When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm mulling over the benefit of adding the slick looking catch can accessory. I'm wondering when installed on a well tuned 2000 w/ 50K miles, never uses any oil and probably never sees the other side of 4,000 RPM is there really any benefit other than asthetics when the hood is (seldom) opened? Will I ever see any oil in the can?
Last edited by Vettman 1; Dec 7, 2006 at 09:01 PM.
There's much more than meets the eye when it comes to catch cans. Even though I have plenty of experience with compressed air oil, air, and particle "traps" I felt that some automotive-related research was necessary. I expect to be able to post a full report, soon. But in the meantime.......
Most catch cans consist of an aluminum can, possibly some stainless steel wool, and a couple of tube fittings. The idea is that oil that escapes past the piston rings and is normally dumped into the intake manifold, can be "trapped". The presumption of many can vendors is that most of the oil is in bulk (liquid) form. If this were true, then a can would be all you need. Stainless steel helps trap a small amount of oil aerosols but the majority of the airborn stuff flows freely to the intake, undeterred by the coarse wire mesh.
Companies that specialize in air treatment and who have been making filters for decades use a much more effective material to trap the aerosols. It is called borosilicate glass fiber, its density being determined by the flow of air past it. Because our engines flow air through the PCV at slow rates (compared to, say, that of a large air compressor), the ideal "oil trap" is physically very small. Herein lies the problem. From what I've observed, our PCV line can transport 1/3 oz or more of oil every 500 miles. Exactly how much depends on the tightness of the piston rings and how agreesive we drive.
Since a true coalescing filter (with borosilicate fibers) that is designed for low-flow, low pressure, has a liquid oil trap that canhold only one oz of oil, I made a longer version. The filter cost me $43 and the aluminum to make the extended can, a mere $6. Even if I had a bunch of these made by someone else, my total outlay would be less than $80 AND I would have a better "trap" than what is currently available.
So, is a catch worthwhile? That depends on its cost, in my book. Most will catch some of the oil, so they are not worthless, but........
Thanks for the input! I think I'll buy "frame rails" I want to buy my car something for Christmas! My car is a daily driver, so they may be more useful!
I'm mulling over the benefit of adding the slick looking catch can accessory. I'm wondering when installed on a well tuned 2000 w/ 50K miles, never uses any oil and probably never sees the other side of 4,000 RPM is there really any benefit other than asthetics when the hood is (seldom) opened? Will I ever see any oil in the can?
Oil vapors are still getting into the intake manifold. It must be nasty inside.
you never go past 4k rpm? what are you waiting for?
Thanks for the input! I think I'll buy "frame rails" I want to buy my car something for Christmas! My car is a daily driver, so they may be more useful!
Regardless of your opinion on a catch can, the Frame Rails and Wheels are a great "mod". One of the best non show or go mods i've done.
There's much more than meets the eye when it comes to catch cans. Even though I have plenty of experience with compressed air oil, air, and particle "traps" I felt that some automotive-related research was necessary. I expect to be able to post a full report, soon. But in the meantime.......
Most catch cans consist of an aluminum can, possibly some stainless steel wool, and a couple of tube fittings. The idea is that oil that escapes past the piston rings and is normally dumped into the intake manifold, can be "trapped". The presumption of many can vendors is that most of the oil is in bulk (liquid) form. If this were true, then a can would be all you need. Stainless steel helps trap a small amount of oil aerosols but the majority of the airborn stuff flows freely to the intake, undeterred by the coarse wire mesh.
Companies that specialize in air treatment and who have been making filters for decades use a much more effective material to trap the aerosols. It is called borosilicate glass fiber, its density being determined by the flow of air past it. Because our engines flow air through the PCV at slow rates (compared to, say, that of a large air compressor), the ideal "oil trap" is physically very small. Herein lies the problem. From what I've observed, our PCV line can transport 1/3 oz or more of oil every 500 miles. Exactly how much depends on the tightness of the piston rings and how agreesive we drive.
Since a true coalescing filter (with borosilicate fibers) that is designed for low-flow, low pressure, has a liquid oil trap that canhold only one oz of oil, I made a longer version. The filter cost me $43 and the aluminum to make the extended can, a mere $6. Even if I had a bunch of these made by someone else, my total outlay would be less than $80 AND I would have a better "trap" than what is currently available.
So, is a catch worthwhile? That depends on its cost, in my book. Most will catch some of the oil, so they are not worthless, but........
Would replacing the steel wool found in most catch cans with borosilcate fibers help? How about some more info on your DIY catch can?
My 04 burned no oil. Yet the EE catch can did catch a minor amount of oil. Now after my o4 blew it's crank it's on the brand new crate engine from GM. After breaking in engine for 1000 miles once again there is a very small amount of oil in the catch can.
I highly recommend spending a small fortune on the CATCH CAN. Trust me, take the throttle body off and run your finger in there and you will find that there is more oil in the intake than you think. I constituted sending the $140 I paid to save me much more than that in the long run.
Would replacing the steel wool found in most catch cans with borosilcate fibers help? How about some more info on your DIY catch can?
If it were done properly - yes, I believe so. As I mentioned, the density of these fibers is specified for the flow range of air that is to pass through it. The lower the density, the higher the flow, but if you lower the density and subject it to low-flow air, many oil aerosols will pass by the "trap" and end up in your intake. This is why I chose a low-flow coalescing filter.
I almost have to lol at this. I just replaced my ops, and when I took the intake off, I laid it upside down on the bench. Two days later I looked in the intake runners, and there was a small pool of oil in each one.
My car will never be without a catch can, of some kind.
Last edited by randy814u; Dec 8, 2006 at 12:26 PM.