5.3 ls swap
an iron block lsx (especially one with less cubes) gains you NOTHING. especially if you are going to go boost - at that point the head /intake magic of the lsx series is simply overcome by an extra 2 psi boost
the alum block weight savings is where the real potential of the lsx lies
(On the money)
If you are pulling the motor, just get more cubes.
NOW! what is your goal? The car is limited every where else as the power grows.
600+hp gets deep in the pockets real fast unless just doing some dyno runs and hope it don't break.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I'm involved with a 75 stingray restoration where as we are installing a Lunati 383 LT1 fuel injected stroker engine. In this endeavor I have found that we will need a late C4 donor car to complete the project just to have all the proper brackets and such to make the conversion.
The path of least resistance and cost will be a C5-up donor vehicle.
This is good advice. A c5 z06 Corvette pullout is at least $3000, plus headers, cam swap, tune, and all the nickel and dime (and very time consuming) obstacles is a daunting and expensive task.
In the end, I ended up putting a 421 in my c4 (I already had it), and if 550 streetable hp isn't cutting it, I'll get a c5 z06. You can get then in the mid/high teens for a good starter car. I love my c4, but it will also be much more difficult if you ever want to sell it. People are all talk, but tough to pull the trigger on a car thats been hacked.
Last edited by cadmaniac; Sep 2, 2016 at 10:36 AM.
I think in this unique circumstance, given the fact it's an 84 and it's already had another non-vette engine installed, any conversion using later model corvette parts at this point would be more valuable than how it sits now.
If the body is clean, and you got the $$ and or skill, I'd say for OP to go for it. I wonder, is it a high mile car too?
If you're still running the crossfire, or carb then moving up to a ported electronic fuel injection system is defiantly going to yield some improvements in performance as well as reliability, but a carb is still going to be WAY LESS expensive and could net serious horsepower if your engine is set up correctly... But again, it's a carburetor.
Now if you're just looking to go fuel injection, and you're tired of the old carburetor then look at some of the built in improvements on the LS engine compared to the TPI L98 and LT1/LT4 -
1. They come with "quality" roller fulcrum shaft style bolt in rocker arms. Cost for roller rockers on an L98/LT engine $200-$400 depending, maybe $100 if you go ultra cheap.
2. They have Bee-Hive springs from the factory (good for larger cams). $1200-$2800 because lets be honest, if your going to spend money to have bee-hive springs installed on L98/LT heads you're going to spend at least a grand.
3. High speed digital ignition with individual coil. $1200-$5000 for an aftermarket digital ignition system.
So clearly you can see the value in a 5.3 LS, and a 6.0 LQ would just be that much sweeter, and yet even better an LS2 but where you going to find a trailblazer SS for cheap? Even if it is smashed and being sold for parts?!
Or you could build a pretty good 350 HP engine with a carb for about $2500 or less if you did it yourself. This is the "old-school" option, but it works.
Last edited by SELLC; Sep 2, 2016 at 09:07 PM.
Then add Typical hop ups like full exhast and cam and you are over 400hp.
so am i off base? The Iron/aluminium L98/TPI can compete with the iron block/alum head LS series (LQ).
an iron block lsx (especially one with less cubes) gains you NOTHING. especially if you are going to go boost - at that point the head /intake magic of the lsx series is simply overcome by an extra 2 psi boost
the alum block weight savings is where the real potential of the lsx lies
Then add Typical hop ups like full exhast and cam and you are over 400hp.
so am i off base? The Iron/aluminium L98/TPI can compete with the iron block/alum head LS series (LQ).
The big thing with the LS or later systems that utilize high speed computers and sensors in conjunction with the transmission and other vital systems is that it can compensate and adjust for different conditions much faster than anything the LT1's system can. The integration of high speed computer systems throughout every aspect of the drivetrain can simply adapt faster than anything we have seen before. The end results speak for themselves!
I still like the LT4, and it's relatively archaic to me, which is why it fascinates me like a kid with an old toy they used to dream of having. But I don't let that allow me to lose sight of the truth.
































