When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
These days, I think the biggest reason for going with coilovers is if you want a much stiffer spring rate than stock. Since VBP went out of business, the supply of stiff and adjustable aftermarket leaf springs disappeared. So now, coils are the only realistic option. Other than that or the reasons Tom mentioned, I don't see a major reason to go with coilovers.
I don't see coil overs in my future unless. I need none of those features tbh.
Originally Posted by MatthewMiller
I do think the Ridetch shocks (coilover or not) are a very good looking option for a C4. The Koni yellows are terrible by any means, but they are twin tube (old anot especially performance-oriented architecture) and the rear shocks half to be removed to adjust them (which is a giant PITA). .
I have Koni yellows on my Thirdgen and like them a lot. PO had them installed, and I noticed the car rode differently than any other Thirdgen I had been in. The best I can describe is the the jerk is less but the ride is firmer. The car recovers and stabilizes quicker than stock while reducing the harshness. Our perception are probably different because I am speaking to street use compared to factory components. You are talking full on performance as compared to other aftermarket options on a Y versus F platform. However, I would assume a similar experience if I went with them on my Corvette as compared to stock, but there are probably better options. So, with stock springs and not wanting to master the adjustment... what have you seen or used as a best non-adjustable option on a stock sprung stock mass car?
So, with stock springs and not wanting to master the adjustment... what have you seen or used as a best non-adjustable option on a stock sprung stock mass car?
I'm not Matt, but NON adjustable? Best *I* have seen is Bilstein.
I'm not Matt, but NON adjustable? Best *I* have seen is Bilstein.
I'd probably agree with that. They are high quality monotubes, and of course original equipment on C4s. they can even be custom valved. My experience with Bilsteins in general is that they tend to have higher compression rates than some other shocks like Koni. That tends to give them a harsher ride. I don't know why. However, I think the stock-valved ones are going to be a good match for a C4, and I can't think of a non-adjustable that's better.
My experience with Bilsteins in general is that they tend to have higher compression rates than some other shocks like Koni. That tends to give them a harsher ride. I don't know why.
I totally agree with this, except *I* would describe the ride as "more taut"....not more harsh. To me, Bilsteins feel like they have good quality damping. The Koni's while adjustable and can be "softer", are what I would call more harsh.
I totally agree with this, except *I* would describe the ride as "more taut"....not more harsh. To me, Bilsteins feel like they have good quality damping. The Koni's while adjustable and can be "softer", are what I would call more harsh.
I would describe my F-Body the exact opposite. More taut, less harsh than factory.
Maybe it is a difference between Y and F platforms.
I was talking about on any vehicle. I've used Bilsteins on 'Vettes, Silverado 1500's, 2500 diesel, 3S's, Mustang (Fox), Jeeps....in all cases that I have experienced, that shock has what I would call, "Very tightly controlled wheel and body movements". Tight control....but not harsh.
I would submit that your Koni was better than whatever stock junk came on 3rd gens (no offense; you know that I had them too), and would or could lead you to your conclusion. I'd submit that a Bilstein would have provided even more damped, tight control w/o being more harsh than the Koni. Wish you didn't live so far away; You could drive my Koni equipped '92. I don't think that the shocks are great.
Tom, I had the Ridetech shocks, Banski rear bars, polyurethane on my sway bars all with my stock Z51 fiberglass leaf springs. I was never fully satisfied with my ride or handling even after everything I did.
Having said that the Ridetech adjustable shocks made the biggest improvement with the stock leaf springs. But the car was still lacking (I could get decent handling with the shocks set to a very firm setting but the car was skittish and had a ride that crashed over every bump).
When I switched over to the complete Ridetech coilover setup it was a night and day difference. And I realize for the money it should be! But this setup really delivered, the cars ride is so much more compliant and handles flatter then ever before, I am running a shock setting that is closer to the softer side of the shocks range. My car feels much less skittish when cornering over bumps, and the car is also really planted at speed especially the rear end.
