When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
There was no before dyno done, which I thought there would be.
What do you mean dot to dot?
From what I could tell, traction hasnt been the problem
Look on LS1howto.com on the cam installation in an LS1. It will have pictures and better explain things for you. The cam dot has to be perfectly lined up with the crank dot. If they aren't it could cause some serious power loss.
Look on LS1howto.com on the cam installation in an LS1. It will have pictures and better explain things for you. The cam dot has to be perfectly lined up with the crank dot. If they aren't it could cause some serious power loss.
I used ls1howto as my guide. I editied my original post to say that they were spot on
Last edited by BrianG01; Jul 14, 2007 at 07:52 PM.
It may all be in my mind now, but it seemed like it pulled harder before the tune. The tune deffinately made it more driveable and removed the poor idling
its not a big cam, but i did a 224/224 and got 411 rwhp...to tell if its yoru driving or a malfunction, we need to see the dyno graph of the set up you have now. a "professional" dyno tune dosnt always mean "professional"
That is actually a pretty big cam for 347. With that cam and a tune, I would expect to see 20 to 25 rwhp.
Keith
No it's a very small cam. I'm running a 230/232 .598/.585 cam and that is probably considered medium to large. We really need to see some slips. He gained 2mph, so there is power being made. My guess is that his 60' times are about .1 slower with the cam, which accounts for this. A tenth off your 60' time is worth .15-.2 at the end.
ummmm yeah, a 219/228 is not a big cam. its a baby one and the other guy was right, dont expect big gains. i think a z06 cam is 216 something something.
If you went through the hastle of doing a cam swap why did you not go bigger in the first place? did you do your research? There are alot of very streetable cams out there... I would have done a 228 or 232 maybe a MS4 (239/242, .649"/.609") lol been there done that!
Last edited by kornfreak_401; Jul 16, 2007 at 12:32 PM.
No it's a very small cam. I'm running a 230/232 .598/.585 cam and that is probably considered medium to large. We really need to see some slips. He gained 2mph, so there is power being made. My guess is that his 60' times are about .1 slower with the cam, which accounts for this. A tenth off your 60' time is worth .15-.2 at the end.
i know everyone says, the track is where it shows, but seriously, it woudl have to be the same run, same launch,conditions, tire, shift point, etc...to really tell. I say you need a dyno graph, thats the real numbers, and also the A/F ratio and A/F curve