When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I went from 3:42s to a new DTE differential 4:10s. Huge huge performance difference. Depends what you are looking for really, i wanted performance and i felt 3:42s were too sluggish. Most with autos i think are going with 342s for some reason. I had an auto with 273 and went to 410s with 2500 stall. that was a nice difference too.
good luck
I went from 3:42s to a new DTE differential 4:10s. Huge huge performance difference. Depends what you are looking for really, i wanted performance and i felt 3:42s were too sluggish. Most with autos i think are going with 342s for some reason. I had an auto with 273 and went to 410s with 2500 stall. that was a nice difference too.
good luck
Well, I was curious as to why that is the case...3:42s and not 3:73s?
The reason why is because 3.42s are arguably the best option for the A4 in our cars.
Excellent performance, won't kill your gas mileage, engine RPMs reasonable on highway cruising, ability to stick with the run flats if you wish.
Don't get me wrong, 3.73s are a great choice too, but you will give up some gas mileage, and with the runflats traction will be difficult when you get down on it. Highway driving will be a bit louder. Some claim that the increased engine noise at cruising is not that much of a problem with the 3.73s, but that, like most everything else is a matter of personal preference. I have headers, high flow cats, and Corsa Indys. They get loud at high RPMs.
The performance difference between 3.42s and 3.73s is not that great.
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Jan 11, 2005 at 02:43 AM.
Yes, same as above. mainly gas mileage i think, but if dont take out on a lot of trips then it isnt a big deal. I like being fast off the line if i need to be and gas isnt a concern for me
I am seriously wondering what the difference is with a 3:15 change to 3:42s would be.
I can honestly see that a nice change would be seen from 2:73s to 3:42s, but I have a 3:15 and wonder if this is going to a big enough gain for me to want to do, vice just moving up to 3:73s.
I respect everyone's opnion on this thread, because it is a huge matter of opnion.
That is bold here! I appreciate the honesty. I have been really considering the 3:73s and this will more than likely be my very next major mod. I think it will be the best bang for the buck and will give me a great reason to professionally tune too.
Anyone have REAL numbers to back up claims? 3.73s are going to be much more than 3.42s because there are so many 3.42s from M6 cars around. The A4 car I have now came with 3.42s that were added, but I would like to see some facts about the 3.73s and what difference they produce in a real comparason. Anyone?
The reason why is because 3.42s are arguably the best option for the A4 in our cars.
Excellent performance, won't kill your gas mileage, engine RPMs reasonable on highway cruising, ability to stick with the run flats if you wish.
Don't get me wrong, 3.73s are a great choice too, but you will give up some gas mileage, and with the runflats traction will be difficult when you get down on it. Highway driving will be a bit louder. Some claim that the increased engine noise at cruising is not that much of a problem with the 3.73s, but that, like most everything else is a matter of personal preference. I have headers, high flow cats, and Corsa Indys. They get loud at high RPMs.
The performance difference between 3.42s and 3.73s is not that great.
Anyone have REAL numbers to back up claims? 3.73s are going to be much more than 3.42s because there are so many 3.42s from M6 cars around. The A4 car I have now came with 3.42s that were added, but I would like to see some facts about the 3.73s and what difference they produce in a real comparason. Anyone?
Feaver,
I doubt you'll find any kind of "numbers" 'cause if you're using dyno numbers, you'll get the opposite answer since it seems that guys that have steeper gears get lower dyno numbers than those with the same mods and lower gears.
If you're using 1/4 mile numbers, that's too ambiguous since I doubt there's alot of cars that are identical in mods with nothing more than different gears. And then obviously driving comes into play.
either is fine - unless one has small genitalia. Then you need to make up ground quickly by calling others inadequate.
MPH1972; if you plan on keeping run-flats on your C5, then the 3.42 is well matched to EMT type tires. And that is why I made that same step (3.15 to 3.42).
If I was willing to go to conventional tires - I probably would of gone the 3.73 route.
I think most of the responses here provide good info..let me just add a few reminder for those of you thinking of upgrading gears.
1st - it is a great idea and mod if you make the right selection for your driving application (track, street or both)
keep in mind that you will have to have your computer re-programmed with LS1 edit, or Predator/Hypertech etc... to adjust your shift points and speedo..(for A4 guys)this will cost extra.
If you have a 273, I would upgrade at least to a 342..anything less and it's not worth it. If you have a 315, I would go with maybe 390's or at least 373... 315 to 342 is not worth the $$$ not a big enough jump.
If you go 410's you might as well get new, bigger tires cuz youre gonna need em with that stout a gear