NEW ATI setup?
You should not try to mislead anyone either. . .the stock kit is good for 450-500rwhp. Any more than this and you will be pushing stock interals beyond their capabilities. Also, if you take a poll, I suspect you will find many people, like myself, who have had a positive experience with ATI? You start the other thread (poll) and I will participate.
IMHO, the real downside to the ATI kit is the intercoolers DO NOT cool as quickly as Andy's SIC. As a result, in spirited runs the temps will climb quickly and timing will be pulled. . .resulting in lost power. Oh, one other thing, laying down the radiator and using the stock fans makes Andy's kit 100% better (the ATI single fan is one of the worst things EVER), again, IMHO.
I am not trying to mislead new members. In my previous post, I even wrote, "I can say, without a doubt, I will purchase all of my future Vette mods from him (Andy). His setup, especially the reconfigured tubing, single intercooler and the ability to maintain the stock fan is perfect. As for ease of install, I will have to wait and see what the Vettemaster decides".
Additionally, I did have a problem with the idler pulley seizing up (which was also indicated in my previous post). To this point you are correct. ATI rushed their original setup to market and they should have been aware of the idler pulley problems. Then instead of fixing the problem by utilizing a larger idler, they simply changed the bearings (which also locked up on many people). This much is true, the R&D by Andy and other forum vendors should always be appreciated and supported.
Now, back to the question at hand, anyone have pics of the ATI setup? If no, please post. I personally would like to see the good, bad and ugly. Otherwise, I will see about getting pics this weekend.

VR
Hijack every thread? The original question was
"I was told it was very nice, something about "two tensioners"? I really have no idea what the mechanic was talking about, but I wanted to see what you thought?"
The question was left open to opinions regarding the setup. There has been excellent commentary here.
But did'nt you say you could post some pics in the second post. What are you waiting for? You could put this thread to bed.
By the way, you're the one who is selling his car or worse yet, parting out the latest and greatest from ATI. So why are you cheering on the ATI factory kit when it obviously was not all you thought it would be?
850hp???
850hp???

Hijack every thread? The original question was
"I was told it was very nice, something about "two tensioners"? I really have no idea what the mechanic was talking about, but I wanted to see what you thought?"
The question was left open to opinions regarding the setup. There has been excellent commentary here.
But did'nt you say you could post some pics in the second post. What are you waiting for? You could put this thread to bed.
By the way, you're the one who is selling his car or worse yet, parting out the latest and greatest from ATI. So why are you cheering on the ATI factory kit when it obviously was not all you thought it would be?
850hp???

The basic message I saw in this thread was.
"hey anybody seen or heard about..."
"yes, I have it and it is supporting 850+ RWHP on my car... I'll post some pics when I get a chance if anyone is interested"
" yawn, f... ATI they suck, who cares, A&A and ECS are the only way to go, yada yada yada"
Check your egos at the door fellas and you might learn something. Not always, but sometimes. I learned this a long time ago.
if you post any more malicious and false crap to try to undermine my car sale, or if you try to do anything else to prevent me from selling my car, then we can take it up with the moderators here.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Your ad does say though, You want to buy the old lady a Benz and I'll quote "reasons for selling: a) wife wants new house and Benz, and b) too many damn speeding tickets since the SC install. Last I checked, they are not cheap.
But getting back to my original comment, Post some objective photos or this will contiune to be based on opinions. Some qualified and some not. Personally, I'd like to know more, but so far, nothing and that includes your contribution.
Finally, your BMOC attitude may work at home but not here.
and "Jerk" fits when it's warranted, thanks.
and "Jerk" fits when it's warranted, thanks.


