C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Intake manifold time, need advice!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2009 | 06:49 PM
  #21  
AU N EGL's Avatar
AU N EGL
Team Owner
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 33
From: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Default

BIG HP numbers are sexy has all heck, but if your not always driving above 6400 rpms, why have them? Bench, Bar and forum racing?

I run a small cam 224/224 581/581 112+4 with a stock LS6 intake and tpis 78mm tb. intake was polished a bit to clean up some ruff edges but not really ported.
243 heads, again polished a bit to clean up any ruff edges but not ported and 918 springs. My own CAI like the Honker.

LTs, high flow cats and straight pipes. Underdrive pulley, high volume oil pump and an oil accu-sump with oil cooler.

405 rwhp and 407 rwtq. Last winters dyno.

at 2500 rpms right at 390 rwtq.

now I dont drag race but do track days on road courses. I can just about out accelerate almost anything out of a corner and UP to 125 mph. Over 125 mph I am toasted. But they have to catch me first,

what I was getting at, get a smaller cam and set up that will give you immediate throttle response, and off the line torque. It may not be a dyno queen, but you will love the ride.

If would have done it over I would have put in a 224/228 581/588 112+4 cam or maybe a 224/230 588/600 113+4
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #22  
VetteNo2's Avatar
VetteNo2
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Louisville Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by AU N EGL
at 2500 rpms right at 390 rwtq
I am jealous. This is a ton of 2,500 RPM RWQ for a 5.7 liter! Your tires must spin when you exhale.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 06:55 PM
  #23  
VetteNo2's Avatar
VetteNo2
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Louisville Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by mdchaser
Thanks everyone for all of the input, it is all good and all very confusing . I know I'm choked for air up top (according to my tuner) so an intake manifold would help I believe. Unfortunately because I don't spend all of my time at 6400rpms it might be a bit of a waste. It looks like I could try swapping out cams for something like a 228/228 112 to get some more low/mid range power but the cost on that is going to be fairly high. On the manifold front it's looking like a fast with a new tb will also be quite expensive but easier to install. I really don't like the cheatr cam, it's very soft until 4k rpms. The engine also has a VERY loud tick from the cam (so I've been told) so changing cams would help in that regard also. I'm up in the air right now, any thoughts?
As a read this post and re-read the original, I began to wonder whether your engine is "choked for air." You have good heads, headers and the LS6 manifold is pretty good. Your power output seems good. Why do you think that your engine is choked? If you want more top end or mid-range, a new intake manifold will help and you don't need to turn 6,400 RPM's to get big gains. The FAST 90 starts outdoing the stocker in the mid-3,000's. There are other good manifolds, too.

However, you mentioned in the quote above that the Cheatr cam is soft until 4,000. You also mentioned in the OP that you didn't want to lose low-end performance. Do you really mean that you would like to improve your low-end performance? If this is the case, I would steer you away from the manifold as a first stop.

I also wonder about your comment on the Cheatr cam's softness below 4,000. The Cheatr is usually recommended for folks who want more power across the power band and a decent idle. It is often used in automatics. The Cheatr should be a good low-end cam. Is your cam installed straight-up, retarded or advanced? Switching it from straight up to 4-5 degrees of advance would make a relatively large positive difference to your low-end with a relatively smaller decrease up top. I don't know how hard it is to change this parameter with the cam already installed but it might not be that hard. Your tuner would know.

Is your low-end tune optimized? Do you have 1 7/8 headers? Either of these could be serious problems.

How much RWTQ do you have at 2,500 RPM's? Maybe your torque standards are very high.

Is there something else wrong? Your car should not be soft up to 4,000 RPM's.

If everything checks out you might want to look into advancing the cam. This could be 8-10 ft pounds down low. You may also want to use a thinner head gasket to pick up 8-10 ft pounds across most of the range. A $75 rubber TB spacer has been tested to add 6 ft pounds down low. An electric water pump would add 9-10 pounds starting fairly low in the range. Excluding advancing the cam, this other stuff might be $750-$1,000 if you do the work, $750 more if you don't. If your tuner can retrofit an adjustable timing chain, you'd need to add another $500-750 to this to advance the cam.

When you finish all of this get the FAST 90 as your own Christmas present. Yo'll love the mid-range torque! However, it is not the cure for the softness below 4,000.

I understand that this is all off topic, if you really want a manifold. Whatever you do, enjoy it!

Last edited by VetteNo2; Oct 1, 2009 at 01:55 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #24  
deadcafe's Avatar
deadcafe
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach Virginia
Default

I have a 2000 frc 6spd, with a car killing set up. if you want fast and powerfull here is the list:

FAST 92 (there is no need for porting if you have under 400 cubic inches it is a WASTE OF MONEY for this particular intake).
FAST 92mm Throttle body
PRC stage 2.5 5.3 heads ported
TSP 233-239 dur cam .595/.604 lift 112 lobe sep.
LG Street 1 3/4 long tube headers
Off Road X pipe
B&B Bullets
centerforce dual friction clutch, pressure plate.
summit 25% underdrive pulley
RAM bullit steel fly wheel
1 mean *** street tune
I put approx 465rwhp and 450rwtq of tire shredding power to the ground in a 3096 pound car. this equates to about 515 to 530 hp on the engine.
Were I to do it again I would go with the TSP Tsunami cam. I dont know if this is the answer you are looking for but I have yet to see anything on the street put me to shame.. I like that fact.
Wait till I install the 3:90 gear set up.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #25  
mdchaser's Avatar
mdchaser
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: Chico CA
Default

Originally Posted by VetteNo2
As a read this post and re-read the original, I began to wonder whether your engine is "choked for air." You have good heads, headers and the LS6 manifold is pretty good. Your power output seems good. Why do you think that your engine is choked? If you want more top end or mid-range, a new intake manifold will help and you don't need to turn 6,400 RPM's to get big gains. The FAST 90 starts outdoing the stocker in the mid-3,000's. There are other good manifolds, too.

