C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Do Electric Superchargers Work?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 03:03 PM
  #21  
supergee's Avatar
supergee
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Lehighton PA
Default

Originally Posted by cruisemon
Old school, fear of technoloy, whatever is a smokescreen. Here's the reality - unless you've found a way to change the laws of physics, a certain amount of power is needed to move a given volume of air at a specified rate. The air doesn't know where that power comes from and the physics doesn't care. If it takes 40 hp to belt drive a blower to mover enough air to provide 7 psi boost to a 5.7 L engine, it will take a closely simiar amount of electrical power to do it as well. Forty horsepower is about 30 KW or 30,000 watts. A typical automobile puts out about 14 volts, but for simplicity, let's say it puts out 15vdc. That means we need on 2,000 amps from our alternator to power our electric blower. I've never seen one, but let's suppose there is a 200 amp alternator available. We'll only need TEN of them to drive our electric supercharger, plus the standard alternator to drive the other accessories. The alternator is not 100% efficient so it will take more than the equivalent of 40 hp to drive the alternators.

Cliff Notes - Buy some of those "R" decals for your car. The horsepower gain is about the same as the "electric supercharger" and costs less. If you still want to spend some money, buy one of the "modules" for $22 that tricks the IAT into thinking it's still seeing cold air. You'll go faster because you wallet is lighter.

Need more? Buy TWO of the gas line magnets, a couple of the "water vapor injectors" that suck PCV bleed air through a jug of water to "humidify that power robbing bone dry air". It reduces spark knock, improves economy, increases power, reduces emissioins, stops global warming and assures peace and prosperity for all mankind.

Charlie

This man is correct.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #22  
ArKay99's Avatar
ArKay99
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 2
From: Cape Coral FL
Default

What about Mr. Fusion? It uses garbage for fuel and generates 6.2 gigawatts of power.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #23  
AVB's Avatar
AVB
Safety Car
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,932
Likes: 8
From: Hayward California
Default

Originally Posted by BlackZ06
Uhhhhh .... with the stock electrical system ... of course there is a parasitic loss. Where do you think the electricity comes from in a car??? The battery is a storage device, the device that MAKES the electricity is the alternator (generator on much older cars).

If you attach a device to the car that needs X amount of amps to drive it, the alternator IMMEDIATELY increases its load on the engine to generate that X amperage. And that load is a parasitic loss, it takes HP to make the electricity.

Maybe if you added a whole bunch of batteries to the car that only powered this "turbo" and re-charged them only by, say, plugging them into a charger when you get home ..... then you might argue that there is no loss .... though I would argue the added weight of the batteries, this "turbo" unit, etc, undoubtably would waste more power than one of these POS units could generate in its makers wildest wet dreams.


I stand corrected... at the point of getting that much power from batteries it may as well tie in to the flywheel and be called a hybrid
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #24  
sugarwolf's Avatar
sugarwolf
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 1
From: Wa
Default

Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #25  
sxeC7's Avatar
sxeC7
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,269
Likes: 50
From: Dallas Texas
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'09-'10
Default

Lets face it the only free supercharging is the exhaust driven turbocharger that utilizes the energy from expanding hot gases to spin the turbine wheel. The alternative would be to power a compressor when needed with a small engine like a two stroke Rotax.

The unit in the above pix looks like a HVAC fan and motor that would probably be a restriction at WOT.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #26  
lionelhutz's Avatar
lionelhutz
Race Director
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,150
Likes: 890
From: South Western Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by middlebrookgt
Just remember that a belt-driven supercharger parasitically takes about 10% of engine output to run, so an electric should have a motor in the 30-40 hp range to do what it claims
and if you figure out that 30hp will require at least 1600A @ 14VDC that makes getting the necessary power impossible.

So, any claims as to the operation of these things is complete

Peter
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #27  
bayarea's Avatar
bayarea
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 1
From: V town california
Default

Originally Posted by jdmvette
about as well as this:

haha is that the fukin flowbee!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 08:06 PM
  #28  
BlackZ06's Avatar
BlackZ06
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,933
Likes: 30
From: San Rafael CA
Default

The Flowbee RULES .... anyone else has no idea how it has improved my life as a bald guy .....

Last edited by BlackZ06; Feb 11, 2008 at 07:40 AM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #29  
BlackZ06's Avatar
BlackZ06
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,933
Likes: 30
From: San Rafael CA
Default

Originally Posted by bayarea
haha is that the fukin flowbee!
Absolutely !!!!!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #30  
nj02vette's Avatar
nj02vette
Race Director
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 21
From: Marlton. Increasing performance one speeding ticket at a time! NJ
Default

Originally Posted by cruisemon
Old school, fear of technoloy, whatever is a smokescreen. Here's the reality - unless you've found a way to change the laws of physics, a certain amount of power is needed to move a given volume of air at a specified rate. The air doesn't know where that power comes from and the physics doesn't care. If it takes 40 hp to belt drive a blower to mover enough air to provide 7 psi boost to a 5.7 L engine, it will take a closely simiar amount of electrical power to do it as well. Forty horsepower is about 30 KW or 30,000 watts. A typical automobile puts out about 14 volts, but for simplicity, let's say it puts out 15vdc. That means we need on 2,000 amps from our alternator to power our electric blower. I've never seen one, but let's suppose there is a 200 amp alternator available. We'll only need TEN of them to drive our electric supercharger, plus the standard alternator to drive the other accessories. The alternator is not 100% efficient so it will take more than the equivalent of 40 hp to drive the alternators.

