When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
In the speed density cars, (mine specifically is a '92) how does it know that the elevation changes while driving?
I understand (was taught in automotive school 20 years ago) that the MAP sensor takes a quick "snap shot" of manifold pressure (ambient air pressure) as the key rotates past "on" to "start" and gets it's Baro reading in that instant. I was further taught that any WOT event would cause the ECM to reset the BARO. Maybe.
But what happens when you cruise from 6000' elevation to 10000' elevation, at part throttle? There is no WAY that the MAP would ever see atmospheric pressure during that event, so how can it "know" that the air pressure has dropped? Or increase, when going down?
In the speed density cars, (mine specifically is a '92) how does it know that the elevation changes while driving?
I understand (was taught in automotive school 20 years ago) that the MAP sensor takes a quick "snap shot" of manifold pressure (ambient air pressure) as the key rotates past "on" to "start" and gets it's Baro reading in that instant. I was further taught that any WOT event would cause the ECM to reset the BARO. Maybe.
But what happens when you cruise from 6000' elevation to 10000' elevation, at part throttle? There is no WAY that the MAP would ever see atmospheric pressure during that event, so how can it "know" that the air pressure has dropped? Or increase, when going down?
Good question, I'm not sure that is would detect the elevation change in that instance. Unless, somehow it infers it from the 02 sensors? As it makes adjustments to keep it in stociometric with the less oxygen available.
Huh. Could be. I've been thinking about this since I moved. In my daily commute, I go from ~7000' to 9000' in about 6-7 minutes. Then back down to 7000' over about 15 minutes, then up to about 10,000' in about 20 minutes. Pretty quick and dramatic changes. Made me wonder, w/o a dedicated BARO sensor, or a MAF, how it could manage that.
Huh. Could be. I've been thinking about this since I moved. In my daily commute, I go from ~7000' to 9000' in about 6-7 minutes. Then back down to 7000' over about 15 minutes, then up to about 10,000' in about 20 minutes. Pretty quick and dramatic changes. Made me wonder, w/o a dedicated BARO sensor, or a MAF, how it could manage that.
Runs fine, no issues...just wondered.
Find a GM engineer I bet they know. Dave McLellan would be a good start.
The pressure in the plenum changes whenever you change the throttle opening or the engine speed changes. The ECM reads the pressure several times per second to adapt the fuel injector pulses to the changing conditions. The older ECMs took readings 10 times per second, so I'm sure the newer ones do it even more often.
But what happens when you cruise from 6000' elevation to 10000' elevation, at part throttle? There is no WAY that the MAP would ever see atmospheric pressure during that event, so how can it "know" that the air pressure has dropped? Or increase, when going down?
The computer does not care what the atmospheric air pressure is, all the engine cares about is what the pressure is in the intake manifold while the engine is running. The fuel and spark are adjusted based on the running MAP readings. At cruise your MAP readings are lower then atmospheric readings and the computer adjusts accordingly.
The computer does not care what the atmospheric air pressure is, all the engine cares about is what the pressure is in the intake manifold while the engine is running. The fuel and spark are adjusted based on the running MAP readings. At cruise your MAP readings are lower then atmospheric readings and the computer adjusts accordingly.
Seems logical to me, however, it then begs the question, why does it get a quick baro reading before start up?
Just a side note. There are two ways to measure pressure/vacuum.
One is "gauge" pressure. One side of the gauge is open to atmosphere and the pressure reading is the difference between what is being measured and atmospheric pressure. Vacuum gauges work this way.
The second is "absolute" pressure (as in Manifold ABSOLUTE Pressure). This method does not use a reference and is just pressure.
Just a side note. There are two ways to measure pressure/vacuum.
One is "gauge" pressure. One side of the gauge is open to atmosphere and the pressure reading is the difference between what is being measured and atmospheric pressure. Vacuum gauges work this way.
The second is "absolute" pressure (as in Manifold ABSOLUTE Pressure). This method does not use a reference and is just pressure.
I've measured vacuum at the manifold with a gauge and read it using a scan tool via MAP. Two different numbers. Kinda thru me off for a second, then I realized it.
I think it remembers the atmospheric pressure to compare to the current reading to get a difference. The computer is calculating volumetric efficiency to determine the air flow through the engine. From that it determines what the injector pulse width should be to get the correct air/fuel ratio.
I think it remembers the atmospheric pressure to compare to the current reading to get a difference. The computer is calculating volumetric efficiency to determine the air flow through the engine. From that it determines what the injector pulse width should be to get the correct air/fuel ratio.
SO...if that is the case, then back to the original question. If it's comparing to a "snap shot" taken and 6000', and you're pulling into work at 10,000'...that comparison is going to be erroneous.
I get that all that REALLY matters is the pressure inside the plenum -as long as it doesn't get so far out of whack w/the TPS to MAP to RPM ratio.
I was kind of under the impression that cars could measure the pressure two ways, one way is the way you described, the second way is to have two sensors. Do the speed density engines have two sensors?