Ls3 Build Lightweight Upgrades This Time




I'm actually doing a similiar thing on a Old GMC motor home. It's fun and scratches the OCD itch. Gutted it and I'm re-doing everythng for lower weight in the house now. I already did alu calipers, intake, heads and A/C compressor and headers for the mechanical side and dropped about 500 LBS which did make a noticable dfferance. I am somewhat self amused with my own efforts in using aluminum 3/8-16 bolts for the intake manifold on a 12k LBS motor home. Every pound counts.





A very interesting build you have there....
I really like how you demonstrate to everyone how a well designed light weight car is better than a heavy one with more power.
Reminds me of the Hellcat vs Corvette races. Chrysler never learned anything in their development of the Challenger. It was a heavy pig back in the day when my brother brought home his 426 Hemi Challenger back in 1970 with 58% of the weight over the front wheels, and it still is to this day. When my brother took his Challenger to the strip he promptly got "tuned-up" by modified Chevy Novas and Ford 351 Cleveland Mustangs that were way lighter.
For additional weight savings have you considered replacing the heavy cast iron brake rotors with carbon-ceramic discs?
There would be an easy 10+ pound weight advantage to be gained there, and it would all be un-sprung weight making it that much sweeter.
By my calculations the following would represent your total weight savings:
(4x10 lbs per corner for brakes) + (4x10 lbs per corner out of your wallet) = At least 80 lbs!

Best of luck with your build.
I am curious how low you can go on the total car's weight.
Best regards,
Mr. Bear




I am also using this as an opportunity to install the poly bushings I have had sitting on a shelf for ever.
Since lighter rotors may not be an option based on your lack of response to my previous post, I thought I would offer another suggestion that is more budget friendly since you are already at this stage in your build.
Obviously you have a VERY lightweight car so you likely don't need massive diameter solid sway bars which can be very heavy. I would like to propose running hollow sway bars in case this opportunity has been accidentally overlooked. Your bars do not appear to be very large however a photo without measurements does not always tell the whole story. My apologies if you have provided the measurements in a previous post that I missed, but I thought I would throw this out there just in case it was an overlooked opportunity to save some additional weight while offering a possible performance upgrade by switching from a small diameter solid set of bars to a larger set of hollow bars.

Best regards,
Mr. Bear

Since lighter rotors may not be an option based on your lack of response to my previous post, I thought I would offer another suggestion that is more budget friendly since you are already at this stage in your build.
Obviously you have a VERY lightweight car so you likely don't need massive diameter solid sway bars which can be very heavy. I would like to propose running hollow sway bars in case this opportunity has been accidentally overlooked. Your bars do not appear to be very large however a photo without measurements does not always tell the whole story. My apologies if you have provided the measurements in a previous post that I missed, but I thought I would throw this out there just in case it was an overlooked opportunity to save some additional weight while offering a possible performance upgrade by switching from a small diameter solid set of bars to a larger set of hollow bars.

Best regards,
Mr. Bear

I decided to switch to a tilton 5.5 in triple disk clutch and button flywheel with reverse mount starter and clutch mounted starter ring. this new set up saves 30lbs of roatational weight over my fidanza aluminum flywheel and act clutch. That is crazy weight savings.
I also just got a qa1 carbon fiber driveshaft. it weighs 5.6 lbs. That thing is light.
And wilwood two piece rear rotors. which save about 2lbs per side.


The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The harness bar mounting in the hatch was pointed out to me by R&D many years back. I was baffled but it's true that where you have it is just fiberglass and it will tear out easy. What I did was to cut a rectangle out down to the frame steel for the rear fasteners.
The header on the pass side it wouldn't bother me to notch the frame and patch. Which ever is easier I guess. At least with solid mounts the engine won't be shifting that way (I've seen 3/8" movement there).
Without a parking brake the rear knuckle can be trimmed, minor but it's neater.
I posted a lot of weights in a sticky thread: https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-and-info.html
The harness bar mounting in the hatch was pointed out to me by R&D many years back. I was baffled but it's true that where you have it is just fiberglass and it will tear out easy. What I did was to cut a rectangle out down to the frame steel for the rear fasteners.
The header on the pass side it wouldn't bother me to notch the frame and patch. Which ever is easier I guess. At least with solid mounts the engine won't be shifting that way (I've seen 3/8" movement there).
First order of significance is tires, wheels, and brake rotors/hats/hardware (unsprung rotating weight). 275's are a lot lighter than 315's and can be more effective on a 2500lb car in some cases. Also there's a 3-5 lb difference between some of the competitive brands, Hoosiers are real light if you're going slicks or race tires. Wheels, the three piece racing wheels with spun barrels are very light, and also the weight is closer to the hub compared to forged wheels. Cast wheels are sometimes very heavy. I use the open Ti lugnuts also, some people use the aluminum ones. The Porshce 951 I have had magnesium lug nuts (currently aluminum). All of those need anti seize. On the suberbikes, it was common to have gun drilled titanium hardware, very strong, very light, trick stuff, especially on the radial caliper bolts. The rear brakes on the earlier cars using the drum for the parking brake are pretty heavy, so I removed it same as the OP, and used same offset aluminum hats.
Second order of significance is unsprung weight... especially on the outboard side of suspension components, shocks, springs, arms, links, calipers, hardware. On the Corvette I've used chromoly tube bolts from Colemans Racing for all suspension links, except lower A-Arm inboard bolts.
Third order of significance is weight towards the front of the car, especially higher up, can be aluminum heads first and block second, light weight headlights, alternator, light weight carbon hood, exhaust... don't have the carbon hood myself, but it is a big bang for the dollar even at $2K. Battery (LiPO or LiFe), un-needed accessories, AC, blower motor, heater core.
Fourth are weight over the middle and rear and weight at the extremities at the rear - Polar moment of inertia. For the front this is much more significant as it reduces the reaction time of the front turn in, and sits in the previous category. For the rear it's mixed. I've driven a high PMI car and they are magic for controllability, and adding more weight to the rear tire. My Corvette handles better full of gas than 1/4 tank, better rear grip. Dragracers also like to have the weight higher, but for turning it's a compromise, I would shoot for a balanced set up first and then traction during accelerating. The Tesla is a pig but all the weight is very very low, so AX turning performance is outstanding. I add lead ballast to the rear on the corvette. Interior, sound deadening, carpet, seats, are pretty good for this, although I thought that the standard seat in the 1986 was actually very light.
Hardware is fun to change, but it's not significant for the $ especially in the third and fourth categories.
I also treat all of the titanium hardware mostly for aesthetics, using my "secret" process for dark color. They can be bought that way with DLC coating which is even better. I've used a lot of aluminum alloy hardware in the past for low load areas especially, haven't done that much on the corvette, except for all the ground wire connections on the heads and block. Once again, both aluminum and Ti hardware need anti seize or it will micro weld and gall pretty easy. Not fun. Titaniun Exhaust I assemble slip fit with high temp red RTV so that it can be assembled easier as it slips and slides, and disassembled later.
First order of significance is tires, wheels, and brake rotors/hats/hardware (unsprung rotating weight). 275's are a lot lighter than 315's and can be more effective on a 2500lb car in some cases. Also there's a 3-5 lb difference between some of the competitive brands, Hoosiers are real light if you're going slicks or race tires. Wheels, the three piece racing wheels with spun barrels are very light, and also the weight is closer to the hub compared to forged wheels. Cast wheels are sometimes very heavy. I use the open Ti lugnuts also, some people use the aluminum ones. The Porshce 951 I have had magnesium lug nuts (currently aluminum). All of those need anti seize. On the suberbikes, it was common to have gun drilled titanium hardware, very strong, very light, trick stuff, especially on the radial caliper bolts. The rear brakes on the earlier cars using the drum for the parking brake are pretty heavy, so I removed it same as the OP, and used same offset aluminum hats.
Second order of significance is unsprung weight... especially on the outboard side of suspension components, shocks, springs, arms, links, calipers, hardware. On the Corvette I've used chromoly tube bolts from Colemans Racing for all suspension links, except lower A-Arm inboard bolts.
Third order of significance is weight towards the front of the car, especially higher up, can be aluminum heads first and block second, light weight headlights, alternator, light weight carbon hood, exhaust... don't have the carbon hood myself, but it is a big bang for the dollar even at $2K. Battery (LiPO or LiFe), un-needed accessories, AC, blower motor, heater core.
Fourth are weight over the middle and rear and weight at the extremities at the rear - Polar moment of inertia. For the front this is much more significant as it reduces the reaction time of the front turn in, and sits in the previous category. For the rear it's mixed. I've driven a high PMI car and they are magic for controllability, and adding more weight to the rear tire. My Corvette handles better full of gas than 1/4 tank, better rear grip. Dragracers also like to have the weight higher, but for turning it's a compromise, I would shoot for a balanced set up first and then traction during accelerating. The Tesla is a pig but all the weight is very very low, so AX turning performance is outstanding. I add lead ballast to the rear on the corvette. Interior, sound deadening, carpet, seats, are pretty good for this, although I thought that the standard seat in the 1986 was actually very light.
Hardware is fun to change, but it's not significant for the $ especially in the third and fourth categories.
I also treat all of the titanium hardware mostly for aesthetics, using my "secret" process for dark color. They can be bought that way with DLC coating which is even better. I've used a lot of aluminum alloy hardware in the past for low load areas especially, haven't done that much on the corvette, except for all the ground wire connections on the heads and block. Once again, both aluminum and Ti hardware need anti seize or it will micro weld and gall pretty easy. Not fun. Titaniun Exhaust I assemble slip fit with high temp red RTV so that it can be assembled easier as it slips and slides, and disassembled later.
I know my wheel setup is on the list. Currently running TSW setup and they are pretty light. Thinking about going to 18s all around.
any sources on 3 inch slip fit titanium tubing?
Here's a source for raw stock:
https://store.tmstitanium.com/produc...P-Grade-1/161g
The thin wall stainless stuff is pretty light and 25% of the cost, and I can make a 304 stainless exhaust system that saves over 30lbs from stock. I mentioned Titanium exhaust because a lot of people get them stuck together, and another example of needing an anti-seize strategy... I've had a lot of titanium exhaust systems in the past, and it has draw backs. Especially joining Ti pieces to 304 Stainless using slip fit and springs to attach. I didn't notice you using any anti-seize, but then this post is more for others to see discussion than it is to instruct you of course.
Here's a source for raw stock:
https://store.tmstitanium.com/produc...P-Grade-1/161g
The thin wall stainless stuff is pretty light and 25% of the cost, and I can make a 304 stainless exhaust system that saves over 30lbs from stock. I mentioned Titanium exhaust because a lot of people get them stuck together, and another example of needing an anti-seize strategy... I've had a lot of titanium exhaust systems in the past, and it has draw backs. Especially joining Ti pieces to 304 Stainless using slip fit and springs to attach. I didn't notice you using any anti-seize, but then this post is more for others to see discussion than it is to instruct you of course.
My staring point was ~3200 with full fuel and heavy ZF trans, no AC, and lightweight wheels brakes shocks, and no rear sway bar… 1986.
My staring point was ~3200 with full fuel and heavy ZF trans, no AC, and lightweight wheels brakes shocks, and no rear sway bar… 1986.










