When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I got a quick scan with wideband hooked up and OL commanded (set water temp activation to 240* in table). I didn't know that the AFR error was not set up, so I have ARF readings but not error. In both the histogram and graph, it is showing around 13-1 at idle and when I run it up to around 1800 it goes down to around 11-1
I have the AFR commanded 14.7 in that range
The VE table is already around 1/2 what other tables are, and it is still pig rich
Any ideas??
I got a quick scan with wideband hooked up and OL commanded (set water temp activation to 240* in table). I didn't know that the AFR error was not set up, so I have ARF readings but not error. In both the histogram and graph, it is showing around 13-1 at idle and when I run it up to around 1800 it goes down to around 11-1
I have the AFR commanded 14.7 in that range
The VE table is already around 1/2 what other tables are, and it is still pig rich
Any ideas??
When I get home I'll boot up my laptop and look at your scan and bin file.
I glanced at the scan real quick. You need to add commanded afr to the table in order to log afr error. Seems odd to me that your stft's are 1-2% when idling at rich afr/s (11-12) then when holding rpm at 1500 stft's go up to 10ish% when the afr is actually way closer to what it should be commanding. Is your wideband setup correctly/does the display on WB read same as in the scanner?
Also is that a cold start ? may be good to add engine coolant temperature to primary table as well.
Is this supposed to be a speed density only tune ? (the maf is still enabled if so)
Going thru the tune a little more in depth shows a few things that need to be changed, fuel transient parameters need to be altered with this size injector as well. A lot of times this will cause a rich condition that wont change regardless of changes made to the tune. Bring it to Concord NC and I will do a street to for ya or dyno tune if you'd like
Haven't had a chance to look at the last two scans. Shoaf may be correct about the transient tables. I still suspect proportional tables are the problem. We need a faster way to communicate. Hit n miss over PM's is gonna take forever.