When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I checked your math and it is fine but I do not believe you added your N2O HP correctly to the engine HP at 3000 RPM. A 250 HP N2O kit is not going to produce 250 extra HP at 3000 RPM, it will produce the 250 HP at the engines N/A HP peak RPM point. If the the N/A hp peak occurs at 6000 RPM the N2O HP peak will also occur around 6000 RPM. The HP addition at 3000 RPM will be approximately 1/2 of the peak HP gain of 250 or approximately 125 HP.
If I use your estimate of 200 HP at 3000 RPM and then add 125 for a total of 325 HP at 3000 RPM I would end up with a torque number or 569 FT/LBS.
If I use your estimate of 200 HP at 3000 RPM and then add 125 for a total of 325 HP at 3000 RPM I would end up with a torque number or 569 FT/LBS.
I hate to say it but that isn't the way nitrous works. You are adding a given amount of fuel and nitrous into the engine so no matter what the same additional work over time will be had no matter what rpm your engine is running at.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the formula is
HP= (TQxRPM)/5252
exactly, but you can rearrange the formula using basic algebra to be
mn vette:
Your formula looks basically correct but I think you need to double check your unit manipulation. The formula if I can remember correctly, (my engineering reference book is at work); Power(Watts) = Torque(Radius) X [cross] Force (newtons) multiplied by Angular velocity (radians/sec). Again if I can remember correctly this formula is only valid for measurements taken using the metric system, this is where that correction factor of 5252 probably comes from but my only concern is since you don't have a unit label associated with it you don't know if it can be simply divided out as you have done. I will try to do a little more research later tonight and double check your figures.
Your math looks good to me; I think your estimate may indeed be a little low on HP as my 350 L98 builds 180 CHP at 3,000rpm.
The only issue I see is how that 250-shot varries across the RPM band. We can expect pumping losses to vary with RPM due to exhaust restriction, among other factors (is a 250-shot constant across the RPM band...then torque must fall off...).