Procharged stock LT-4?
Don't suppose you'll have much trouble with the Stealth. :nonod:
I've heard dyno's of ~420RWHP. Basically just as much as the LT-1 guys. Problem is boost needs to be lower because of the .5 more of compression.
Personally, I would stay away from all other kits and build your own using either Vortech or ATI head units.
LT4. Mine is set up to run max 6psi, but I'm running slightly less compression than you.
With my unit, Procharger claimed around 100hp at the rear wheels. My car increased from 262hp to 365hp RWHP. So, that was about right. You are not going to obtain 425hp at the rear wheels if you have an otherwise stock LT1. At least, not with the unit I purchased 3 years ago.
Now, with a LT4 you may reach close to the 400hp range at the rear wheels. But, it would probably require some fine tuning or additional engine performance work to produce 425hp or better at the rear wheels.
Procharger units are intercooled, which is why I chose them. And, they use their own self contained oil, which needs to be changed every 5-6K miles.
If you have any questions, or would like to see photos of my unit, email me at csulli@prodigy.net.
CS
why not drop the compression to about 9 and run 12 psi of intercooled boost and see what it will do.
love the blower cars, but I don't think putting them on the stock engines is the right approach unless you just want a very ez 100-150 HP, guess I'm just greedy.
fyi, my NA 390 LPE LT5 pulled 518 rwhp SAE. no blower, no nitrous, just lots of revs & noise!!
cya :D
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Somehow supercharging LT1 or LT4 seems very expensive. The end product if it works seems great, but why some many $$$$$.....
It is expensive, but you guys have to understand something, for every dollar spent boosting a stock motor, it will come back 3 fold in HP gains when you can finally rebuild the motor right, keep the blower, and up the boost. That is my plan.
Currently I've spent about $6000 on my blower setup for a measly 100-150HP. That may sound ourtrageous, HOWEVER, 80% of the parts I bought will be used to support my future 800HP requirements. I still say the most economical way to do it is build the low compression motor first, and then add the blower, but either way it's not like you're pissing your money away.
The knowledge gained from the install, running, tuning, learning about the necessary mods and parts for my eventual 800-1000HP engine was absolutely necessary, otherwise without the blower I would've had no clue.
Here's my personal recommendation:
If you plan on buying a blower kit for a stock motor and that's it! Final! No more mods! It's not worth the money. just spend $1000 on N2O and be done with it.
If you want to learn about forced induction and expand your HP needs, get a blower+built 383 with more HP than all the N/A guys make....and oh, did I mention how streetable a boosted 800HP engine is? ;)
I believe their HP claimes, however, I wouldn't spin a stock motor that high without a top end valve train upgrade.
if I had a P600, he would have known better.
Supercharging these cars is fine but the weak link is the weak pistons (hypereutectic) that are very suspect to breaking under detenation with high relative compression (stock compression plus compressed blower charge). That is why most all of the kits are such low psi on stock motors and why intercooling is so important (to keep heat down which can lead to detenation.
Mustangs are great for supercharging because of their much lower compression ratios and relative lack of hp gain when doing heads/cam setups compared to our cars (even though their pistons are made of the same stuff).
With an LT4 having 10.8:1 stock compression and hyper pistons you simply cannot safely put on much boost . Supercharged cars are truly awesome when setup correctly (aka 03+ Cobras) BUT downright unreliable when not setup correctly.
As a general rule of thumb, that may be so, but any modifications will be unreliable. Don't blame the supercharger because the driver doesn't have enough sense to tune it.
I think we've all seen that dollar for dollar a stock engine w/ s/c is not as cost effective.....but there's more potential in the future. That is the trade off.
I used to own a 97 Cobra and my recommendation there is go straight to a blower kit . Why? stock compression is only 9.8:1 and the 4 valve heads flow really well stock. Plus , although bolt ons work well , heads and cam changes are very expensive and more limited than on our more simple pushrod motors.
IMHO the real way to go if you want a blower is with a positive displacement type as well. Centrificals have their advantages (great packaging pricing and excellent top end power) but positive displacement types (like roots or twin screw ) produce massive boost at low rpms as well as at high rpms yeilding much more powe under the curve.
Nitrous is cheap and effective , but isnt always on and is REALLY hard on a motor.
:flag



















