Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech

Ugly valentine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #41  
Joe Diver's Avatar
Joe Diver
CF Enhanced Member
Supporting Lifetime Gold
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
From: Section 326 Row A!! Finally. Go STARS!!
Cruise-In VI Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06
Default

You won't go wrong with either the X50 or V1. It's all about personal taste, affordability, and what you want from your detector. Just remeber that with 2 antenna's, the V1 is a radar locator, not just a detector.

Here's something nobody mentions much, so maybe it's only important to me, but it's a biggie and is THE difference to me:

Those arrows are HUGE and glow BRIGHT red. When I have the top off, radio jammin, and I'm cruisin, that get's my attention. The Bel985 I had (now in the Jeep) had the same display style that the 8500 has, blue or red, doesn't matter...but there was nothing on it that caught my eye in situations where I can't hear it. After a while, you just don't notice. With the V1, when those arrows light up, you see em.

I'm also very used to the arrows pointing out the source. When my Bel goes off in the Jeep, I find myself looking around....where is it? That doesn't happen in the vette with the V1.

The 8500 is a fine unit and depending on what you want out of your equipment, it's a very good choice too.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 11:59 AM
  #42  
JChrisF's Avatar
JChrisF
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Bada bing bada bling FL
Default

I've always wanted to use this smilie and now I can:

I just ordered the V1... should be here today and I can't wait.. then I'll be able to chime in... just wanted to use the smilie

Last edited by JChrisF; Jan 14, 2005 at 12:13 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 01:51 PM
  #43  
EG@EnglandGreen's Avatar
0EG@EnglandGreen
Supporting Tuner
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 51,896
Likes: 39
From: ================== Houston, Texas www.englandgreen.com ================== Necessary Evil™ __________
CI 6-7-8-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14
Default

SpongeVette, you're not usually so aggressive... jeez, - it's a Radar Detector not the end of the world.

Phew. Easy big guy...

Peace

EG
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 02:17 PM
  #44  
Rob'sC5's Avatar
Rob'sC5
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,494
Likes: 0
From: McKinney Tx
Cruise-In V Veteran
St. Jude's Donor '05
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Diver
You won't go wrong with either the X50 or V1. It's all about personal taste, affordability, and what you want from your detector. Just remeber that with 2 antenna's, the V1 is a radar locator, not just a detector.

Here's something nobody mentions much, so maybe it's only important to me, but it's a biggie and is THE difference to me:

Those arrows are HUGE and glow BRIGHT red. When I have the top off, radio jammin, and I'm cruisin, that get's my attention. The Bel985 I had (now in the Jeep) had the same display style that the 8500 has, blue or red, doesn't matter...but there was nothing on it that caught my eye in situations where I can't hear it. After a while, you just don't notice. With the V1, when those arrows light up, you see em.

I'm also very used to the arrows pointing out the source. When my Bel goes off in the Jeep, I find myself looking around....where is it? That doesn't happen in the vette with the V1.

The 8500 is a fine unit and depending on what you want out of your equipment, it's a very good choice too.

Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 02:46 PM
  #45  
WaWaTuSi's Avatar
WaWaTuSi
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge NJ
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
disable X band !!??

F I L T E R I T !!!

I use mine in that small L mode. Still shows X band but starts all but the strongest signals in the quiet mode... Works great!


Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #46  
Sponge Vette's Avatar
Sponge Vette
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,887
Likes: 2
From: Macomb MI
St. Jude Contributor
Default

Originally Posted by EnglandGreen
SpongeVette, you're not usually so aggressive... jeez, - it's a Radar Detector not the end of the world.

Phew. Easy big guy...

Peace

EG
I know Sorry, had to let a little steam out.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #47  
RaDaRkInG's Avatar
RaDaRkInG
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: LA Cali
Default

Originally Posted by steve8
I hate to think of what I am starting, but how ugly is the valentine vs the escort 8500. I know people have referrred to it as a toaster and I have to say I agree. I have not seen one in person in a long time. The look might actually sway me to the escort. Any comments?
Thanks.
Steve
The X50 is plastic, silver, longer than V1, higher than V1, weighs more than V1, only 1 antenna and 2-3 miles behind in rear Ka band detection, with a dumbcord that has nothing useful to say, and less resale value than the V1.

