When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
But alas... I have purchased the pre made jumper and feel more comfortable using a plug and play piece rather than cobbling something together where milivolts are involved.
A plug-in harness extension is a cheap and easily reversible part to try. I've known several people who have not had good luck even with these, including the previous owner of my C4 (who also was a professional mechanic and modified cars for a living for many years). However, it has a better chance of working properly than cutting and soldering the pigtail of the sensor. And if it doesn't work, you're only out a few dollars and nothing is hurt. Please post back your results, because more data is better.
Sorry your thread got crapped on. We just seem to have an issue with one forum member going around to every thread that I and one other member post in for the sole purpose of making ad hominem attacks on us. For the purpose of drawing a line between real information and these attacks, I believe it's important that it be confronted when it happens. After that, everyone is free to make his/her own decisions based on the info provided.
I also think that the air entering the sensor has to be free flowing directly where the wires enter the top of the sensor..
Yes but look at the picture. Where is the soldering being done? At the start of the sensor you have a point. Between the connections and sensors, where is the issue?
Yes but look at the picture. Where is the soldering being done? At the start of the sensor you have a point. Between the connections and sensors, where is the issue?
The picture you posted literally shows what is being stated: the reference air is entering a passage from the black pigtail wire. Again, not every kind of O2 sensor gets its reference air this way, and some apparently don't need a reference at all. But ours do. Here's yet another reference, straight from the manufacturer:
Originally Posted by Bosch
The sensor receives the reference air through the connection cable. This means that the connector must be clean and dry. Contact spray, and anti-corrosion agents etc. are forbidden.
The connection cable must not be soldered. It must only be crimped, clamped, or secured by screws.
ETA: Anyone who wants more references on this can just google "oxygen sensor reference air solder." You'll get a long list of informative sources.
Last edited by MatthewMiller; Sep 9, 2018 at 03:18 PM.
The picture you posted literally shows what is being stated: the reference air is entering a passage from the black pigtail wire. Again, not every kind of O2 sensor gets its reference air this way, and some apparently don't need a reference at all. But ours do. Here's yet another reference, straight from the manufacturer:
ETA: Anyone who wants more references on this can just google "oxygen sensor reference air solder." You'll get a long list of informative sources.
What they term "cable connector" is not the wire. So what you are saying is that the air comes from the connection between the air intake harness, travels down the electrical wire and becomes the reference air for the O2 sensor? Diffusion isn't an instant thing in that case so how would the sensor get an accurate reading of what the reference air is at the connection between the harness and the sensor in a timely fashion? If you say that we cannot cut and solder where the connection is which, in this case is ON the sensor itself, I totally agree but if you say the ambient air travels down the sensor wire and becomes reference for the sensor, I do have my doubts.
What they term "cable connector" is not the wire. So what you are saying is that the air comes from the connection between the air intake harness, travels down the electrical wire and becomes the reference air for the O2 sensor? Diffusion isn't an instant thing in that case so how would the sensor get an accurate reading of what the reference air is at the connection between the harness and the sensor in a timely fashion? If you say that we cannot cut and solder where the connection is which, in this case is ON the sensor itself, I totally agree but if you say the ambient air travels down the sensor wire and becomes reference for the sensor, I do have my doubts.
That's exactly what I'm saying: the reference air travels down the sensor wire (between the conductor and the insulation sheath) to the inside of the sensor itself. Doubt it all you want, but please look at the references I have cited and reread Ed Ramberger's post. If you choose not to believe someone who worked in the industry plus a reference from a major sensor manufacturer plus a couple other references from industry sources...I'm not sure what else to tell you.
Last edited by MatthewMiller; Sep 10, 2018 at 12:35 AM.
That's exactly what I'm saying: the reference air travels down the sensor wire (between the conductor and the insulation sheath) to the inside of the sensor itself. Doubt it all you want, but please look at the references I have cited and reread Ed Ramberger's post. If you choose not to believe someone who worked in the industry plus a reference from a major sensor manufacturer plus a couple other references from industry sources...I'm not sure what else to tell you.
This is basically exactly right. Anyone disputing this just hasn't done any due diligence.
What they term "cable connector" is not the wire. So what you are saying is that the air comes from the connection between the air intake harness, travels down the electrical wire and becomes the reference air for the O2 sensor? Diffusion isn't an instant thing in that case so how would the sensor get an accurate reading of what the reference air is at the connection between the harness and the sensor in a timely fashion? If you say that we cannot cut and solder where the connection is which, in this case is ON the sensor itself, I totally agree but if you say the ambient air travels down the sensor wire and becomes reference for the sensor, I do have my doubts.
You doubt quite a lot of correct processes and procedures, even when a veritable avalanche of supporting facts have been presented to you. Its what you do in an effort to participate in conversation.
That's exactly what I'm saying: the reference air travels down the sensor wire (between the conductor and the insulation sheath) to the inside of the sensor itself. Doubt it all you want, but please look at the references I have cited and reread Ed Ramberger's post. If you choose not to believe someone who worked in the industry plus a reference from a major sensor manufacturer plus a couple other references from industry sources...I'm not sure what else to tell you.
Thing is, I have read those articles but also had some report that they soldered with no ill effects, hence the doubt. Wish I didn't have to destroy a new sensor to find out. I suppose to test that idea out, you can put grease at the terminal section of the wire and see if it reads differently when inserted into an idling engine? What would you suggest as a better controlled test? I suppose it is worth the price to find out.
What would you suggest as a better controlled test? I suppose it is worth the price to find out.
I have no suggestions, because it's never occurred to me to test to see if I could get away with something that so many references say not to do. Especially when there's no need, as plug-in extensions exist or can be made. The thing about running a test like this is that nobody has claimed that cutting and soldering will have a 100% failure rate. So one test where you get away with it won't prove anything. You'd need to solder a bunch of sensors to get a significant test outcome.