Vararam vs. Blackwing
With all due respect, all CAI is not created the same. Reducing inlet air temperature is very important, but the airflow path is at least just as important. As fluid dynamics suggests, our engineers found that the most direct path generates the least turbulence and flow restriction, ultimately providing more available air mass to the engine. Simplifying the flow path, maximizing radii around bends, and eliminating the restrictive "air bridge" were all primary objectives when the Honker was designed for the C5. In addition, filter element design and ease of maintenance were also addressed in the Honker's development.
Again I appreciate your opinion, but many of us have spent a lot more than $490 to bolt-on 18 hp (That's what our dyno testing revealed on a stock LS1, SAE-corrected). Personally, I happen to think that $490 for 18 hp is an excellent dollars to horsepower ratio.
Has anyone done a Vararam vs. Honker test ? Very Interested to know the results of that one.
Does LG sell them and if so is this the ram air system that hooks up to the two fog light holes or something like that? JamesI just checked the LG website and I did infact see that they sell the Varram ram air system. Does anyone else have documented track times from before and after installation. I am more concerned about increase in MPH than a drop in ET, as the previous refers to HP generated whereas the latter is just a function of hooking up the tires. Thanks, James
One question that I've wondered about however - is the air around the shroud opening where the Honker feeds hotter than say the air in front of the bumper when you are sitting in traffic or staging at the track. My first thought is that it would be due to the vicinity of the radiator but that's just a thought and may be way off. Any information on this (testing with IAT's)?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
One question that I've wondered about however - is the air around the shroud opening where the Honker feeds hotter than say the air in front of the bumper when you are sitting in traffic or staging at the track. My first thought is that it would be due to the vicinity of the radiator but that's just a thought and may be way off. Any information on this (testing with IAT's)?
Regarding air temperature at the bumper vs. at the Honker inlet, if coolant temperature is high enough to have an effect on ambient air in front of the radiator, then the cooling fans have already switched on. When the fans are on, fresh air is being drawn in from "outside" of the car to the area in front of and through the radiator.
Also, GM did a great job of configuring the front end such that the radiator is supplied with ambient air as soon as the car starts to move, with or without the fans operating. The faster the car's speed, the more air is dircted into this area. We performed tests monitoring pressure inside the Honker, just in front of the MAFS. With all other variables controlled, we found that the air pressure inside the Honker duct is directly proportional to vehicle speed, unlike the OEM piece that gets inlet air from under the hood. We published test results that supported this for the C6 Z06, the report is copied in our web site: Honker Z06 test report
Regarding air temperature at the bumper vs. at the Honker inlet, if coolant temperature is high enough to have an effect on ambient air in front of the radiator, then the cooling fans have already switched on. When the fans are on, fresh air is being drawn in from "outside" of the car to the area in front of and through the radiator.
1. The air being drawn in is cooler through the Vararam then the Honker.
2. The Vararam does have more curves and bends then the Honker.
3. No comparison of filters, the Honker is much better.
4. No comparison of manufacturing quality, Honker wins hands down.
5. The Vararam is almost half the price of the Honker.
Considering these conclusions, The Vararam will outsell the Honker by a huge margin. It accomplishes all the performance enhancements racers are looking for, better then the Honker.
Thanks,
Clayton from Las Vegas
OK, flame away
Regarding air temperature at the bumper vs. at the Honker inlet, if coolant temperature is high enough to have an effect on ambient air in front of the radiator, then the cooling fans have already switched on. When the fans are on, fresh air is being drawn in from "outside" of the car to the area in front of and through the radiator.
Also, GM did a great job of configuring the front end such that the radiator is supplied with ambient air as soon as the car starts to move, with or without the fans operating. The faster the car's speed, the more air is dircted into this area. We performed tests monitoring pressure inside the Honker, just in front of the MAFS. With all other variables controlled, we found that the air pressure inside the Honker duct is directly proportional to vehicle speed, unlike the OEM piece that gets inlet air from under the hood. We published test results that supported this for the C6 Z06, the report is copied in our web site: Honker Z06 test report
Improve the Blackwing air flow by cutting out the back of the foglights and install ZO6 screens. My $.02
If anyone already has a Blackwing or non-Vararam system, you could also get some laundry dryer ducting and route it from the Z-screens right into the air filter.
Regarding the price difference, the C5 Honker eliminates the air bridge.
High performance air bridges or "power ducts" are priced from $150 to $300, depending on material and configuration.
1. The air being drawn in is cooler through the Vararam then the Honker.
2. The Vararam does have more curves and bends then the Honker.
3. No comparison of filters, the Honker is much better.
4. No comparison of manufacturing quality, Honker wins hands down.
5. The Vararam is almost half the price of the Honker.
Considering these conclusions, The Vararam will outsell the Honker by a huge margin. It accomplishes all the performance enhancements racers are looking for, better then the Honker.
Thanks,
Clayton from Las Vegas
OK, flame away
Last edited by Nithros; Mar 16, 2006 at 07:34 AM.
With an '03 Z06 engine, we recorded an increase of 20.8 bhp (SAE-corrected), on the engine dyno. The only change was installing a production Honker.














