When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hello. I'm having a problem where while I am in open loop on a cold start, the car will idle about 18:1 when I come to a stop light. It will not return to it's usual AFR unless I restart it. However, if I continue to drive it will be fine when driving and when it returns to idle it will be lean again.
If I start the car and do not move at all, the idle will be fine all the way to closed loop.
Anyone know why this is happening?
It's annoying because I am getting some surging occasionally and it runs slightly rough.
Hello. I'm having a problem where while I am in open loop on a cold start, the car will idle about 18:1 when I come to a stop light. It will not return to it's usual AFR unless I restart it. However, if I continue to drive it will be fine when driving and when it returns to idle it will be lean again.
If I start the car and do not move at all, the idle will be fine all the way to closed loop.
Anyone know why this is happening?
It's annoying because I am getting some surging occasionally and it runs slightly rough.
1985 Corvette
Thank you.
Take a look at the two tables I attached, one adjusts the amount of extra fuel added in open look based on temperature only and the other adjusts it by load. Find out what your temperature and load are in the problem area and tweak those areas.
And on Tuner Pro RT, there is a thing called "Load Variable". This is what I assume I need to look a for this situation? Problem is, it's fixed at 59 no matter if the MAF, Engine Speed, Vehicle speed, or TPS changes. It's always at 59.
I'm using the ADX file from Tuner Pro's website if that matters.
I plugged my laptop in today. I watched the AFR gauge when it returned to idle. Mostly averaging 16-17 and sometimes spiking to 19:1 at a few times.
The MAF sensor never moved out of 11.xx gm/sec while idling the whole time.
This was all in open loop mode. BLM was fixed at 128 and INT was fixed at 128.
Here is the important part, Injector BPW was about 2.1 - 2.2.
When it switched to closed loop, the integrator started moving, and the BLM finally settled at 142.
This is where it gets strange, the Injector BPW now was at 1.9 and the AFR gauge was at 14.7:1. MAF was still in 11.xx gm/sec.
Why would injecting less fuel in the engine cause the AFR to richen up?
Your BLM added in 10% more fuel by the math but your pulse width went down, that does not make sense. The bottom line is more fuel was added by the BLM and the car ended up richer.
Your BLM added in 10% more fuel by the math but your pulse width went down, that does not make sense. The bottom line is more fuel was added by the BLM and the car ended up richer.
That's exactly why I'm confused. That's what was displayed on the computer screen. What do I make of it?
Also it seems as if the BLMs are higher when the engines is colder running in closed loop. I guess because the air entering is denser from less engine heat?
Also it seems as if the BLMs are higher when the engines is colder running in closed loop. I guess because the air entering is denser from less engine heat?
It could be that the fuel on a cold engine was not vaporizing as well so the engine requires more fuel to operate at a specific AFR since some of the fuel does not burn and goes out the exhaust. Once the gets into closed loop it is at least 120 degrees and the extra heat is causing the fuel to vaporize better so less fuel is required to run at stoic.
On my lean return to idle issue, could it be caused by having a very small exhaust leak at the collector gasket? Maybe there is a pressure change in the exhaust when it returns to idle causing it to suck in outside air? Is that possible?
On my lean return to idle issue, could it be caused by having a very small exhaust leak at the collector gasket? Maybe there is a pressure change in the exhaust when it returns to idle causing it to suck in outside air? Is that possible?