Does this really work?





Hint: http://home.earthlink.net/~mmc1919/venturi.html
This is a cool animated demonstration where you can adjust the shape of the pipe (velocity stack in your case) by moving the yellow 'handles.'
Make the pipe look like the Vararam stack with the purple ***** (fluid/air) moving from left or left to right and notice what happens to the blue velocity curve under the animation. **** There's your answer!
Here's another kind of interesting link that might explain some real world observable phenomena because of the Bernoulli Principal: http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/mod_tech/node68.html Start reading the text found half way down the page.
I never believe the 'numbers' quoted in ads because they aren't sourced or rarely is a reference point given.
Did they run their test on 800HP engine and get a 13HP increase (1.625% increase)? If so, then a 1.625% increase in a 350HP engine would only equate to 5.7 HP? Hmmmm, big difference huh.
Are they quoting RWHP or crank HP?

Is the figure quoted at 5000 RPMs only or across the whole curve? Observing your experiment in the 1st link above should answer that one for you.
The ads that say 10% HP increase for example, whether true or not, at least give you some reference point. But when they say "a 7 to 10 HP gain" are meaningless unless they describe their testbed.
With all that said, the principal of the tapered carb stack is based on Bernoulli's findings, which haven't been proven wrong in the past few centurys.
So, are you going to buy one? (BTW, its on my wishlist).
..rickko..
Hint 2: Air behaves like a fluid
While we are on the topic of fluid (air) in motion, this is a very cool sight where you can have some fun. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/foil2b.html
Last edited by rickko; Jun 21, 2005 at 01:33 AM.






The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts









First, you're smoothing out the airflow path, instead of griding and filling with JB weld like some articles show.
Second, the "stack" is acting like a venturi and should be increasing velocity.
I'd like to see some real world tests on it, i'm pretty neutral right now, even if it was benificial i can't see it making much difference.
-Rich
First, you're smoothing out the airflow path, instead of griding and filling with JB weld like some articles show.
Second, the "stack" is acting like a venturi and should be increasing velocity.
I'd like to see some real world tests on it, i'm pretty neutral right now, even if it was benificial i can't see it making much difference.
-Rich
Are you talking about it squeezing the air and shooting it out the otherside into the intake manifold.
Is smoother air that is restricted better then less restictive and rougher air......bottom line is the most air possible right?? so which flows higher??
. Lets get real here. Gas, a$$, and grass, no one rides for free or close to it. Hint: http://home.earthlink.net/~mmc1919/venturi.html
This is a cool animated demonstration where you can adjust the shape of the pipe (velocity stack in your case) by moving the yellow 'handles.'
Make the pipe look like the Vararam stack with the purple ***** (fluid/air) moving from left or left to right and notice what happens to the blue velocity curve under the animation. **** There's your answer!
Here's another kind of interesting link that might explain some real world observable phenomena because of the Bernoulli Principal: http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/mod_tech/node68.html Start reading the text found half way down the page.
I never believe the 'numbers' quoted in ads because they aren't sourced or rarely is a reference point given.
Did they run their test on 800HP engine and get a 13HP increase (1.625% increase)? If so, then a 1.625% increase in a 350HP engine would only equate to 5.7 HP? Hmmmm, big difference huh.
Are they quoting RWHP or crank HP?

Is the figure quoted at 5000 RPMs only or across the whole curve? Observing your experiment in the 1st link above should answer that one for you.
The ads that say 10% HP increase for example, whether true or not, at least give you some reference point. But when they say "a 7 to 10 HP gain" are meaningless unless they describe their testbed.
With all that said, the principal of the tapered carb stack is based on Bernoulli's findings, which haven't been proven wrong in the past few centurys.
So, are you going to buy one? (BTW, its on my wishlist).
..rickko..
Hint 2: Air behaves like a fluid
While we are on the topic of fluid (air) in motion, this is a very cool sight where you can have some fun. http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/foil2b.html
I bought one, because in theory it should help, and I didn't want to do the more in-depth TB porting job. I run 8.24@87.19mph in the 1/8th with only intake and exhaust mods. No drivetrain or anything else other than tuning. A4 trans.
The flow rate does not change...i.e. the amout of air molecules that go from outside the intake to the engine does not change. The same amount of air goes in one end as comes out the other. Sure the velocity increases, but the flow rate will not. Like putting your thumb over the hose...sure water forces out stronger but it takes just as long to fill a bucket.
How does the physical velocity (m/sec not moles/sec) of the air into the TB affect HP?














