When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I would say it's more on the smaller side but then again I have a cam in the 238/242 range. If your trying to figure out if drivability would be effected, you should retain stock-like drivability with that cam with a slight lope. If you want a little comparison to the cam you mentioned, the cam in your car now is a 204/218 551/541 117.5lsa .
I suggest you read this to get a better understanding of cams and what the numbers all mean.
I would say it is in the middle range--there are many cams availiable that have less duration and more LSA than that--As mentioned above--i'd be sure about the "reverse split " type as well--unless you were specifically recc. this cam by your builder--i would pick a more conventional type--Also--if you are in an Emisions state that uses the snifter test be careful when going above .224/.224 with a 114 LSA--it will be borderline in passing
Here is my set up. I am trying to get to the 450+. I don't know if I want a ported fast intake, or to put a bigger cam in...
I love the set up, but would love to get a little more out of it.
429 rwhp SI007 cam 228/222 .588, .581 lift 114.5 LSA , RGR Stage 1 LS6/243's, ( STOCK VALVE ), Comp 918's, Comp Pushrods, Taylor wires, ARP head bolts, SLP Crank Pulley , Port Matched LS6 intake, Raptor XXL and air bridge, SW LT's with no cats, B&B prt catback, Delphi 38# inj. , 3.90 gear (stock rear),