benifit from a cam with a tighter lobe seperation and more duration. It will idle rougher but it will hit harder and make more power if the cam was changed.
That's a fact...my engine builder has done half a dozen of them, and dynoed every one of them. Mine will be built to run E85, so the compression ratio will be in the 12.5:1 range to get the most out of the octane rating of the fuel.
:
A rule of thumb is (intake flow X .256 X 8 = HP potential of a high performance street car), (intake flow x .280 x 8 = HP potential of a competition built engine designed for racing with limited on no street use), (intake flow x .311 x 8 = HP potential of an all out drag race engine, no compromises)
HP street (309 x .256 x 8) = 633 HP
Competition (309 x .280 x 8) = 692 HP
All out, no compromises (309 x .311 x 8) = 769 HP
These are rules of thumb and should only be used as that.



















The 245's should work well and save some money.