The V1 is magnesium, black, shorter than X50, not as high as X50, weighs less than X50, 2 antennas with arrows, beats X50 by 2-3 miles in rear Ka band detection, and has a true concealed display with real information you can put anywhere in your car you want, and it keeps it value like platinum.

The V1 is wider than the X50 but not by as much as the X50 is longer than the V1. I will take a wider detector all day long that has 2 eyes with depth perception compared to a plastic cyclops with no arrows.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:51 PM
  #48  
JChrisF's Avatar
JChrisF
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Bada bing bada bling FL
Default

Just got my V1... I think it looks nice
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 05:48 PM
  #49  
Fastgenious's Avatar
Fastgenious
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Default

I plan on buying a new detector next week and I have ruled out the V1. Most of the new tests in the last year has rated the V1 3rd or lower. I am looking at the Escort 8500 X50 red/blue and the Bel XR65 Pro(I think Escort owns Beltronics) which has tested very well against the V1 and the 8500 X50. The new tests also show that we all are pretty screwed when it comes to laser unless you have a hidden lasar/blocker detector installed in addition to your windshield mounted V1, Bel or Escort... I am leaning towards the Bel XR65 Pro. Just want to try something different.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 06:44 PM
  #50  
cjlaw73's Avatar
cjlaw73
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,358
Likes: 1
From: Medford NJ
Default

My V1 is somewhere in transit....c'mon UPS!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #51  
JChrisF's Avatar
JChrisF
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Bada bing bada bling FL
Default

Originally Posted by cjlaw73
My V1 is somewhere in transit....c'mon UPS!!!!
Can't believe I got mine first.. you should have ordered next day air. It's coming from Cinn. Ohio btw.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 07:28 PM
  #52  
Frizzle86's Avatar
Frizzle86
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,195
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia PA
Default

Originally Posted by Fastgenious
I plan on buying a new detector next week and I have ruled out the V1. Most of the new tests in the last year has rated the V1 3rd or lower. I am looking at the Escort 8500 X50 red/blue and the Bel XR65 Pro(I think Escort owns Beltronics) which has tested very well against the V1 and the 8500 X50. The new tests also show that we all are pretty screwed when it comes to laser unless you have a hidden lasar/blocker detector installed in addition to your windshield mounted V1, Bel or Escort... I am leaning towards the Bel XR65 Pro. Just want to try something different.

Could u post the link or articles that these results were found? I would like to read it.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #53  
Shylor's Avatar
Shylor
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,984
Likes: 0
From: Central Coast CA
Default

Wouldn't it be great if these things had antennas you could place in the front and rear of your car. Then you could totally conceal the base unit, while using a remote for hits.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #54  
EG@EnglandGreen's Avatar
0EG@EnglandGreen
Supporting Tuner
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 51,896
Likes: 39
From: ================== Houston, Texas www.englandgreen.com ================== Necessary Evil™ __________
CI 6-7-8-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14
Default

Originally Posted by Shylor
Wouldn't it be great if these things had antennas you could place in the front and rear of your car. Then you could totally conceal the base unit, while using a remote for hits.
There are units like that - They work well and Escort and others make them; they are big $$$.

Only one problem... they are too low. By the time you get a warning, you are probably nailed, unless you live in a big sky state with no hills etc.

Ideally, if you could get your detector up about 6 feet above your car for radar and about 1000 feet in front of your car for laser, you'll be all set.

EG

Last edited by EG@EnglandGreen; Jan 14, 2005 at 10:40 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 09:27 PM
  #55  
JChrisF's Avatar
JChrisF
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Bada bing bada bling FL
Default

V1 saved my butt twice in 1st hour of use. Yes, I had to cruise around and test it out since it didn't arrive until 4:30pm. The cops were everywhere tonight. I pulled beside a Rustang GT (and wouldn't you know it... a cute girl was driving) and got hit in the back with radar... good thing we weren't moving too fast. She didn't have radar and sped up but I got behind her for the block

5 miles down the road and it's telling me two bogeys in front. I stop at a light and cruiser pulls up in front... he's got his radar on while cruising... the other cruiser was at the top of the hill. I've never seen so many cops around here. I think this is the first weekend the college kids at Stetson are back... must be why. Thanks V1!
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 10:37 PM
  #56  
Cocked and Locked's Avatar
Cocked and Locked
Race Director
15 Year Member
St. Jude 10 Year Donor
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 14,372
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis IN
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17
Default

Originally Posted by Frizzle86
Could u post the link or articles that these results were found? I would like to read it.
RadarBusters
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #57  
RogueVette's Avatar
RogueVette
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 0
From: TurtleCreek Twp Ohio
Cruise-In III Veteran
Default

Originally Posted by Frizzle86
Could u post the link or articles that these results were found? I would like to read it.

ask and you shall recieve.

Radar Busters test lab

and for RaDaRiDiOt I can certainly live with having less rear radar notice with the 8500 I usually only worry about whats in front of me at the speeds I travel a Cop 3 miles behind me is not going to get a reading anyway and unless he's already coming after me he's not going to catch up anyway.

This review is also on the radar busters site but was performed with the Teaxs state police

State police testing

That is the test that convinced my brother to buy the Blinder laser jammer (and me now as well)and if you read it you will see that they as well as I in my own personal tests have found the 8500 performs better over a hill and unlike RaDaRiDiOt I am very concerned about that type of thing. Pre warning about what coming at me is a tiny bit more important than what's coming up from behind. Also as you'll see they three top detectors perform pretty damn well and similar to each other with the V1 picking up flat land radar a bit sooner in X and K and the 8500 picking up flat Ka better. It just reiterates they are both fantastic detectors (hopefully we all can agree on that) but one is slightly better at some stuff then others. It comes down to your driving area and taste/price. I don't regret spending $399 on the V1 or $299 on the 8500 they have both served me well.

Originally Posted by RaDaRkInG/IdIoT
The X50 is plastic, silver, longer than V1, higher than V1, weighs more than V1, only 1 antenna and 2-3 miles behind in rear Ka band detection, with a dumbcord that has nothing useful to say, and less resale value than the V1.
the "dumb" cord is a very usefull tool if you ever by chance are looking at the radio/Climate control/Ashtray(N20 switches) and for muting without reaching across the windshield if you have your detector mounted in the best spot low on the windshield. Sometimes it's just not good to be the king.....
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Ugly valentine?

Old Jan 15, 2005 | 01:17 AM
  #58  
RaDaRkInG's Avatar
RaDaRkInG
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: LA Cali
Default

http://www.policeandsecuritynews.com...tionalTgtg.htm

Summary of 2003 SML test by Carl Fors:

"When officers were told to quick trigger (approximately one second) their radar guns against the Escort 8500, it did not see, nor report, the use of Stalker’s ATR, Stalker Basic, Kustom Directional Golden Eagle, Kustom Talon, and Kustom Falcon. The 8500 did not see any MPH POP transmissions."

http://www.radar.co.nz/nz/report1.html

Summary of testing by company that has been doing this for 23 years

NEWS:
END of an era! R.I.P Escort 8500
Well, there has been a bit of a rush this past month, for the Escort 8500. The New X50 - 8500 is really just a BEL 995/RX65 in a different housing. Overall performance of the X50 is nothing like the current Escort 8500. Less Ka camera performance, compared to the earlier Escort 8500. The X50 shares 95% the same hardware and software of the BEL Vector 995/RX65.
This now puts the Valentine 1/CENZ in a league of its own.
Beware of performance claims for the new X50-8500, based on tests that were carried out on earlier 8500.
The X50 is not the same detector.!!

http://www.epinions.com/content_154879364740

Summary of one persons review

BUT BY FAR the biggest problem with the 8500 is that it is not durable. So far mine has been back to the factory 2 times and its needs to go back again now. The first time it lost its K and KA detection ability, fortunately I had a few days of warranty period left. The warranty department was very nice and friendly. Unfortunately, they did not properly repair the unit and it broke again within 45 days. Apparently the problem was a weak antenna connection, which is rather shameful considering that I treat my radar detector with kid gloves.