I remember reading that GM went with the fiberglass leaf spring because of weight, cost and the added sway bar effect.
I know sway bars take away some of the independence from side to side on an independent suspension. Adding a fiberglass leaf spring adds some more sway bar effect causing even less independence.
My thought is that the CoilOvers give back a bit more independence to the suspension versus the leaf springs.
This was basically the input I was looking for. I dont see a comparable package to the Ridetech coilovers. Even Vansteel's offering isnt as complete. I assumed that removing the leaf spring would offer more independent wheel control and ultimately allow for a softer setup to offer better results.
I'm a Fox Body Mustang owner for the past 20 years and I ultimately had to go Coilovers to get the ride/performance I was looking for. I dont ever adjust the shocks so I'm running custom valved Bilstein Sports on that application that i'm very happy with but there was an option for that. If Ridetech offers their single adjustment shocks, that would be way more than I need to get the end result i'm looking for
I would submit that your Koni was better than whatever stock junk came on 3rd gens (no offense; you know that I had them too), and would or could lead you to your conclusion.
No offense. I don't think GM built Thirdgens with the best parts in the world. It is a Camaro, not a Ferrari and I am not a believer in stock is best. Still love them though.
Originally Posted by Tom400CFI
I'd submit that a Bilstein would have provided even more damped, tight control w/o being more harsh than the Koni. Wish you didn't live so far away; You could drive my Koni equipped '92. I don't think that the shocks are great.
Possibly, I am happier with the ride than any other Thirdgen I have had. That doesn't mean I have experienced all options. There could still be better. I can only tell you I am happy and how I would describe the ride.
Well, I installed SuperPro bushings and fresh-er FX3 shocks on my car and after driving it around for a couple weeks I am impressed with how things tightened up with the Bushing upgrade but the shocks and springs still leave alot to be desired.
Im curious how the RideTech system would be compromised by using the SuperPro bushings in conjunction with their coilovers and sway bars. Not sure I want to go through the hassle of pressing in new bushings into my control arms again LOL
Well, I installed SuperPro bushings and fresh-er FX3 shocks on my car and after driving it around for a couple weeks I am impressed with how things tightened up with the Bushing upgrade but the shocks and springs still leave alot to be desired.
Im curious how the RideTech system would be compromised by using the SuperPro bushings in conjunction with their coilovers and sway bars. Not sure I want to go through the hassle of pressing in new bushings into my control arms again LOL
I don't think the bushings would compromise the function of Ridetech coilovers and sway bars.
Bringing this thread back from the dead as I have purchased the Ridetech Coilover/sway bar kit and will start tearing the car apart tomorrow to install.
For those who have experience installing this setup. Should I start with the coilovers at zero pre-load? or is there a coilover length (or spring length) I should be aiming for right "out of the box"?
Bringing this thread back from the dead as I have purchased the Ridetech Coilover/sway bar kit and will start tearing the car apart tomorrow to install.
For those who have experience installing this setup. Should I start with the coilovers at zero pre-load? or is there a coilover length (or spring length) I should be aiming for right "out of the box"?
Any other pointers would be appreciated.
When I installed my RideTech coil over setup I started with zero preload. It is a good start.
Check your ride height stock at each corner before tearing your suspension apart. I took a piece of paper and drew a picture and marked it Front left, Front right, Rear left, and Rear right. I took a tape measure on a fairly level floor and measured from the middle of each wheel opening lip to the ground and wrote the values down on the paper.
I ended up lowering my car from stock close to an inch all around for a better stance.
And also I adjusted the coil overs to try and achieve equal height for each corner.
The only issue I remember having when installing the RideTech kit was with the sway bar Delrin bushings. You may find the bushing ends up being mounted on the bend instead of the flat part of the sway bar. I took a picture and sent it to customer service and Ride Tech told me that it was okay. it must be because I have never had any issues after several years.
Enjoy the kit and the new found ride and handling!!