When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I think that GM was the only car company that used the term big block & small block.
No. Ford used it too. The 260 289 302 were the small blocks and the 332 to 428 were the big blocks. Small blocks competed against each other in the Trans Am series and the big blocks in NASCAR back in the 60s and 70s.
It seems that there are many different ways of saying if it is a BG BLOCK or a SMALL BLOCK.
I was just wondering (Barette Jackson, sp? ) because I’m watching them refer to this car having one or the other. I seriously doubt they have any idea of what they are talking about
After reading all of the different explanations here I’m still confused. All of the technical descriptions seem different in certain ways. Maybe everybody is saying the same thing
After reading all of the different explanations here I’m still confused. All of the technical descriptions seem different in certain ways. Maybe everybody is saying the same thing
As it's said, a picture is worth a thousand words.
First, a 1967 Mustang with a small block.
Now, a 1967 Mustang with a big block.
Notice how much more compact the small block is than the big block? The small block is 'smaller' than the big block. It's really that simple.
So this may show how "old school" I am, and maybe not kept up with the times I am not as familiar with the engines today and their designations/sizes.
Back in the day, the (GM) 350ci was the biggest displacement small block you could get. The 396ci was the smallest big block, and then there was the 427ci and the 454ci displacement big block.
The reason you could get a bigger displacement on the big blocks was that the bore centres on them were wider spaced, giving the opportunity to have a bigger hole for the piston. The block was therefore somewhat bigger, not sure what the outside dimensions were but it was longer and taller than the small block.
Small block - small displacement
Big Block - Big displacement
More displacement = MORE POWER!!
I have the best of both worlds: an LSX 454. that is 700+ hp all motor
A while ago there was a story here about a guy who had put an honest-to-God 502ci big block GM crate engine they used to produce into a C5 - involved modding the frame for clearance, IIRC. Big blocks have gobs of torque and provide "instant" response to your right foot - at any revs. I once read road test writer say that driving a 'big block" classic Stingray, was like riding a powerful bike - point it, tap the gas, and it's there, instantly.
You really want to see a tight fitting big block in a car designed for a small block, look at a 429 Boss Mustang - they had to modify the inner fenders to get it in.
Last edited by jackthelad; Jan 25, 2015 at 03:14 PM.
I'm still a little confused. How can you have a 427 big block and a 427 small block? What makes one a big block and the other a small block? Or do car companies just call it what they want?
I'm still a little confused. How can you have a 427 big block and a 427 small block? What makes one a big block and the other a small block? Or do car companies just call it what they want?
It is the physical size of the engine block and heads, not the displacement of the engine itself, that make the distinction.
Looking at it today, without understanding the evolution of various engine families, it doesn't make much sense. If you grew up reading car magazines in the 60's and 70's and lusting after various hi-po small blocks and big blocks, you would have a much better understanding.
Try this: the difference between a big block and a small block is the the cylinder center-to-center distance. So a LS1 is a small block because it has [approximately] the same C-C distance as say, a 327, 283, etc. I think it is 4 inches but not sure about that. A big block has a larger distance. So even though the old 348 of the '50's is only 1 cu-in bigger than a LS1 it is a big block because of this measurement. So , sure the heads won't fit. The block has to be bigger to take care of the bigger c-c.
A set of 348/409 heads would be a sight under the hood of a C5!!!!
It's still GM that started the term Big & Small! Ford and Chrysler back in my old days.lol never used the term big block and small block, just cubic inches at least that's the way it was in Detroit.
It's still GM that started the term Big & Small! Ford and Chrysler back in my old days.lol never used the term big block and small block, just cubic inches at least that's the way it was in Detroit.
In 69 my first car was a '64 Fairlane with a 289 small block in it. Back then Fords were referred to as big blocks and small blocks. I remember well. It's how they differentiated between the two engine series. I do not know who started it or when.
I guess it depends on which part of the country your from. But the people in and around Detroit never called a ford,big and small, it was a big No No! Lol. Whatever..