When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a small split in BLMs while driving.. maybe 10 counts or so MAX.. in some fuel cells then are the same (126-128) and in others the side that was usually leaner goes richer and vice versa.. is this normal operation?
I have a small split in BLMs while driving.. maybe 10 counts or so MAX.. in some fuel cells then are the same (126-128) and in others the side that was usually leaner goes richer and vice versa.. is this normal operation?
Once you're off idle, split block learns that large are unusual and tyically indicate an exhaust leak. Having said that...you have to make sure you look at the overall datalog via something like an Excel pivot table. If you're looking record by record, there's a lag time as each data point is recorded. As a result, two "side by side" data points may reflect two different operating conditions that can result from something as mondane as slight throttle modulation during cruise.
good tip... I'll check it out tonight and post results.. :thumbs:
*edit* This is some info I took yesturday.. This might help with the diagnostic.. maybe not..
I took my laser heat detector to the engine today at work to see how shes doin’ The end exhaust posts of cyl #1, #7 and #8 were about the same at 430-480* at idle.. the center (shared) exhaust ports of #2,#3,#4,#5 were similar at about 510-530*.. the only odd ball was cyl #2 at a measly 400-420*
Next I checked the temps of the valve cover bolts figuring that the heat for the adjacent rocker arms would be transferred by way of induction and or raditation and they all came out in the 180* range.. except #2 was only 150* and #8 was 210*
What does this tell me.. probably not a whole lot.. But I’m going to put the valve cover and check the valve adjustment for #2 as well as inspect the plug and wire.. do you have any thoughts on this reasoning?
Re: split BLMs while driving - normal? (ANTI VENOM)
96GS, could you explain the lag time that you were talkin about? I found it interesting, I'm not sure I understood it fully though.
The PCM spits out data at a given rate and a scan tool or scan software records the data. All the various pieces of data aren't created at the exact same time, they're not dumped onto the data line at the same time, nor do they arrive within the log file at the same time. Because of this, recorded data points that occured at the "same time" by people standards are usually .04 to .06 seconds apart in reality. Just enough time for one data point to be reflecting condition "x" and the next data point to be reflective of condition "y" if some sort of transition occured (i.e. minor throttle modulation, etc). By logging lots of data (I usually log 30 minutes at a time, so many thousands of data points), you effectively eliminate the impact of data occuring during transition points.
In simpler terms, when I look at my AutoTap or OBD-2 log files, each data record has a time stamp. These time stamps show the delta in time between the data points. It's not unusual when recording a WOT run for instance for the two fuel trims to be different during the first and last records of the run and be identical everywhere else...all because of the time lag and transition.
i have scientifically proven i change the fuel trims by relocating the O2 sensor at a different "clock" position on my car. 12 o'clock ends up with roughly +10% fuel trims, versus 9 o'clock needing about +3%, no changes in programming or anything else.
i have scientifically proven i change the fuel trims by relocating the O2 sensor at a different "clock" position on my car. 12 o'clock ends up with roughly +10% fuel trims, versus 9 o'clock needing about +3%, no changes in programming or anything else.
just something i was playing with once...
-michael
Did you use additional sealing washers or simply stop tightening at different positions? If it was the later, air will be drawn past the sensor threads causing a false lean and adding fuel.
i have different bungs welded into the collector. one for the stock sensor, one for use with a wideband. i tried moving the stock sensor into the other bung and found the above to be true.
so when i say "clock," i mean the sensor on top pointing downward versus on the side pointing outward.
i have different bungs welded into the collector. one for the stock sensor, one for use with a wideband. i tried moving the stock sensor into the other bung and found the above to be true.
so when i say "clock," i mean the sensor on top pointing downward versus on the side pointing outward.
-michael
Interesting indeed. Perhaps it has to do with carbon build up on the upstream side of the sensor?