Cliff Notes - Buy some of those "R" decals for your car. The horsepower gain is about the same as the "electric supercharger" and costs less. If you still want to spend some money, buy one of the "modules" for $22 that tricks the IAT into thinking it's still seeing cold air. You'll go faster because you wallet is lighter.

Need more? Buy TWO of the gas line magnets, a couple of the "water vapor injectors" that suck PCV bleed air through a jug of water to "humidify that power robbing bone dry air". It reduces spark knock, improves economy, increases power, reduces emissioins, stops global warming and assures peace and prosperity for all mankind.

Charlie
I was about to type the same explanation, but you summed it up nicer than I could.
You just can't get enough power, plain and simple.

Now, I've worked with blowers that put out 1200-1500CFM and use maybe 50Watts. That's more than our engines need at full throttle 6500 RPM (for a stock 346 that's a max of 650CFM). So on the first glance, looks like those blowers flow more than we need. Problem is pressure. To get something that can handle the amount of backpressure necessary requires something that is much more powerful.

From a technological perspective, it can't work.
From a common sense perspective, something so great yet no one uses it, is just a scam.

But I would still like to buy one. I'll ask them to send me some to Nigeria. In return, they can keep the excess money from that money order. Nothing as satisfactory as scamming a scammer.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #31  
mcgilles's Avatar
mcgilles
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 7
From: Iowa
Default


I was going to post just the same. fact of the matter is: 30 hp = 22,370.9961 watts; 40 hp = 29,827.9949 watts. either way, just no way to generate that kind of power in a car.

even if you could, a 30-40hp motor would be the size of your LS1, that would require quite a hood modification. the inrush current on such a motor would difficult to deal with also. you would have to use a variable frequency drive to control the motor and allow it to change speeds with engine rpm. yet another very expensive piece of equipment.

no matter which direction you attempt to approach this method of supercharging...it just won't work.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #32  
99C5x's Avatar
99C5x
Racer
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX
Default Worms

Buddy I think you opened up a can of worms! I am sure you regret asking about this right about now-but someone was going to do it eventually. I personally think that if you are looking for more performance get it done right the first time. Also take note that if this item fell apart it would destroy your beautiful machine. Now everyone wants to get faster cheaper, but there are some things that just don't make 1 lick of sense!!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 12:09 AM
  #33  
bayarea's Avatar
bayarea
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 1
From: V town california
Default

Originally Posted by BlackZ06
Absolutely !!!!!
lol imma go cut all my hair with my new flobee
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 01:30 AM
  #34  
SteveDoten's Avatar
SteveDoten
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,276
Likes: 226
From: Farmington CT
Cruise-In VII Veteran
Default

ibtl
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #35  
peebee_c5's Avatar
peebee_c5
Instructor
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 210
Likes: 2
From: Elkins Park PA
Default

The GA Projects site posted above by sugarwolf seems to be a fairly truthful & authoritative source.... http://www.gaprojects.com/electricsuper/
They confirm that 13-20hp is a typical mechanical supercharger requirement, and admit that their electric supercharger project kit comes nowhere close to that nor is it intended to compete with a traditional supercharger. Their system apparently runs at 36 volts, they use 3 batteries in series to run and then rewire in parallel to recharge, which reduces the current requirements (and alternator demand). Their system is only intended for use in short bursts, not continuous (which will further reduce alternator demand). Their system is intended to provide boost at low engine speeds, but will apparently present a restriction at high engine speeds -- the intended purpose is to improve torque & response at low engine speeds, so this makes sense in that light.

They also refer to a Thomas Knight electric supercharger which apparently will go head-to-head against a mechanical supercharger. Presumably it costs more than $100.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 02:19 PM
  #36  
Mike Mercury's Avatar
Mike Mercury
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 54,204
Likes: 180
From: S.W. Ohio. . . . . . NRA Life Member
Default

Originally Posted by jdmvette
about as well as this:

aka: the suck-cut.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #37  
Mike Mercury's Avatar
Mike Mercury
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 54,204
Likes: 180
From: S.W. Ohio. . . . . . NRA Life Member
Default

Originally Posted by peebee_c5
Their system apparently runs at 36 volts, they use 3 batteries in series to run and then rewire in parallel to recharge...
so; how much extra power is needed just to lug those three batteries around? I imagine the system eats as much HP as it might generate.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Do Electric Superchargers Work?

Old Feb 12, 2008 | 05:24 AM
  #38  
KublaiKhan's Avatar
KublaiKhan
Intermediate
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default

Some people's kids...

Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 08:51 AM
  #39  
p_dubya's Avatar
p_dubya
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 208
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Default

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/produ...uct_id=7850222

Walmart sells a bunch of electric superchargers. This one is even anodized Red!!

Their prices ranges are 9.94 to 44.86 and HP gains of 50-60000 HP!!!
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #40  
Benpup's Avatar
Benpup
Race Director
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18,401
Likes: 3
From: Retired but working
Cruise-In VI Veteran
Default

Use the wives blowdryer and invest in 3 or 4 miles of extension cord. You'd be better off.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE