When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
There was not O2 post cat on any OBD I Corvette, so you just have the two O2's..
The Chilton's manual I have, for the 94 LT1, shows 3 O2 sensors and I do not consider that a reliable source, but... where there possibly could have been a 3rd O2 sensor, I have a dangling connector with 4 wires????? What else could this connector go to???? I am not challenging... I just have questions!
I had the cruise set on 84 mph.
Interesting that at 84 mph you get your best mileage... with higher air drag. I would be willing to bet at 60, 65, or 70 you would not or do not get as good or better mileage - even with less air drag. I realize that corvettes have low air drag but still with increased speed comes more air drag.
I decided to look it up in OnDemand, and there is a 3rd O2 sensor listed there. I admit I was not expecting that.
I still doubt it not being there would cause any performance issues, or fuel economy issues.
Newer models of all cars have O2 sensors fore and aft the cat. IIRC the ones in the front determine the fuel/air ratio and the ones after the cat determine how well the cat is working... but do not quote me on that one.
I have heard of more than one case where someone changed the exhaust in one way or another (larger exhaust, shorty headers, etc., etc.) and had to get a re-tune due to changing the back pressure. The engine was tuned originally with a set amount of back pressure... change that and you will change the fuel/air mixture. Removal of the aft one in my case may not have an effect on the fuel/air ratio... but I am not sure on that one. Someone must have changed the programming because I am not getting an error code!?
Huh, I guess I was wrong. The LT1 has true dual exhaust; which pipe has the 3rd O2?
Neither, it is dangling loose. I am not sure my car came with dual exhaust... if it did then Chilton's would show 4 O2 sensors and I would have 2 dangling connectors. I think my car came with a single tube down the tunnel with a Y after the cats, the 3rd O2 sensor after this Y, single tube down tunnel, and a Y into 2 mufflers... but that is a SWAG.
IDK that I get my best mileage at 84 mph; that was just the speed I picked for that trip, b/ it was 9 over.
Sorry, but what is IDK? If your rear tires are the same as mine 285/40ZR17, then your tire diameter is 26 inches and at 84mph you would be turning 1957rpm in 6th gear (http://www.4lo.com/calc/gearratio.php). I am not trying to say "I told you so", but you are proving my point. At ~2000rpm this engine is more efficient that at lower rpm. At 84mph with increased air drag you get better mileage than at lower speeds! I think this is great!!!!!
I think my car came with a single tube down the tunnel with a Y after the cats, the 3rd O2 sensor after this Y, single tube down tunnel, and a Y into 2 mufflers... but that is a SWAG.
If your car is an LT1, it came with two cats and dual exhaust. That is why my comment on the oddity of having 3 O2's per "chevyowners" post. My '92 LT1 has 2 O2's; one before each cat.
Originally Posted by afgunn
Sorry, but what is IDK? If your rear tires are the same as mine 285/40ZR17, then your tire diameter is 26 inches and at 84mph you would be turning 1957rpm in 6th gear (http://www.4lo.com/calc/gearratio.php). I am not trying to say "I told you so", but you are proving my point. At ~2000rpm this engine is more efficient that at lower rpm. At 84mph with increased air drag you get better mileage than at lower speeds! I think this is great!!!!!
IDK = I Don't Know. Sorry about the acronym.
My data from that one trip "proves" nothing, except that you should be getting better mileage. I already stated clearly that "84 mph" isn't the magical, optimal speed; it just happened to be the speed that I chose on that particular trip...9 over the limit.
I've also gotten ~30 mpg traveling to and from work, when I lived in Telluride. All secondary roads, very mountainous, 30-60 mph speeds on that 44 mile commute. Now that was using all fuel saving techniques; driving brainlessly, I'd get ~25-27 on the same commute.
1994/95 LT1's have three o2 sensors, two pre-cat and one post-cat on the passenger's side.
Exactly what I had (hence the dangling connector), listed as such in Chilton's, and a previous post attested to this as well. If the car did come with dual exhaust, then why only 1 O2 sensor after one cat?! I sure do not know!? Thanks!
Nope. I have seen it on other vehicles using 2 cats. The cats are placed as close as possible to the exhaust manifolds (to catch as much heat as possible) with an O2 sensor in front of each, come into 1 pipe, and then the 3rd O2 sensor. Had a 2001 Pontiac Montana with this configuration.