The detector started failing again this summer. For a few days during the hottest part of the summer the detector gave unrelenting continuous KA band alerts, when it cooled the problem went away. Then, over the labor day week end, at about 450 miles into a 500 mile journey it started acting up again on KA mode. Unlike last time, this time the detector realized it had a problem and cycled in and out of calibration mode 3 times before it shut down and displayed the ‘service required’ display, it indicated a "cal 3 error"

The reason why Mike Valentine will get my money every time
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 01:39 AM
  #59  
RaDaRkInG's Avatar
RaDaRkInG
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: LA Cali
Default Hey AqUaWoMaN

2003 SML test,

There is a 3 degree hill at 2.2 miles from the base vehicle. We wanted to see if detectors gave any warning as they approached the radar guns from over the hill at 2.2 miles. At 2.2 miles there is very little radar gun signal to detect as we learned from our discussion of the "Inverse Square Rule." Remember 2.1 miles is still seven times the normal targeting range of a radar gun using The 1/4th Mile Rule

Results:

Valentine One X band 3.3 miles, K band 2.6 miles, Ka band 2.3 miles

Passport 8500 X band 2.2 miles, K band 2.5 miles, Ka band 2.3 miles

Their summary:

The results clearly show the Valentine One gave advanced warning on all bands before the hill at 2.2 miles on all bands.

I also find it interesting in the 2004 SML test that the X50 can't pick up K band at 2.5 miles like it could in the 2003 SML test. Also, the V1 can't pick up X or K band at 2.5 miles in the 2004 SML test like it could in the 2003 SML test.

I also wonder why the RX65 can't pick up X, K, or Ka at 2.5 miles over the hill according to SML when the X50 shares 95% of the same hardware and software as the RX65.

There are some weird anomalies with the 2003 SML and 2004 SML test.

In 2003 SML said, "Please do not ask us to recommend a detector. We won't! Please don't ask us to compare this year's models to last year's. We do not recommend specific detectors, nor do we sell them."

In 2004 SML changed their mind and said, "The “Top Dog” of radar detectors in the Over $300.00 price category goes to Escort’s X50 for the following reasons. It was the only detector to report constant on and instant on radar over the hill at the 2 1/2 mile cone. It consistently alerted to MPH’s Bee III POP mode. It was one of only two of the six detectors tested to be invisible to the new Spectre III RDD and it tied in the Long Ranger test alerting at an astounding eleven miles from the radar guns. The X50 also lends itself easily to interfacing with motorcycle defense systems with external audio."

Gee, I thought they didn't recommend radar detectors. I guess they have to take the "IMPARTIAL FIELD TESTING AUTHORITY" from underneath their name for next years test and replace it with "Craig Peterson's Top Dog Radar Detector Competition brought to you by Escort and Bel"

Last edited by RaDaRkInG; Jan 16, 2005 at 05:45 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 08:17 AM
  #60  
talon90's Avatar
talon90
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,617
Likes: 167
Tech Contributor
Cruise-In 11 Veteran
NCM Ambassador
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'10
Default

Originally Posted by KernelDee
Well, the radar busters site certainly didn't rank the V1 third based on performance....

The testing also showed that the Bel RX65 and the Escort 8500 X50 performed as well, and in some cases better then the more expensive Valentine 1 radar detector.
I also have a problem in the way this "test" represents the X, K and, Ka results graphically. The Bel RX65 and Escort X50 each received X band at 4.5 miles the V1 tested to receive it .1 miles sooner at 4.6...but the graph bars shows them equal. When you move on the K and Ka band test results graph all three were tested to 4.3 miles yet the V1's results are shown with one bar less on the graph so that someone making a quick scan of the results would rate the other two higher....to me, this is It is a simple matter of graphsmanship designed to draw the reader to a conclusion of the author's choosing. Lastly, bear in mind that this test is published on a site that is a reseller of radar detectors. The only reason that they lower the rating of the V1 is due its higher price which does affect the "value" to the consumer.

We do not sell the Valentine 1, however as many people consider this radar detector the bench mark of radar detectors we do test it. The Valentine 1 is an excellent unit with excellent range and filtering. The big drawback in our opinion is the price as it costs $399.00 and does not detect POP3 radar guns at all! In our testing, the Escort 8500 outperformed the Valentine 1 in range and filtering. Upgradable by Valentine
With that said, I don't think you will go wrong with any of these top units. I prefer the V1, YMMV. The other units may in fact be a better value since they are generally priced lower and have similar results. I liked the design of the V1 with the arrows so that's what I bought.

Paul

Last edited by talon90; Jan 15, 2005 at 08:33 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE