When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hello so my 1984 4 plus 3 has decided it wants a new cam shaft. I pulled the intake and hand rotated the engine. And one of the lifters in the number five cylinder refuses to go up and down. Like it should.
This is low budget. I did the heads last year, stock. So I am thinking of changing the cam, the water pump and timing chain. The car is NEVER going to rev above 4000/4500. And I am keeping the CFI. A friend suggested a chip. With that in mind any cams come into mind.
I think that the stock cam builds power above 1800, correct. I was thinking of an RV, I think that there is one that comes in closer to 1000. Suggestions please. And to Roll my rockers or not?
Thank you
This car is a street car. So I need it to have good manners i.e. smooth idle, vacuum for power brakes, decent gas mileage, no over heating.
Last edited by jseremba; Jun 24, 2015 at 10:25 AM.
Reason: clarification
Honestly, any cam that is similar to the stocker will work. The 84 will not need much tuning unless you really mix things up. If it was me, and on a budget, a stock replacement camshaft or even the venerable .390/.410 lift cam would be fine. With that some new lifters, pushrods, and stamped stewl 1.5 rocker arms and be done. You won't notice any loss in power and it will probably run better than it currently does.
Honestly, any cam that is similar to the stocker will work. The 84 will not need much tuning unless you really mix things up. If it was me, and on a budget, a stock replacement camshaft or even the venerable .390/.410 lift cam would be fine. With that some new lifters, pushrods, and stamped stewl 1.5 rocker arms and be done. You won't notice any loss in power and it will probably run better than it currently does.
The cam you suggest has lower lift than the stock cam. I would think that I would be loosing horsepower, god forbid. I am sure that even the original cam will improve the way it runs. This cam has probably be going for quite some time.
I am looking at cams with a lobe separation of 110 to 112. Should I go to 115. If so why. Thank you all
The cam you suggest has lower lift than the stock cam. I would think that I would be loosing horsepower, god forbid. I am sure that even the original cam will improve the way it runs. This cam has probably be going for quite some time.
I am looking at cams with a lobe separation of 110 to 112. Should I go to 115. If so why. Thank you all
a 112 - 113 separation is fine it will provide a smooth idle. you will need new Springs with your new cam. something in the range of a LT1 cam. The best upgrade would be converting to a retro roller cam lifter combo.
I wish that people would quit posting this "112 Lobe Separation = smooth idle" stuff....
It doesn't work like that and nothing could be further from the truth. A camshafts Lobe Separation Angle by itself means nothing and tells you nothing in regard to idle or power band characteristics.
There is just so much more to it. Generalities and focusing on the wrong things just do more harm than good.
OP - you best bet is to call a cam grinder and talk with them about what you want to do... with the advances in camshaft technology (a lot has happened since 1984) a modern "smaller cam" could very well make more power and have better driveability than your stock cam.
If you want to follow the bad advice listed here feel free to check out the "GM First or Second Design Off road cams" PN's 3927140 or 3965754.... both are on 112 LSA and slightly bigger than your stock CFI cam.
Will
The cam you suggest has lower lift than the stock cam. I would think that I would be loosing horsepower, god forbid. I am sure that even the original cam will improve the way it runs. This cam has probably be going for quite some time.
I am looking at cams with a lobe separation of 110 to 112. Should I go to 115. If so why. Thank you all
I know its lower, never said it wasn't. But you seem to want an economical way to fix it. Those cams are super cheap, as are lifters and rockers. My point about power was that combk I mentioned will improve power compared to what you have now with the bad cam.
I wish that people would quit posting this "112 Lobe Separation = smooth idle" stuff....
It doesn't work like that and nothing could be further from the truth. A camshafts Lobe Separation Angle by itself means nothing and tells you nothing in regard to idle or power band characteristics.
There is just so much more to it. Generalities and focusing on the wrong things just do more harm than good.
OP - you best bet is to call a cam grinder and talk with them about what you want to do... with the advances in camshaft technology (a lot has happened since 1984) a modern "smaller cam" could very well make more power and have better driveability than your stock cam.
If you want to follow the bad advice listed here feel free to check out the "GM First or Second Design Off road cams" PN's 3927140 or 3965754.... both are on 112 LSA and slightly bigger than your stock CFI cam.
Will
thank you for the lesson!!!
I did not just give a separation!!!! have a read, scroll down to lobe separation...