Nope. I have seen it on other vehicles using 2 cats. The cats are placed as close as possible to the exhaust manifolds (to catch as much heat as possible) with an O2 sensor in front of each, come into 1 pipe, and then the 3rd O2 sensor. Had a 2001 Pontiac Montana with this configuration.
I was referring to LT1 OBD cars. I have now looked at the 94-95 Roadmaster, Caprice, Camaro, Firebird, and Corvette diagrams it is Corvette only for 3 O2s. In 1996 they all have 4 O2s.
It is common for OBD2 vehicles to have O2s after the cats, but not so much OBD1.
I was referring to LT1 OBD cars. I have now looked at the 94-95 Roadmaster, Caprice, Camaro, Firebird, and Corvette diagrams it is Corvette only for 3 O2s. In 1996 they all have 4 O2s.
It is common for OBD2 vehicles to have O2s after the cats, but not so much OBD1.
Interesting!? And baffling, esp. if we are talking about dual exhaust!
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
Originally Posted by afgunn
I have heard of more than one case where someone changed the exhaust in one way or another (larger exhaust, shorty headers, etc., etc.) and had to get a re-tune due to changing the back pressure. The engine was tuned originally with a set amount of back pressure... change that and you will change the fuel/air mixture. Removal of the aft one in my case may not have an effect on the fuel/air ratio... but I am not sure on that one. Someone must have changed the programming because I am not getting an error code!?
With the lower MPGs you are getting, I would wonder if the tuning was done correctly and if missing feedback is circumventing proper fuel trim.
Also, backpressure is a common "misnomer" often objected to when talking about exhaust systems. There isn't a change in backpressure so much as in increase/decrease in the "siphoning" effect of pulling exhaust out of the motor. (Small, insignificant detail that doesn't affect understanding of your point though...)
I am talking without my 94 Helms in front of me (and in fact as the 94 was sold over 15 years ago, my Helms may be long gone) but the 94 Y body was interesting. It had a 16 pin OBD2 ALDL connector but was OBD1. So I had to get an OBD2 to OBD1 gender changer to work on the computer. I can't remember how many sensors it had but I will go with 3. However I kinda remember that it was plumbed wired for 3 but the 3rd wasn't included as the PCM had no provision to use an after cat O2 sensor data.
I have an EE def file for TC so would be happy to read your bin (or LT1) file to see if it is stock if you can pull it and email to me. However I can't find any table in any of the 94 files I have that take input from a 3rd O2 sensor.
I have an EE def file for TC so would be happy to read your bin (or LT1) file to see if it is stock if you can pull it and email to me. However I can't find any table in any of the 94 files I have that take input from a 3rd O2 sensor.
Verrrry interesting... I was under my 94 today trying to secure the loose connector and noticed that behind the passenger cat was the piping for the 3rd O2 sensor. I could not see or feel if this 3rd O2 sensor was actually installed or wired. I will need to have it lifted up to determine for sure.
I currently do not have any way to pull the program from the PCM. I want to get this ability, but I do not have it at this time. Got suggestions?
In my experience the least expensive as well as the best (including after purchase support) is TunerCat by TC. Google will get you there.
You will need the 16 pin ALDL female connector and wire to your computers usb port. That is also available on the TunerCat website. Might as well get DataMaster also, which is your logging software. That is by TTS, but also avail through the website.
Also, if you have a bung welded into the exhaust manifold behind one of the cats you will see it as it would be capped by what appears to be a 7/8ths inch bolt. At least the 02 sensor is 7/8ths of an inch, so I expect the bung cap would be also.
Hopefully you don't have an open bung in the exhaust system. <g> Might get a bit of CO in the car when you are parked.
In my experience the least expensive as well as the best (including after purchase support) is TunerCat by TC. Google will get you there.
You will need the 16 pin ALDL female connector and wire to your computers usb port. That is also available on the TunerCat website. Might as well get DataMaster also, which is your logging software. That is by TTS, but also avail through the website.
I just completed ordering TunerCat with the DataMaster program. What is the advantage of DataMaster over TunerCat? Both seem to have the same functions.
Obviously, it will take me a few weeks to get that bin file, but I will and I will contact you at that time. Thanks much for that offer.