When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Well ok, how about 93 octane fuel? Pretty sure I could have more timing put in on that over the 91 here in California.
What is so funny is you are so willing to discount this as impossible when in reality it really is possible. You don't know what his friend's tuner did, you don't know what fuel he is running. His motor could be ready to blow up to produce peak numbers.
You are merely saying it is impossible. This I can tell you. My Z06 is a **** TON faster than my Vert, and my Z was trapping 4 mph higher than the next closest Z and 5 mph faster than a Porsche 911 Turbo.
What that relates to in HP you tell me.
My Z trapped 118.5 mph with a 2700ft DA and 383rwhp, compared to your 116mph. Just saying. Dyno's vary. They are a tool, unless you pull the engine and strap it to an engine dyno, it's really a ballpark guess.
Well ok, how about 93 octane fuel? Pretty sure I could have more timing put in on that over the 91 here in California.
What is so funny is you are so willing to discount this as impossible when in reality it really is possible. You don't know what his friend's tuner did, you don't know what fuel he is running. His motor could be ready to blow up to produce peak numbers.
You are merely saying it is impossible. This I can tell you. My Z06 is a **** TON faster than my Vert, and my Z was trapping 4 mph higher than the next closest Z and 5 mph faster than a Porsche 911 Turbo.
What that relates to in HP you tell me.
Driver skill and tires can have a huge impact on trap speed...just because you add an EWP, UDP, light weight clutch and wheels and gain 50rwhp doesn't mean your engine is making 55 more hp at the crank...the ls6 is just not going to pick up 84hp from bolt-ons, unless you can register the extra 40hp the vararam is adding at 170mph
My Z trapped 118.5 mph with a 2700ft DA and 383rwhp, compared to your 116mph. Just saying. Dyno's vary. They are a tool, unless you pull the engine and strap it to an engine dyno, it's really a ballpark guess.
Well my DA was slightly higher, and my 116 was actually 116.6 versus your 118.5 and it was also my first time to the track, running street tires on a horrible 60'.
Maybe with my car you could do better than I could and the general rule of thumb is 15% driveline loss. Again like you say with dynos it is a "guide" and they can all be different. So his friend's "different dyno" factoring in the "generally accepted 15% M6 driveline loss" 489 HP is possible without a cam.
BTW there wasn't a whole hell of a lot of difference between a car my tuner did with your mods and yours as far as numbers go.
Mine was higher because I spent $1000 for 10 HP which is something you weren't willing to do, but since it was to compliment a future H/C package I did it.
Would it make you feel better if I spent the $100 to go down the street to another well known tuner and try his dyno out, or will his be wrong too?
Driver skill and tires can have a huge impact on trap speed...just because you add an EWP, UDP, light weight clutch and wheels and gain 50rwhp doesn't mean your engine is making 55 more hp at the crank...the ls6 is just not going to pick up 84hp from bolt-ons, unless you can register the extra 40hp the vararam is adding at 170mph
If we factor a 15% driveline loss and a typical dyno number at 360rwhp, then a stock LS6 wouldn't be picking up 84 HP from bolt-ons. Since it would be rated higher stock than the factory advertised 405 hp.
I can't seem to recall what L88s were rated from the factory...can you help me remember? I seem to recall they have been putting out just a little bit more than that number
I don't think there are any factory freaks anymore since the start of the LSx motors. Although it's a shame. I had a factory freak once. Thing hauled *** and nobody knew why.
LS6's are all under-rated from the factory. They make 360RWHP on most dynos. That means they're making over 420BHP. The 01 LS6's were under-rated too making 340+RWHP on most dynos making them around 400BHP.
aww man i i wish mine woulda done that....granted i hadnt done a tune up to the car when i first purchased it before dynoing it. The owner before had only done oil changes and nothing else. My car, when it was stock, dynoed a weak 320rwhp and 318tq on a dyno jet in 78-80* weather in October.
aww man i i wish mine woulda done that....granted i hadnt done a tune up to the car when i first purchased it before dynoing it. The owner before had only done oil changes and nothing else. My car, when it was stock, dynoed a weak 320rwhp and 318tq on a dyno jet in 78-80* weather in October.
