CLB Rant!!!


I heard the same thing. And from what I have read about the CLB and what the shop manual says it consists of. I can't see spending $50 on it. As far as I can see it consists of a resistor attached to two of the wires. And the other two are shorted together to simulate the internal switch that tells the computer that the lock is disengaged. And whoever is making them is making a killing.
I know that most here don't probably want to hear this, but there's nothing in the column lock but a motor and a switch. It's not rocket science. Just like the CAGS eliminator is a .02 resistor which when put in a package is worth $20. At least the connectors that come with it are worthy of the cost.
The CLB has 4 wires stuck into a blob of black plastic with a connector that plugs into the cars wiring harness. The fear factor adds $30 to the CAGS factor.
I will probably get the dealer to put in the A4 bypass so that I have a GM approved device that won't throw codes or screw anything up in the long run. Or someone could really help out the Corvette fraternity and post the real fix to bypassing the lock. Like the way GM does for the A4. Wouldn't that be a great thing for us here on this forum.
But as you all know money is driving this whole issue. GM doesn't want to put their asses in a sling by recalling all MN6's for new column locks that actually work. So they mickey mouse it and hope it goes away. Members here have had the recall done. And the next day the column lock locks up on them again. So the recall doesn't work!!!!! And they don't want to replace the lock with one that works. To expensive!!!!! They should give the owners the choice to put in the A4's harness bypass and be done with it. But there's probably something legal stopping them from doing this. But they still won't put locks that will work into the cars. To expensive!!!!!
So what do you do?? Resist the recall and put your self in danger? Put in a non-GM part sold in the aftermarket to bypass the lock and then possibly trash your computers system because it's not designed properly. But you feel obligated to yourself because you don't want to have to deal with the column locking when your going around a corner at 50 mph and then turn into the other lane and do a head on. But GM won't replace the lock because it's to expensive!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Damn I mad about this!!!!!! Sorry for the rant but I finally had enough and had to vent.
There are my thoughts. And I also think it would be appropriate that Someone steps up with the right fix to eliminating the lock. Properly, so that there are no issues with the computer system on the car. This is a safety issue. I don't give a damn if my car is easier to steal. To hell with the thieves, take care of me, the buyer of the car, not the thief that MIGHT steal my car. And I promise not to let any kids in the car that might put the stick into neutral, which would possibly cause an accident. I'll take that chance.
Thank you very much for listening.
I hope it all made sense.
From what I have learned the steering wheel locking system was never for anti-theft protection but was for Federal safety requirements. The trans or steering wheel must lock. The auto just happens to do both.
If I'm off on this someone please educate me.


Now it may not be worth $50 but as an ex-member of the "I'm not paying that, I can make one myself" school of bodgers, I'm here to tell everyone that, sure, if you want a load of cut wires and a bodged up car with trailing wires and gaffer tape then go ahead. However, I lack the skill to construct or mould a part that looks neat and professional and won't give me nightmares and I'm more than happy to pay for CAGS and CLB's that will fit easily and neatly and look reasonably professional. Making them easy to fit saves on installation costs anyway.
The other thing worth bearing in mind is that past attempts to "make something myself" usually involve half a dozen trips to buy something I forgot, using precious gas, the parts you need are usually far more than necessary and you end up paying that price anyway for something that looks like it was done by a 4 year old.
Are we sure this will happen? In my letter it doesn't state what changes will be done with the PCM reprogram. Where is the info on what takes place with the reprogram?



The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Who wants to go through all that hassel again! They dealer used to replace the Cloumn Lock Motor itself. The problem is, it was a factory replacement. The exact same part number and everything that came in the car. Of course it will keep failing too. Just fork over the $50 and be done with it! I havent had a probnlem since!
My question to the masses is, has anyone had, or heard of anyone having a problem with their BCM (or PCM?) directly attributable to having installed a CLB?









column lock
Rob








Rob
Also the motor is a DC motor which turns in both directions. It gets power for about 1 second on startup and another 1 second reversed polarity on key removal. And it's spring loaded so that if the column is not in line, when turned it aligns and snaps into the lock postion. I have been looking at the circuit in the shop manual. When it turns on or off it also makes and breaks a set of dry contacts, which the computer monitors. And it would be that signal which would shutdown the fuel if the car was running and the column was showing locked.Another tid bit.