now for my 2 cents.. (and I will kick anyones booty that disagrees with me)
The ATI kit is a POS and no matter who I purchased new parts from to fix it (GWP/A&A) it only got better.
I only have one thing on my car that came from the ATI kit.. and that is the S/C housing... EVERYTHING else has been changed out.
That was not an inexpensive thing to do considering I was buying what was supposed to be a well thought out kit from a reputable business. Guess I learned my lesson huh!! Where in the hell is the "I told you so guy" when I need him most?? (OOPS!!)
That guy is me...
Here is to all of us living a little smarter from others (and our own) mistakes.
VR
I’ll avoid a big confrontation and just say that your perception is very far from the truth. I don't remember stating how much I like the ATI kit or how great it is. I only stated that the engineers at ATI are most likely not complete idiots and it is worth looking at what they came up with. I also stated that it can’t be all that bad if there is a car making over 800RWHP with it.
I did make some pretty smart a*s comments about the group think narrow minded attitude that is sometimes prominent here, but I only did that after people started hijacking the thread with their own agenda. Just read this thread from beginning to end (relaxed with a beer in hand) and I think you will see what I see.
I also stated that I thought that the A&A and ECS were great vendors with great kits. I just don’t like people constantly brining up their own agenda in unrelated threads. It makes the form misleading and full of
. And just to be clear, so nobody misunderstands my point. I would never suggest that anyone buy the ATI stock kit (in its old form) over the A&A/ECS kit. I just think that it would be nice to see what improvements they have made. We all benefit from innovation and holding a grudge torch in hand never gets you anywhere.
Oh well, this thread has went in the toilet, time to move on.
Last edited by QuickSilver2002; Aug 20, 2004 at 07:31 PM.
F ATI.
and besides, do you think the 800 rwhp owner just dynoed the car and never drove it??? his car has spent lots of time on the street AND the strip too.
Last edited by tattooed; Aug 21, 2004 at 03:50 PM.
funny thing is that there are probably more local c5s running around KC with the stock ATI kit than there are total ATI head units on forum member c5 cars here. and i bet less than 5% of the local c5s here have had problems.
i bet 90% of the california cars with ATI problems were due to the kit being installed by places like MMS back in the day. and using the crappy supertune that came with the early kits. i think we can all at least agree that the supertune crap in the P1 kits sucked.
Last edited by tattooed; Aug 20, 2004 at 09:35 PM.
Shinobi'sZ,
In your previous post you wrote, "As far as polls are concerned, the information has been well documented over the last 3 years. . .you would see the multidude of people who had problems..you were even a part of some of those threads and you were usually a single voice. Nothing against you personally but that is why you were the single voice. The fact of the matter is very few people probably even by the kit from ATI anymore because they sucked. Other forum tuners have made it what it should have been and that is why they have booked scheduled work. There was never a problem with the head unit...and if siezed idler pullies were the only problem this discussion would have never taken place the 100s of times it has on the forum".
I am not sure about the validity of your study? I suspect there may be some problems with your methodology; thus the findings, hereto stated, may be less than totally reliable.
I reject your primary argument, "The fact of the matter is very few people probably even by the kit from ATI anymore because they sucked". I suspect you do not have access to legitimate data to make such a claim? If your only source for data, regarding all ATI customers, is posted on this forum, then I think your research method is probably not so reliable? Before you come back with an insignificant argument, such as, "I was one of the first. . .", or "I read all Corvette, F-body. . .car forums", or "I am God, here me speak. . .", please save it for another thread.
If you have pics of the new ATI setup, please post them; otherwise, start another thread because I would like to see the new ATI setup. Why? I am interested in seeing it. That's it! To make sure we are clear, in case it was not clear in my original post, I now have A&A's setup and I could not be happier. It's the setup I will recommend to everyone. . .I am still interested in seeing the new setup from ATI.
funny thing is that there are probably more local c5s running around KC with the stock ATI kit than there are total ATI head units on forum member c5 cars here. and i bet less than 5% of the local c5s here have had problems.
i bet 90% of the california cars with ATI problems were due to the kit being installed by places like MMS back in the day. and using the crappy supertune that came with the early kits. i think we can all at least agree that the supertune crap in the P1 kits sucked.
Your leaving out the 38lb injectors too and the bracket issues as well. I













