When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have talked to a few people about cryo treating my 1th-4th gears in the trans. A couple people have said to do it, others have said its a waste of money. I want to know your guys opinions on this. Reason why I am asking is bc I blew the counter shaft gears and it took a couple other gears with it. I know no one makes a stronger gear for the M12 trans so I need what I can get as far as trying to make it last. I have just over 760rwhp and I am hoping this is the last time I will be pulling the trans out for a rebuild.
i dont have personal experience but i do have first hand experience from a distance with someone elses car. 700+ rwhp street car, not so much as a peep from the tranny.
So your suggesting what? Micro bead polishing, but not cryo treating them? Where can I look into that?
get your gears from Rockland Strandard.
What they provided are hardened steel gears designed for racing. Shift forks designed for racing.
forget the mico polish or cryo idea. When you start asking about little specifics, they think this guy does not know what he is talking about.
Send your trans to Rockland to have them rebuild it properly to take the 750 rwhp.
If you read their tech papers you see that one of the causes of trans failure is cheap parts and or replacing only a few parts and not rebuilding the whole trans.
Parts are lift spans. When you have that much HP you need to rebuild often and that is just the way it is.
if tumble polishing and cyro treating things helps nothing, why do those processes exist? for FUN! thats why!
ive heard quite a bit about cry and tumble polishing gears for strength. there where some guys years back that had a regular tremec 5 speed running 8 second quarter miles with polished and cryo'd gears. x2c racing was their name, and i actually had the x2c v.2.0 in my mustang, but never even got to test it really as other things came up and i ended up parting the car out.. so i didnt count that as personal experience.
forget the mico polish or cryo idea. When you start asking about little specifics, they think this guy does not know what he is talking about.
If you read their tech papers you see that one of the causes of trans failure is cheap parts and or replacing only a few parts and not rebuilding the whole trans.
Good Luck
when you start asking questions they cant answer because they dont have the answers, they treat you like you are a moron so that you will shut up, fall in line, and be herded through their cash drawer like everyone else that buys from them. or thats how it sounds, and is another way to look at that statement.
if you read their tech papers, you will see that they are too lazy to inspect parts, and its easier on them and less work to just buy all new parts, and they pass that off as some value to you. the truth is a LOT of technicians have that attitude. and in a transmission esp with gears that could have micro cracks it COULD be of some value, but most likely isnt. and if everything else must be replaced.. they are basically forcing you into a full build. hoorah.
I do have personal experience with design and testing of transmission gears and I agree with AU N EGL.
The fact is any strength gained by micro polishing is minimal at best the real ways to improve strength are material changes.
So if you can find someone to make some gears from 9310 steel you will have the best you can get without changing helix angle.
To go beyond that would take a complete redesign of the gear box including center distance and face width of gears.
Face it, at your power levels a transmission is disposable!
Face it, at your power levels a transmission is disposable!
I looked at buying an ex Trans Am race car (800 hp) and I was told the same thing. At that level transmissions are like brake pads, rotors and tires, they are disposable.
again Rockland Standard makes their gears out of the 9310 steel. IIRC
I work for a major defense contractor, and am a manufacturing engineer. Over twenty years ago, I did a controlled comparison test for cryo treated cutting tools. The test was well-controlled, but I and the team were unable to discover ANY difference in performance as a result of the use of the cryo treating. I realize the applicability is a different deal. Surface hardness vs. strength. But, the two are related. Frankly, I think this is a snake oil process that just won't go away. It exists because someone thought of it and had success selling it. That doesn't mean that it works. Think about gasoline ionizers that "improve fuel economy 50%". If cryo-treating did work, many of the factory transmission and differential parts would be cryo treated. Not to make them 800HP strong, or longer lasting, but to make them equally strong, but smaller and lighter in weight.
To the OP, IMHO, at your power level, the cryo treatment is money spent unwisely. Say the upgraded M12 will take up to 600 FT LBS, the cryo treatment might up that to 630 FT LBS. Is it worth it? Only your $$ would know. This trannie came out of an 02 Z06 with the same power level as yours!