PCV / Crankcase Ventilation discussion... your thoughts?

I have an '85 L98 vette, and oily residue getting into the throttle body has always been a problem. Any excess blowby the pcv can't handle will go up the pcv supply line, backing up into the throttle body, and making the passenger side valve cover oily.
The PCV system has to be a closed loop to prevent unmetered gas from entering the system. It's sealed to prevent blowby to escape and pollute.
Now what I'm thinking.. is why not just vent excess pressure to the atmosphere, put a check valve on that side, to prevent the pcv from sucking unmetered air in through it. And... just have the pcv suck from the crankcase.
Is it ok to suck solely from the crankcase? Will this pull in too much oil, or create TOO much crankcase vacuum? I thought crankcase vacuum was always a good thing, something carbed cars with breathers don't have, which is why they burn up more oil.
Here's an explanation of exactly how the PCV system works on TPI vettes if you're not familiar:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The drivers side pcv line goes behind the throttle blades, (the vacuum side)
The passenger side pcv vent tube connects ahead of the throttle blades, (the atmospheric pressure side)
So.... flow will go from the passenger side port on the TB, down through the valve cover, head, crankcase, and up through the other side, through the pcv valve and into the plenum.
That is why you can't use one breather on these cars. If you did, the vaccum would just suck a bunch of air from the passenger side breather through the pcv valve on the drivers side... essentially a vacuum leak. (Un-metered air.)
The only time blowby goes UP the passenger side pcv vent line ahead of the TB blades, is under high load condtions. (Low rpm + high throttle = lugging)
This results in lots of cylinder pressure, lots of blowby, and not enough vacuum to pull all the blowby out. Soo.. it goes up the passenger side tube. I think it was designed this way on purpose... so that no blowby gasses could escape from the engine and pollute the atmosphere. Instead... they pollute the whole intake with nasty gooey slime.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

bad. So, the PCV is not there to help seal, give pressure or performance. The PCV is there to put the crankcase vapors back down the intake to burn. I capped off the fittings on the TB and manifold so there is no more nasty oil going into my intake.
I just went back and looked at your profile and see that you are too young to remember the pre EPA days :lol:
[Modified by LaVidaLoca, 10:14 PM 9/25/2003]
"By producing high crankcase vacuum, horsepower is increased by improving ring seal and preventing blow-by, intake-charge contamination and detonation"
From this site... http://www.aerospacecomponents.com/vacp.htm
Toyota took PCV design to a higher level see here... http://www.autoshop101.com/forms/h63.pdf
This site has a valve cover breather with a one way valve that eliminates the vacuum leak / behind the MAF. Only vents outward, allows no air to be drawn in, would work well on our cars. http://www.petersonfluidsys.com/vacsys.html
-Jim

One Way Valve - Pop Off
Breather assembly is installed on engine's crankcase in vacuum condition. Valve seals engine from air entering engine, but opens in the event of crankcase pressure, allowing crankcase to vent. Comes complete with -12 AN bung, to weld to aluminum valve cover, and filter.
My only concern is that with this check valve on there, will the PCV pull too much vacuum and suck even more oil into the intake?
Maybe this is tjwong's problem. Maybe his problem is a clogged pcv vent line on the passenger side.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
TJ could have a plugged vent line, but states his ventilation system / side is working...
I'll post some pics of my system w/ separators this evening.
[Modified by superlund, 7:25 AM 9/26/2003]
First pic shows the oil separator on the driver’s side, simple air tool type filter from Lowe's, just routed the lines from the intake vacuum & PCV ports as required. Blue line is from PCV valve & white line is to Vacuum port. Notice it has a small amount of oil trapped at present.
Second pic shows the oil separator on the pass side, same type filter. You can see how I routed the line from the valve cover, by following the yellow line. The filter is directly in front of the HVAC blower motor.
Third pic is another shot of the pass side & shows the filter in better detail & you can follow the yellow line on to the T-body inlet.
-Jim
[Modified by superlund, 10:28 AM 9/28/2003]

I installed PCV valves on the hoses in both valve covers. I don't know what other effects that has had, but it has stopped the oil burning.
Am I screwing something up by doing this?
The website that is selling high vacuum crankcase pumps does have some valid racing points. A high vacuum on the crankcase will allow less resistance when the pistons come down because of the less dense gases. The part abou t sealing the rings better, could only be attributed to preventing ring float. but this would only be at high vacuume. I didn't read how much vaccume this racing pump can pull on the crankcase, but a typical engine will not have a high vaccume on the crankcase. You might be due for a rebuild. I'm going through it right now my self.
At the same time crankcase pressure is being increased due to a piston moving down the bore, another piston is moving up its bore an equal amount.
So it would seem that the pressure would reamin roughly equal and there would not be a significant amount of crankcase pressure due to piston movement and it mus be coming from loose rings.
I really thought that high vacuum crankcase racing pump was interesting, but they didn't note any volume or pressure specs on the site. I wonder if there are any test results on these pumps.

[Modified by JUAN J SANCHEZ, 2:25 AM 9/30/2003]
[Modified by JUAN J SANCHEZ, 2:26 AM 9/30/2003]








