When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Old school, fear of technoloy, whatever is a smokescreen. Here's the reality - unless you've found a way to change the laws of physics, a certain amount of power is needed to move a given volume of air at a specified rate. The air doesn't know where that power comes from and the physics doesn't care. If it takes 40 hp to belt drive a blower to mover enough air to provide 7 psi boost to a 5.7 L engine, it will take a closely simiar amount of electrical power to do it as well. Forty horsepower is about 30 KW or 30,000 watts. A typical automobile puts out about 14 volts, but for simplicity, let's say it puts out 15vdc. That means we need on 2,000 amps from our alternator to power our electric blower. I've never seen one, but let's suppose there is a 200 amp alternator available. We'll only need TEN of them to drive our electric supercharger, plus the standard alternator to drive the other accessories. The alternator is not 100% efficient so it will take more than the equivalent of 40 hp to drive the alternators.
Cliff Notes - Buy some of those "R" decals for your car. The horsepower gain is about the same as the "electric supercharger" and costs less. If you still want to spend some money, buy one of the "modules" for $22 that tricks the IAT into thinking it's still seeing cold air. You'll go faster because you wallet is lighter.
Need more? Buy TWO of the gas line magnets, a couple of the "water vapor injectors" that suck PCV bleed air through a jug of water to "humidify that power robbing bone dry air". It reduces spark knock, improves economy, increases power, reduces emissioins, stops global warming and assures peace and prosperity for all mankind.
Uhhhhh .... with the stock electrical system ... of course there is a parasitic loss. Where do you think the electricity comes from in a car??? The battery is a storage device, the device that MAKES the electricity is the alternator (generator on much older cars).
If you attach a device to the car that needs X amount of amps to drive it, the alternator IMMEDIATELY increases its load on the engine to generate that X amperage. And that load is a parasitic loss, it takes HP to make the electricity.
Maybe if you added a whole bunch of batteries to the car that only powered this "turbo" and re-charged them only by, say, plugging them into a charger when you get home ..... then you might argue that there is no loss .... though I would argue the added weight of the batteries, this "turbo" unit, etc, undoubtably would waste more power than one of these POS units could generate in its makers wildest wet dreams.
I stand corrected... at the point of getting that much power from batteries it may as well tie in to the flywheel and be called a hybrid
Lets face it the only free supercharging is the exhaust driven turbocharger that utilizes the energy from expanding hot gases to spin the turbine wheel. The alternative would be to power a compressor when needed with a small engine like a two stroke Rotax.
The unit in the above pix looks like a HVAC fan and motor that would probably be a restriction at WOT.
Just remember that a belt-driven supercharger parasitically takes about 10% of engine output to run, so an electric should have a motor in the 30-40 hp range to do what it claims
and if you figure out that 30hp will require at least 1600A @ 14VDC that makes getting the necessary power impossible.
So, any claims as to the operation of these things is complete
From: Marlton. Increasing performance one speeding ticket at a time! NJ
Originally Posted by cruisemon
Old school, fear of technoloy, whatever is a smokescreen. Here's the reality - unless you've found a way to change the laws of physics, a certain amount of power is needed to move a given volume of air at a specified rate. The air doesn't know where that power comes from and the physics doesn't care. If it takes 40 hp to belt drive a blower to mover enough air to provide 7 psi boost to a 5.7 L engine, it will take a closely simiar amount of electrical power to do it as well. Forty horsepower is about 30 KW or 30,000 watts. A typical automobile puts out about 14 volts, but for simplicity, let's say it puts out 15vdc. That means we need on 2,000 amps from our alternator to power our electric blower. I've never seen one, but let's suppose there is a 200 amp alternator available. We'll only need TEN of them to drive our electric supercharger, plus the standard alternator to drive the other accessories. The alternator is not 100% efficient so it will take more than the equivalent of 40 hp to drive the alternators.
Cliff Notes - Buy some of those "R" decals for your car. The horsepower gain is about the same as the "electric supercharger" and costs less. If you still want to spend some money, buy one of the "modules" for $22 that tricks the IAT into thinking it's still seeing cold air. You'll go faster because you wallet is lighter.
Need more? Buy TWO of the gas line magnets, a couple of the "water vapor injectors" that suck PCV bleed air through a jug of water to "humidify that power robbing bone dry air". It reduces spark knock, improves economy, increases power, reduces emissioins, stops global warming and assures peace and prosperity for all mankind.
Charlie
I was about to type the same explanation, but you summed it up nicer than I could.
You just can't get enough power, plain and simple.
Now, I've worked with blowers that put out 1200-1500CFM and use maybe 50Watts. That's more than our engines need at full throttle 6500 RPM (for a stock 346 that's a max of 650CFM). So on the first glance, looks like those blowers flow more than we need. Problem is pressure. To get something that can handle the amount of backpressure necessary requires something that is much more powerful.
From a technological perspective, it can't work.
From a common sense perspective, something so great yet no one uses it, is just a scam.
But I would still like to buy one. I'll ask them to send me some to Nigeria. In return, they can keep the excess money from that money order. Nothing as satisfactory as scamming a scammer.
I was going to post just the same. fact of the matter is: 30 hp = 22,370.9961 watts; 40 hp = 29,827.9949 watts. either way, just no way to generate that kind of power in a car.
even if you could, a 30-40hp motor would be the size of your LS1, that would require quite a hood modification. the inrush current on such a motor would difficult to deal with also. you would have to use a variable frequency drive to control the motor and allow it to change speeds with engine rpm. yet another very expensive piece of equipment.
no matter which direction you attempt to approach this method of supercharging...it just won't work.
Buddy I think you opened up a can of worms! I am sure you regret asking about this right about now-but someone was going to do it eventually. I personally think that if you are looking for more performance get it done right the first time. Also take note that if this item fell apart it would destroy your beautiful machine. Now everyone wants to get faster cheaper, but there are some things that just don't make 1 lick of sense!!
The GA Projects site posted above by sugarwolf seems to be a fairly truthful & authoritative source.... http://www.gaprojects.com/electricsuper/
They confirm that 13-20hp is a typical mechanical supercharger requirement, and admit that their electric supercharger project kit comes nowhere close to that nor is it intended to compete with a traditional supercharger. Their system apparently runs at 36 volts, they use 3 batteries in series to run and then rewire in parallel to recharge, which reduces the current requirements (and alternator demand). Their system is only intended for use in short bursts, not continuous (which will further reduce alternator demand). Their system is intended to provide boost at low engine speeds, but will apparently present a restriction at high engine speeds -- the intended purpose is to improve torque & response at low engine speeds, so this makes sense in that light.
They also refer to a Thomas Knight electric supercharger which apparently will go head-to-head against a mechanical supercharger. Presumably it costs more than $100.