Friggin ethanol!!!!
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 12
From: Los Angeles California
All of this information is old.
I have to say, you've been miss-informed.
5 major issues
a) Ethanol has less energy per unit volume and as a result burns less effeciant. E85 cars have been reported to get 10-15% less milage than a standard petrol car.
Not anymore. That's an old figure. The current figures are now between 1-5% less. This makes up for the cost now.
b) Ethanol has to be transported by truck because it corrodes the pipelines. This costs more enviornmentally and financially.
This is a myth. Ethanol doesn't corrode copper piping. The studies for this show that it's not the corrosion but actually the mount of water E85 picks up over long distances.
c) Subsidized farmland for ethanol has caused a significant rise in the cost of food across the market
Total BS. Sorry, but more than 50% of ethanol comes from South America. In addition, the corn used to make ethanol has nothing to do with our food stock. The bi-product of making ethanol from corn is actually the food they use to feed live stock. There are separate fields set aside for ethanol. When E85 was emerging as a serious competitor against the E10 blends, this was a scare tactic that farmers used in their favor to raise prices on food. However, it's completely untrue and totally debunked.
d) Stored ethanol has a tendancy to go bad faster than pure petrol.
Alcohol doesn't go bad. However, petrol can. Alcohol merely attracts and retains water.
e) Ethonal gasolines actully cost more to make/refine and distribute than traditional petrol.
Back in the days when E85 was new, that was true. Because of mass production, this is no longer true, which is way E85 is cheaper per gallon than E10 and E15. Gasoline has been made in mass quantity for a VERY long time. However, Ethanol has only been widely used for the last 15 years and even then in small amounts in the gasoline blends. Now that E85 is a primary blend, production had to be ramped up. The cost to make E85 is now significantly lower than before.
Why then do we use a less-effecient/more expensive additive in our fuels?....you'll have to see PR&C for that answer......
a) Ethanol has less energy per unit volume and as a result burns less effeciant. E85 cars have been reported to get 10-15% less milage than a standard petrol car.
Not anymore. That's an old figure. The current figures are now between 1-5% less. This makes up for the cost now.
b) Ethanol has to be transported by truck because it corrodes the pipelines. This costs more enviornmentally and financially.
This is a myth. Ethanol doesn't corrode copper piping. The studies for this show that it's not the corrosion but actually the mount of water E85 picks up over long distances.
c) Subsidized farmland for ethanol has caused a significant rise in the cost of food across the market
Total BS. Sorry, but more than 50% of ethanol comes from South America. In addition, the corn used to make ethanol has nothing to do with our food stock. The bi-product of making ethanol from corn is actually the food they use to feed live stock. There are separate fields set aside for ethanol. When E85 was emerging as a serious competitor against the E10 blends, this was a scare tactic that farmers used in their favor to raise prices on food. However, it's completely untrue and totally debunked.
d) Stored ethanol has a tendancy to go bad faster than pure petrol.
Alcohol doesn't go bad. However, petrol can. Alcohol merely attracts and retains water.
e) Ethonal gasolines actully cost more to make/refine and distribute than traditional petrol.
Back in the days when E85 was new, that was true. Because of mass production, this is no longer true, which is way E85 is cheaper per gallon than E10 and E15. Gasoline has been made in mass quantity for a VERY long time. However, Ethanol has only been widely used for the last 15 years and even then in small amounts in the gasoline blends. Now that E85 is a primary blend, production had to be ramped up. The cost to make E85 is now significantly lower than before.
Why then do we use a less-effecient/more expensive additive in our fuels?....you'll have to see PR&C for that answer......
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 12
From: Los Angeles California
Sorry disagree with this information. Now I've had quite a few Lsx based motors including the monster I have now.
If you don't mess with the tuning table it is fine to run 87 even at 6500 rpms.
The computer has 2 tables for timing a high octane table and low octane table. The low will default if the computer see that there is ping for xxx period of time. Yes you will loose some ponies but your not going to blow up the motor. Gm did this on purpose to control warranty claims. Do you think the C6's that Hertz rents out ends with premium every time? The additional backup is the knock sensor which will also cut timing if needed. Another reason why the motors are one of the best designs in history.
You can't compare a LT1 based car with a LSX. The design of the motor and computer is much smarter then the older design. If your broke and need to get to work go ahead put 86 in you'll just get there a little slower.
If you don't mess with the tuning table it is fine to run 87 even at 6500 rpms.
The computer has 2 tables for timing a high octane table and low octane table. The low will default if the computer see that there is ping for xxx period of time. Yes you will loose some ponies but your not going to blow up the motor. Gm did this on purpose to control warranty claims. Do you think the C6's that Hertz rents out ends with premium every time? The additional backup is the knock sensor which will also cut timing if needed. Another reason why the motors are one of the best designs in history.
You can't compare a LT1 based car with a LSX. The design of the motor and computer is much smarter then the older design. If your broke and need to get to work go ahead put 86 in you'll just get there a little slower.
The computer doesn't react instantly to this change. This I know. And yeah, I agree, the LS1 is definitely smarter and different from an LT1. But the point is that higher compressions DO call for higher octane.
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,364
Likes: 6
From: Rocky Mount Virginia
I agree with this. But it takes a bit of time for your LSx motor to reconfigure the timing for 87 when you've been running 91 for a while. (I think it was about 20 miles, I could be wrong) And in the meantime you ping for a while.
The computer doesn't react instantly to this change. This I know. And yeah, I agree, the LS1 is definitely smarter and different from an LT1. But the point is that higher compressions DO call for higher octane.
The computer doesn't react instantly to this change. This I know. And yeah, I agree, the LS1 is definitely smarter and different from an LT1. But the point is that higher compressions DO call for higher octane.
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 12
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by VinnyT
Can you link the correct info then?
http://www.flexfuelkit.com.au/articl...ths/Page1.html
Just google E85 myths... There's a lot of BS talk about how E85 is bad. But the truth is that most people listen to Fox News and don't do research of their own. If you actually look things up, you'll see that 90% of the information your fed is either bent or broken by the time it actually reaches your ears. OPEC and "others" have made it a point to scare people away from buying E85 vehicles.
You should also know that a lot of FAST race cars only use alcohol. MANY use E85 because it can net extremely big gains over Gasoline. In fact, with turbo applications, the boost can be raised much higher because E85 burns cooler and has a very high octane rating.
Race Director
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,030
Likes: 10
From: Prescott AZ
St. Jude Donor '04
I agree with this. But it takes a bit of time for your LSx motor to reconfigure the timing for 87 when you've been running 91 for a while. (I think it was about 20 miles, I could be wrong) And in the meantime you ping for a while.
The computer doesn't react instantly to this change. This I know. And yeah, I agree, the LS1 is definitely smarter and different from an LT1. But the point is that higher compressions DO call for higher octane.
The computer doesn't react instantly to this change. This I know. And yeah, I agree, the LS1 is definitely smarter and different from an LT1. But the point is that higher compressions DO call for higher octane.
I've tuned some of my cars and still have a scan tool it will switch to that low octane table pretty fast if your on it. If you drive it easy it won't even switch because there is no knock.
I've had 10 Lsx based corvettes and 5 fbody lsx cars. One the main reasons why these cars ping is with the higher miles they get a good amount of carbon build up in the motor. Seafoam them and generally it goes away.
Thread Starter
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,364
Likes: 6
From: Rocky Mount Virginia
a) Ethanol has less energy per unit volume and as a result burns less effeciant. E85 cars have been reported to get 10-15% less milage than a standard petrol car.
Not anymore. That's an old figure. The current figures are now between 1-5% less. This makes up for the cost now
Not anymore. That's an old figure. The current figures are now between 1-5% less. This makes up for the cost now
Race Director
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,901
Likes: 18
From: Elko, Nevada
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
Race Director
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,030
Likes: 10
From: Prescott AZ
St. Jude Donor '04
This is true. E85 burns cooler which = less detonation
Race Director
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,901
Likes: 18
From: Elko, Nevada
d) Stored ethanol has a tendancy to go bad faster than pure petrol.
Alcohol doesn't go bad. However, petrol can. Alcohol merely attracts and retains water
Which has become a major issue for the stations underground tanks and why you are seeing so many stations all over the US replacing them with new and improved tanks that can evaporate the accumulated water before it becomes a measurable amount.
Alcohol doesn't go bad. However, petrol can. Alcohol merely attracts and retains water
Which has become a major issue for the stations underground tanks and why you are seeing so many stations all over the US replacing them with new and improved tanks that can evaporate the accumulated water before it becomes a measurable amount.
Drifting
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
From: Boston MA
5 major issues
a) Ethanol has less energy per unit volume and as a result burns less effeciant. E85 cars have been reported to get 10-15% less milage than a standard petrol car.
b) Ethanol has to be transported by truck because it corrodes the pipelines. This costs more enviornmentally and financially.
c) Subsidized farmland for ethanol has caused a significant rise in the cost of food across the market
d) Stored ethanol has a tendancy to go bad faster than pure petrol.
e) Ethonal gasolines actully cost more to make/refine and distribute than traditional petrol.
Why then do we use a less-effecient/more expensive additive in our fuels?....you'll have to see PR&C for that answer......
a) Ethanol has less energy per unit volume and as a result burns less effeciant. E85 cars have been reported to get 10-15% less milage than a standard petrol car.
b) Ethanol has to be transported by truck because it corrodes the pipelines. This costs more enviornmentally and financially.
c) Subsidized farmland for ethanol has caused a significant rise in the cost of food across the market
d) Stored ethanol has a tendancy to go bad faster than pure petrol.
e) Ethonal gasolines actully cost more to make/refine and distribute than traditional petrol.
Why then do we use a less-effecient/more expensive additive in our fuels?....you'll have to see PR&C for that answer......
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 368,112
Likes: 24,733
From: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '25
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
Just about every pump around here has it in the blend. Won't hurt the car, but might get a bit less mpg.
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 12
From: Los Angeles California
Right. Those are also pretty old, but it was to state a general point. And I believe that one of them says that with proper tuning, you don't see a mileage change at all.
I'm trying to find the articles I read about the 1-5% drop. When I find it, I'll post it.
I'm trying to find the articles I read about the 1-5% drop. When I find it, I'll post it.
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 12
From: Los Angeles California
d) Stored ethanol has a tendancy to go bad faster than pure petrol.
Alcohol doesn't go bad. However, petrol can. Alcohol merely attracts and retains water
Which has become a major issue for the stations underground tanks and why you are seeing so many stations all over the US replacing them with new and improved tanks that can evaporate the accumulated water before it becomes a measurable amount.
Alcohol doesn't go bad. However, petrol can. Alcohol merely attracts and retains water
Which has become a major issue for the stations underground tanks and why you are seeing so many stations all over the US replacing them with new and improved tanks that can evaporate the accumulated water before it becomes a measurable amount.
Melting Slicks
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 61
From: Fort Wayne IN
5 major issues
a) Ethanol has less energy per unit volume and as a result burns less effeciant. E85 cars have been reported to get 10-15% less milage than a standard petrol car.
b) Ethanol has to be transported by truck because it corrodes the pipelines. This costs more enviornmentally and financially.
c) Subsidized farmland for ethanol has caused a significant rise in the cost of food across the market
d) Stored ethanol has a tendancy to go bad faster than pure petrol.
e) Ethonal gasolines actully cost more to make/refine and distribute than traditional petrol.
Why then do we use a less-effecient/more expensive additive in our fuels?....you'll have to see PR&C for that answer......
a) Ethanol has less energy per unit volume and as a result burns less effeciant. E85 cars have been reported to get 10-15% less milage than a standard petrol car.
b) Ethanol has to be transported by truck because it corrodes the pipelines. This costs more enviornmentally and financially.
c) Subsidized farmland for ethanol has caused a significant rise in the cost of food across the market
d) Stored ethanol has a tendancy to go bad faster than pure petrol.
e) Ethonal gasolines actully cost more to make/refine and distribute than traditional petrol.
Why then do we use a less-effecient/more expensive additive in our fuels?....you'll have to see PR&C for that answer......
Around here the Shell and Meijers gas stations are still all real gasoline. I've tested the shell numerous times because that's what I run in my airplane. Ethanol is a big time no no in older a/c.
OMG 
Melting Slicks
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,798
Likes: 8
From: It's true money can't buy happiness, but it is more comfortable crying in a Corvette than on a bicyc
St. Jude Donor '13