However, you mentioned in the quote above that the Cheatr cam is soft until 4,000. You also mentioned in the OP that you didn't want to lose low-end performance. Do you really mean that you would like to improve your low-end performance? If this is the case, I would steer you away from the manifold as a first stop.

I also wonder about your comment on the Cheatr cam's softness below 4,000. The Cheatr is usually recommended for folks who want more power across the power band and a decent idle. It is often used in automatics. The Cheatr should be a good low-end cam. Is your cam installed straight-up, retarded or advanced? Switching it from straight up to 4-5 degrees of advance would make a relatively large positive difference to your low-end with a relatively smaller decrease up top. I don't know how hard it is to change this parameter with the cam already installed but it might not be that hard. Your tuner would know.

Is your low-end tune optimized? Do you have 1 7/8 headers? Either of these could be serious problems.

How much RWTQ do you have at 2,500 RPM's? Maybe your torque standards are very high.

Is there something else wrong? Your car should not be soft up to 4,000 RPM's.

If everything checks out you might want to look into advancing the cam. This could be 8-10 ft pounds down low. You may also want to use a thinner head gasket to pick up 8-10 ft pounds across most of the range. A $75 rubber TB spacer has been tested to add 6 ft pounds down low. An electric water pump would add 9-10 pounds starting fairly low in the range. Excluding advancing the cam, this other stuff might be $750-$1,000 if you do the work, $750 more if you don't. If your tuner can retrofit an adjustable timing chain, you'd need to add another $500-750 to this to advance the cam.

When you finish all of this get the FAST 90 as your own Christmas present. Yo'll love the mid-range torque! However, it is not the cure for the softness below 4,000.

I understand that this is all off topic, if you really want a manifold. Whatever you do, enjoy it!
Oops I managed to forget about this thread for the past month. I think it's choked for air because that's what my tuner said . I was told it was running out of air and that I was at 100% duty cycle on the injectors. I've got new svo injectors but I was going to wait to put them in until I got a new manifold. The car is no slouch under 4k it just hits like a ton of bricks once you pass the 4k mark. I will look at advancing the cam, I'm no mechanic so I have no idea how to do it but I've got some friends that might know. If advancing the cam could pick up some low end power that would be great! Where would I pick up a tb space? How would a spacer increase power? Thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:08 PM
  #26  
mdchaser's Avatar
mdchaser
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: Chico CA
Default

Originally Posted by VetteNo2
As a read this post and re-read the original, I began to wonder whether your engine is "choked for air." You have good heads, headers and the LS6 manifold is pretty good. Your power output seems good. Why do you think that your engine is choked? If you want more top end or mid-range, a new intake manifold will help and you don't need to turn 6,400 RPM's to get big gains. The FAST 90 starts outdoing the stocker in the mid-3,000's. There are other good manifolds, too.

However, you mentioned in the quote above that the Cheatr cam is soft until 4,000. You also mentioned in the OP that you didn't want to lose low-end performance. Do you really mean that you would like to improve your low-end performance? If this is the case, I would steer you away from the manifold as a first stop.

I also wonder about your comment on the Cheatr cam's softness below 4,000. The Cheatr is usually recommended for folks who want more power across the power band and a decent idle. It is often used in automatics. The Cheatr should be a good low-end cam. Is your cam installed straight-up, retarded or advanced? Switching it from straight up to 4-5 degrees of advance would make a relatively large positive difference to your low-end with a relatively smaller decrease up top. I don't know how hard it is to change this parameter with the cam already installed but it might not be that hard. Your tuner would know.

Is your low-end tune optimized? Do you have 1 7/8 headers? Either of these could be serious problems.

How much RWTQ do you have at 2,500 RPM's? Maybe your torque standards are very high.

Is there something else wrong? Your car should not be soft up to 4,000 RPM's.

If everything checks out you might want to look into advancing the cam. This could be 8-10 ft pounds down low. You may also want to use a thinner head gasket to pick up 8-10 ft pounds across most of the range. A $75 rubber TB spacer has been tested to add 6 ft pounds down low. An electric water pump would add 9-10 pounds starting fairly low in the range. Excluding advancing the cam, this other stuff might be $750-$1,000 if you do the work, $750 more if you don't. If your tuner can retrofit an adjustable timing chain, you'd need to add another $500-750 to this to advance the cam.

When you finish all of this get the FAST 90 as your own Christmas present. Yo'll love the mid-range torque! However, it is not the cure for the softness below 4,000.

I understand that this is all off topic, if you really want a manifold. Whatever you do, enjoy it!
Oops I managed to forget about this thread for the past month. I think it's choked for air because that's what my tuner said . I was told it was running out of air and that I was at 100% duty cycle on the injectors. I've got new svo injectors but I was going to wait to put them in until I got a new manifold. The car is no slouch under 4k it just hits like a ton of bricks once you pass the 4k mark. I will look at advancing the cam, I'm no mechanic so I have no idea how to do it but I've got some friends that might know. If advancing the cam could pick up some low end power that would be great! Where would I pick up a tb space? How would a spacer increase power? Thanks!
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE