When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
... EHS is saying his car is making stock 01 ls6 power with an ls6 manifold, slightly larger throttle body, and an uncorked air-cleaner. That sounds reasonable at least to me.
There are so many cars here making over 600 rwhp, there really is not going to much glory in trying to misrepresent a car as having 330ish rwhp - why would EHS be lying?
best regards-
mqqn
mggn
-- thanks for being civil, when others are as courteous as you, I'll respond to them as well.
In the mean time, I didn't bother dynoing my car in stock form, becasue I assumed that it put out what most cars. For example, a quick web search turned up this (a 2000 automatic):
I guess I'm dreaming 337/336 at the rear wheels on my 2000 MN6 convertible, about as much as an '01 Z06.
Originally Posted by EHS
mggn
-- thanks for being civil, when others are as courteous as you, I'll respond to them as well.
In the mean time, I didn't bother dynoing my car in stock form, becasue I assumed that it put out what most cars. For example, a quick web search turned up this (a 2000 automatic):
Whatever, bro. Your initial post implied that all you had was a Blackwing and it got you to 337 rwhp.
Whatever, bro. Your initial post implied that all you had was a Blackwing and it got you to 337 rwhp.
And when asked about other mods you said NONE.
In the mean time, I didn't bother dynoing my car in stock form, becasue I assumed that it put out what most cars. For example, a quick web search turned up this (
This has nothing to do with anything because when you did Dyno it you did have the other mods. You implied stongly when questioned that you had no other mods.
mggn
-- thanks for being civil, when others are as courteous as you, I'll respond to them as well.
What's not being "Civil" about asking you why you intentionally misled poeple on this thread?
Not doing a baseline dyno on a car before doing mods means you don't know where you started. Assuming the numbers of other cars is just that, an assumption. The LS1/LS6 falls within a range. But that range does have some skew to it. Then you get the oddball ones that just throw the scale out the window. My 02 Z06 came in on the low side of the scale. Just that particular LS6 and the generic factory settings. After getting a dyno tune I ended up on the higher side with no mods.
So you could get anywhere from 3-15rwhp depending on your specific car and how it reacts to that specific mod and what the ambient temp/humidity is that day. But with no baseline dyno it is simply conjecture as to what the mod did. And when you stack several mods together and then dyno you won't know what each was good for. Just what the "package" created. I won't dyno again until I install LTs with high flow cats. Then I'll get a retune after a baseline pull.
Many of these aftermarket parts are hyped up by the vendors. They setup "special" conditions to make sure they get the best result or leave out some facts. You can't blame folks for being suspicious about it. Especially when you add in the Corvette Tax to the cost of the part...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vega$Vette
With no other mods like maybe a throttle body, L6 intake, Corsa Catback?? Oh did you forget to mention extensive Dyno Tuning?
What did this mean? You answered as follows:
You didn't, and there wasn't any involved.
I'm not the only one here that believes you strongly implied that a Blackwing was the only mod you had.
Why didn't you just say originally "BTW I also have these other mods"?
No hard feeling here. I'm just trying to point out that peoples decisions are made based on information they glean from the Forum. If that info is not accurate or omits facts then it is a disservice to us all.
I'm not the only one here that believes you strongly implied that a Blackwing was the only mod you had.
Why didn't you just say originally "BTW I also have these other mods"?
No hard feeling here. I'm just trying to point out that peoples decisions are made based on information they glean from the Forum. If that info is not accurate or omits facts then it is a disservice to us all.
Sorry -- I meant that only in response to was any tuning involved.
Gee, my '04 A4 WITH a Blackwing and Corsa on the dyno only came up with 292 rwhp and 311 rwtq. And it came stock with the LS6 intake.
Guess mine's a real factory dog, ehh? Funny thing though, when I speak to Corvette owners outside of this forum, my numbers seem to be right in line with the majority as to what they should be.
I suppose it is not beyond the real of believability that the factory computer tune could factor into rwhp. We are talking about 15% variability here, the number I generally have heard accepted as the power-train parasitic loss (drive-line friction).
