Cam options?
Couple things that you may or may not have thought of. Your stock compression ratio with the stock heads (58cc chambers) is reported as 9.5:1, but I don't know how close that is to actual. I believe your year model L98 used the 4 valve relief dish pistons? If so, seems like GM had two different pistons back then, maybe one at 11cc and another at 13cc? I did a quick search and it looks like some say they had 0.049-0.051" head gaskets and others say theirs used a 0.028 shim gasket. If I were you, if you haven't already, I'd do the research to confirm what pistons and which gaskets your engine should have. If using the same head gasket (total compressed displacement) and you can't go thinner, going from a 58cc to 64cc head would drop 9.5 to fractionally under, but lets say 9.0:1. That doesn't equate to a lot of power difference, but you don't want to give away any either.
Depending on what you find, you might want to see if you can get flow numbers from TPiS for their CNC porting and see if the $1250 they charge for porting your L98 would be a good investment. I'm pretty sure at one time they were publishing around 270cfm, which is a good bit better than the 195 Enforcers.
https://tpis.com/products/tpis-cnc-p...39690120134818
Couple things that you may or may not have thought of. Your stock compression ratio with the stock heads (58cc chambers) is reported as 9.5:1, but I don't know how close that is to actual. I believe your year model L98 used the 4 valve relief dish pistons? If so, seems like GM had two different pistons back then, maybe one at 11cc and another at 13cc? I did a quick search and it looks like some say they had 0.049-0.051" head gaskets and others say theirs used a 0.028 shim gasket. If I were you, if you haven't already, I'd do the research to confirm what pistons and which gaskets your engine should have. If using the same head gasket (total compressed displacement) and you can't go thinner, going from a 58cc to 64cc head would drop 9.5 to fractionally under, but lets say 9.0:1. That doesn't equate to a lot of power difference, but you don't want to give away any either.
Depending on what you find, you might want to see if you can get flow numbers from TPiS for their CNC porting and see if the $1250 they charge for porting your L98 would be a good investment. I'm pretty sure at one time they were publishing around 270cfm, which is a good bit better than the 195 Enforcers.
https://tpis.com/products/tpis-cnc-p...39690120134818
edit: did some more looking and according to some online calculators my current is like 9.48 compression which is close enough to 9.5, and after the heads it would plummet to 8.9 even with the thinner head gaskets. But the amount of material it says I’d need to remove to get the 9.5 back is 0.025” or going to 10:1 I can remove 0.043” which seem doable but I don’t know enough to say if I should go up in compression. My concern is getting higher flow heads, bigger valves, bigger cam, then adding more compression on top while not having any tuning experience will add too many variables for me to mess up. Might be worth it though, I don’t want to put the cart before the horse though, I don’t know if there’s a machine shop nearby
Last edited by Apedwards99; Feb 14, 2022 at 09:24 AM.
I’m not a proponent of cutting heads much if any - especially if it’s not something I already have laying around. That’s why I was suggesting looking into the TPiS option. Not that much more and if they are still using the program that used to make 270cfm, they’ll be more responsive and make more power then the Enforcers.
edit: thought about it more and figured why not just call AFR and see if they do it, they do on eliminator but not on enforcer which is fine. But they also mentioned that when they mill it they also correct the geometry for milling so everything still lines up which I hadn’t even thought about before (which is rather amateurish) but if I save the extra money long term is seems like having them do that is best overall, might even be able to gain compression too which means even more bang for the buck
Last edited by Apedwards99; Feb 14, 2022 at 11:09 AM.







