When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's been my experience that DT will get you whatever tires you're looking for if you request them, I just didn't see these tires listed on their website...
Loved the Goodyear F1DSG3 but they don't make them in OEM sizes for the C5 anymore. Now have Nitto 555's and like them equally well. [insert runflat vs non runflat argument HERE]
Been looking at those myself. I have been super happy with the performance and wear of the Nittos that I put on my dually. Thanks for the feedback.
NOT true.....just wait til you get a flat or blowout then tell me which tire you want.
My car came with runflats. Rode rough as hell. Potenza Summer tires turned it into a different car. Much more fun to drive. Punctures yes, but a runflat may not help you with a blowout. They can come apart and destroy your car if driven on. I don't really worry about flats. If it happens I will handle it. Not a big deal. Life is too short to worry about getting a flat.
My car came with runflats. Rode rough as hell. Potenza Summer tires turned it into a different car. Much more fun to drive. Punctures yes, but a runflat may not help you with a blowout. They can come apart and destroy your car if driven on. I don't really worry about flats. If it happens I will handle it. Not a big deal. Life is too short to worry about getting a flat.
In my 44 years of driving, I've had exactly 1 blowout...I'll take my chances with the non-run flats...
NOT true.....just wait til you get a flat or blowout then tell me which tire you want.
Apples to apples, runflats will always ride rougher than a comparable non-runflat tire. The stiffness in the sidewall that allows them to run with zero pressure is also what makes the ride rougher. I'm young enough to handle a patch myself, I carry a patch kit in my car.
The original runflats had a 300 mile range running flat due to stiff sidewalls on both sides of the tire, and were extra rough due to it. The new Michelin A/S 3+ ZPs have a 50 mile range due to having stiffness on only the inner side, at least, that's what I read. 50 miles is generally more than sufficient though IMO.
Apples to apples, runflats will always ride rougher than a comparable non-runflat tire. The stiffness in the sidewall that allows them to run with zero pressure is also what makes the ride rougher. I'm young enough to handle a patch myself, I carry a patch kit in my car.
The original runflats had a 300 mile range running flat due to stiff sidewalls on both sides of the tire, and were extra rough due to it. The new Michelin A/S 3+ ZPs have a 50 mile range due to having stiffness on only the inner side, at least, that's what I read. 50 miles is generally more than sufficient though IMO.
Not sure 50 miles would be enough to find a shop that will patch it. Many times shops will not fix run flats that have been driven some distance. They do lose their structural integrity. Finding a matching tire may open a new can of worms. One more thing they can worry about.
A lot of experts on run flats. I’d like to know how much time they have had with them to really comment. From the GY’s of 20 years ago to the Michelin of today can not be compared. Until you have experienced all of them you are not qualified to comment because you haven’t driven on them. I can’t afford to put cheap tires on my corvette
A lot of experts on run flats. I’d like to know how much time they have had with them to really comment. From the GY’s of 20 years ago to the Michelin of today can not be compared. Until you have experienced all of them you are not qualified to comment because you haven’t driven on them.
I am sure they are better than tires of the past, but they are still a compromise. The sidewalls must be stiff enough to support the car's weight with zero pressure. That is a fact. Have you driven a C5 with Ultra high performance summer tires?