When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have believed ever since getting my 6spd C5 that the drive train power loss was 15 percent. Recently some friends have told me that it's 13 percent. While I'm sure the number is fairly fluid, what would be most accurate?
I see many folks on here speaking about a 15% powertrain loss, but two different tuners told me its a conservative 12%.
I'm curious to find out the true percentage, from someone that is considered an authority on the topic....and not a few guys trying to convince themselves they have more power than they do.
I see many folks on here speaking about a 15% powertrain loss, but two different tuners told me its a conservative 12%.
I'm curious to find out the true percentage, from someone that is considered an authority on the topic....and not a few guys trying to convince themselves they have more power than they do.
That is exactly my sticking point. I have backed into my flywheel horsepower number, which is prominently dislayed on my show card, using the 15pct rule and I'd like to be showing a fairly accurate number.
Its not necessarily a set amount. It can be different based on wheels, brakes, shafts, fluids, etc.
And, to complicate it even more, its probably not even a percentage.
A 6 speed may take as little as 12 percent to turn behind a 400 hp motor, but I have a hard time believing it would take 120 hp to turn behind a 1000 hp engine.
Thats using an extreme, but you get the idea. Alot of experienced guys are of the belief that they take a certain percentage up to a point.
I see many folks on here speaking about a 15% powertrain loss, but two different tuners told me its a conservative 12%.
I'm curious to find out the true percentage, from someone that is considered an authority on the topic....and not a few guys trying to convince themselves they have more power than they do.
and some tuners say the Mustang dyno provides the more accurate HP reading over the Dynojet. But the Dynojet has the higher bench racing numbers
and some tuners say the Mustang dyno provides the more accurate HP reading over the Dynojet. But the Dynojet has the higher bench racing numbers
Go figure
But the Mustangs have operator entered correction factors which leave them open for inaccurate or tampered results. You can actually make them read higher (than a dynojet), which has been the topic of some pretty heated debates on ls1tech.
But the Mustangs have operator entered correction factors which leave them open for inaccurate or tampered results. You can actually make them read higher (than a dynojet), which has been the topic of some pretty heated debates on ls1tech.
Oh Yes I have read those too. : : Very heated.
so the end result and many ppls opinions, a DYNO is a tuning Device only, nothing more.
for a stock C5, I've always heard 15% for manual tranny, and 17% for automatic. I dont' remember where those figures came from - or their validity... but that's what I've always read.
Besides, drive-on car dynos are not intended to spec an engine... they're used to verify before/after mod gains.
Originally Posted by FRCTony
The most accurate HP measurement is trap speed.
ain't that teh truth
Last edited by Mike Mercury; Aug 13, 2007 at 11:13 AM.