A tune up makes a world of difference. Especially on motors with 50K+ miles. Mine dyno'd 355RWHP on the first shot. But the AFR was 10.5:1 so it was obviously running rich.
Do you know what the AFR on yours was? Did it have any intake mods? That often changes a lot on a dyno if the car's been driven on the intake mods for a while and THEN dyno'd. CAIs sometimes lower the AFR on the dyno because the car gets more air while moving.
A tune up makes a world of difference. Especially on motors with 50K+ miles. Mine dyno'd 355RWHP on the first shot. But the AFR was 10.5:1 so it was obviously running rich.
Do you know what the AFR on yours was? Did it have any intake mods? That often changes a lot on a dyno if the car's been driven on the intake mods for a while and THEN dyno'd. CAIs sometimes lower the AFR on the dyno because the car gets more air while moving.
You know honestly i dont know. I dynoed it an LSX shootout 2 1/2 years ago with a couple freinds. I didnt have a wideband on her. It 45k on her at the time. BONE STOCK. When i did tune her up, it did have a lil more pep. The filter was NASTY lookin and the plugs needed changing as well. My mods now (at the moment) are Vararam, LG Streets, and Corsa Exhaust...wires, shifter, yata yata. Just from the header install alone, it gained 24rwhp and 22tq, after my mechanic/tuner was finished, she gained a total of 42rwhp and 42tq. Not bad for headers and exhaust.
If we factor a 15% driveline loss and a typical dyno number at 360rwhp, then a stock LS6 wouldn't be picking up 84 HP from bolt-ons. Since it would be rated higher stock than the factory advertised 405 hp.
I can't seem to recall what L88s were rated from the factory...can you help me remember? I seem to recall they have been putting out just a little bit more than that number
The L88 wasn't SAE rated, this isn't the late '60's(although I did own a '72 377ciV8 Vega) Drivetrain loss isn't 15% on the Z06, it's ~12.5%(ask Katech) even less if you're running a lightweight clutch, tires and no engine accessories hooked up...my car put down 461rwhpSAE with my custom 218* cam, what do you think it makes at the crank?
If we factor a 15% driveline loss and a typical dyno number at 360rwhp, then a stock LS6 wouldn't be picking up 84 HP from bolt-ons. Since it would be rated higher stock than the factory advertised 405 hp.
I can't seem to recall what L88s were rated from the factory...can you help me remember? I seem to recall they have been putting out just a little bit more than that number
It's been well documented over the last decade+ that an N/A manual C5 is around 12% loss to the wheels. But if it makes you feel better to say your car has more HP than it does then keep going by the 15% rule. It may still be in the ballpark but it's way out there in left field
More like 380 without a cam on 100 octane asd aggressive tune, 360 on 93 octane
cam and PP heads are the big key to HP.
then mid 400s on 93 octane
A friend on here made 376 rwhp with ARH high flow cats x pipe, the stock Ti Exhaust and a blackwing CAI on 93 oct. He had some valvetrain issues as well. Tuner said it should have had higher numbers.
Nobody's asked about these aftermarket valves that were mentioned, does the guy have ported heads? I think one could probably squeak out 400whp with a stock cam and ported heads. We can all agree LTs, CAI, and a tune get the LS6 to around 385whp and 15whp is a pretty reasonable expectation from heads alone. If you factor in an erroneous drivetrain loss of 18%, there's your ~489 at the crank.
Guys,
My good friend,that I do not want to argue with,says his 2004 Z06 makes 489 horses at the fly wheel. The car is modified with the following: CAI, headers, borla exhaust, tighter valve spings and some kind of different valves. He has not changed his cam.
What are your thoughts here? With only these mods, wouldn't he be fortunate to get to 450 horses?
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.