So - bear with me - if you can get 15 or 20 rwhp with a professional dyno tune, and considering that C5's are operated in varying climates, couldn't a car that by chance had a very spot factory tune achieve a 15% higher rwhp number?
So it is (at least to me) entirely possible that a car with a blackwing, a catback and a larger tb could show 30rwhp more than a bone stock c5 that was not as well tuned from the factory.
Hopefully someone who knows more about the heuristic tuning that the stock software can do could comment on how much variability there is in the factory tune.
Vegas and EHS - you both are trying to help out the forum - good job understanding and accepting (eventually ) each others point of view.
My '97 mn6 with stock tune (345 hp from the fatory) netted a 308.84 hp and 317.21 tq with a blackwing and Corsa touring catback. The Dyno was done on a mobil dyno by a forum member at the National Corvette Museum No tune and stock internals. Take from that what you will but for those that are claiming zero are just plain wrong. While an intake will not make the gains that most of the sites claim they will net something. The stock airbox on a C5 is pathetic. The car needs to breath free and the intake and to a lesser extent the exhaust changes will help it make more power. With what has come to be expected for baseline information on the early C5's It would seem that my intake and catback netted total somewhere between 8 and 13 or so hp at the wheels. YMMV.
Gee, my '04 A4 WITH a Blackwing and Corsa on the dyno only came up with 292 rwhp and 311 rwtq. And it came stock with the LS6 intake.
Guess mine's a real factory dog, ehh? Funny thing though, when I speak to Corvette owners outside of this forum, my numbers seem to be right in line with the majority as to what they should be.
Why do you (rhetorically) feel that is?
Yours is an automatic though. A4's will have more driveline loss than a MN6. MN6 typically will have 10-11% driveline loss from engine , where A4's will have closer to 18% loss.
Engine = 345 hp - 18% = 283hp , so your's is not bad at all for stock.
It would take me quit a while to find the old dyno sheets and there could and will be difference in dyno's due to weather conditions and dyno's themselves, but my '99 MN6 got 301 with a Blackwing, and descreen MAF. And that is everything else stock (This was done at a car show in summer of 2004). Never did get a baseline without it, but don't think it would have been much less. Most MN6's that I have seen hear are right around 295-300.
Later after adding Long tube headers (RK Sports), Corsa Catbacks (Indy Pace car) and a LS6 intake, it got 331 HP. That was tested by Doug Rippie right before he did a tune, and after the tune it came out at 345 rwhp. (sping 2005)
With that in mind. I would say that the Blackwing didn't help more than 2-3 hp with the screen out, and the exhaust change was probably the better hp gain. Letting the car breath the spent gasses out better has to be a big improvement.
Then the tune was next best improvement for the $$$$, probably even better than the exhaust. It's just that you have to do those first to see the big improvemnt in the tune.
Last edited by HawkIVette; Dec 15, 2006 at 08:30 PM.
Yours is an automatic though. A4's will have more driveline loss than a MN6. MN6 typically will have 10-11% driveline loss from engine , where A4's will have closer to 18% loss.
Engine = 345 hp - 18% = 283hp , so your's is not bad at all for stock.
Your % are off. A4's are approx. 14% stock.
My '04 A4 Dynoed 308 RWHP with Corsa Catback only. That was before mods. Most stock C5's (350 hp M6 and A4) come in at 300-310 RWHP
My '04 A4 Dynoed 308 RWHP with Corsa Catback only. That was before mods. Most stock C5's (350 hp M6 and A4) come in at 300-310 RWHP
And now wait a minute.
But you said 308 was with Corsa Catback installed, right? But the next sentence says
Originally Posted by Vega$Vette
That was before mods.
Well, which is it - before mods 308 or after the catback install. Since when is a catback not a mod? Don't you think that helped the 308 more than just 7? Probably more like 10-12 Hp for the catback?
But you said 308 was with Corsa Catback installed, right? But the next sentence says
Well, which is it - before mods 308 or after the catback install. Since when is a catback not a mod? Don't you think that helped the 308 more than just 7? Probably more like 10-12 Hp for the catback?